You are just being an arse!
How about reading the full linked article and maybe the other also at that URL;
theaviationgeekclub.com
P-3 NFOs get sea time by being shooters. I have two friends who did tours on carriers. Other NFOs are not ships company but air wing. I actually do know what I am talking about.You are just being an arse!
If it's your post #34 above that "was a ******* joke" it was rather lame and not clear as humor. Better work on your delivery, which needs an overhaul.
How is it you're so sure the NFO had only one tour on the/a ship ?!
As for the toothache, if result of cunnilingus might need to consult a gynecologists.
He was also likely trained as a SWO and as a nuke which .makes him much more qualified than any plain old GIB. (guy in back).This guy was carrier command material most likely.How about reading the full linked article and maybe the other also at that URL;
...
The question is: would it be possible to keep these vessels in service longer than their programmed life?
‘I served aboard two carriers on their last deployments, Enterprise being one of them, and those boats were worn out and past ready to be put to pasture,’ Andy Burns, former US Navy Surface Warfare & Naval Flight Officer, says on Quora. ‘Enterprise was not “up to date” by the time she was decommed. And their robustness and cost are the reason they’re kept around as long as they are. Sailing thousands of miles of saltwater while flinging planes off the roof is a hard life. Fifty years – programmed life of a CVN – is a long time to be in such service.
...
Naval Flight Officer explains why despite their robustness (and cost) aircraft carriers can’t be kept in service longer than their programmed life - The Aviation Geek Club
Naval Flight Officer explains why aircraft carriers can’t be kept in service longer than their programmed life
Burns sounds a lot more qualified to talk about the subject than you do, swabby.
Yeah, except they are miles apart when deployed. This must be a SecNav promotion shot. lol
It's also a very rational look at the realities of duty on vessels.How about reading the full linked article and maybe the other also at that URL;
...
The question is: would it be possible to keep these vessels in service longer than their programmed life?
‘I served aboard two carriers on their last deployments, Enterprise being one of them, and those boats were worn out and past ready to be put to pasture,’ Andy Burns, former US Navy Surface Warfare & Naval Flight Officer, says on Quora. ‘Enterprise was not “up to date” by the time she was decommed. And their robustness and cost are the reason they’re kept around as long as they are. Sailing thousands of miles of saltwater while flinging planes off the roof is a hard life. Fifty years – programmed life of a CVN – is a long time to be in such service.
...
Naval Flight Officer explains why despite their robustness (and cost) aircraft carriers can’t be kept in service longer than their programmed life - The Aviation Geek Club
Naval Flight Officer explains why aircraft carriers can’t be kept in service longer than their programmed life
Burns sounds a lot more qualified to talk about the subject than you do, swabby.
