Palestinians Hold The Key To Their Own Future

The Catholic Encyclopedia only mentions the 1905 census, which is believable as the European Zionists had been flooding into Palestine since the mid 1800s. You also forgot to include "the rest of the story" with respect to the Catholic Encyclopedia citation:

"The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkishcensus of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures: Jews, 45,000;Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites,úCopts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly half the present population."

AND..
What's the matter with Most of the Jews coming in the 19th Century?
MOST of the PalestinKians/ARABS were immigrants too.
Their number grew in strongly throughout the Late 19th century too.. BUT EVEN GREATER IN THE EARLY 20TH Century as they followed the Jews in for Jobs.

MOST Australians and Americans were not there before the late 19th/Early 20th either.

How many Americans were West of the Mississippi in 1850?


Montelicita said:
Hoisted by your own petard. Half the population was in newly built suburbs to house the new Jewish colonists. LOL
Indeed you were.
What disqualifying about "the 19th Century"?


Montelicita said:
As far as the Christian Zionist magazine citation, well, it's not worth discussing.
The backbone of the Chart were the Three OTTOMAN CENSUSES. (1844, 1876, 1905)
Again, NOT In Dispute except by the Brain Dead.

And in Jerusalem, as well as Safed, and a few others, Jews have been a Majority since about 1840.
And of course, Jews did NOT get All of Palestine. They got about Half, in which THEY were the Majority.


Oooops!

Montelicita said:
As far as Palestine to be a separate Jewish state. The British denied this in writing several times. Here is one example:
.....
I guess we can see who the propagandist is.
Yes, I already Posted the Weizmn-Faisal agreement.
You had NO Answer as to WHO the 'Palestinians' really were (the JEWS)
There was to a Single JEWISH majority Homeland with an Arab minority.
Of course, they were so hostile they had to be split.
Thus, the Partition.

The whole purpose of the British Mandate was to create a Majority Jewish State in Palestine... with an Arab Minority.

But due to Arab Hostility and Number (Following the Jews in for jobs and breeding Like Rabbits) and British gratefullness to Faisal, the Arabs managed to get their Own state in the Partition.

However they were/are a greedy, envious, belligerent lot, and wanted it all.
"Bulls make money, Bears make money, PIGS get PORKED"

Sqooosh

`
 
"The whole purpose of the British Mandate was to create a Majority Jewish State in Palestine... with an Arab Minority."

Absolutely not:

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.'

The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate

(Following the Jews in for jobs and breeding Like Rabbits)


"Out of a total number of
360,822 immigrants who entered Palestine between 1920 and 1942,
only 27,981 or 7.8% were Arabs. "

Page 795, Survey of Palestine Vol 2

Berman Jewish Policy Archive

A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner


 
abu afak: "The whole purpose of the British Mandate was to create a Majority Jewish State in Palestine... with an Arab Minority."

Absolutely not:...
LOL my Arabist Goofball unispal-estinian Spammer.
And as always..
You DISHONESTLY answered only ONE.
What happened to the Larger point about 'Jews being there in the 19th C' Point you said 'Hoisted petard'.
I actually hoisted Your REtard.

The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?
You Folded like a Tent.

As to the decapitaion of your tiny Arabism.....

British Mandate for Palestine legal instrument - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was alegal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Empire sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of theLeague of Nations on 24 July 1922, supplemented via the 16 September 1922Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and then came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The document was based on the principles contained in Article 22 of the draftCovenant of the League of Nations and the San Remo Resolution of 25 April 1920, by the principal Allied and associated powers after the First World War.[1]The mandate formalised British rule in the southern part of Ottoman Syria from 1923–1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5]

The mandate document formalised the Creation of Two British protectorates: Palestine, to include a National Home for the Jewish People, under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain, under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]
[......]​

A National Home for the JEWS/Palestine, and an Arab Jordan.
(thus, Faisal-Weizman)
NO Arab immigrant Palestink.
YOU LOSE.


BTW, using a second post with NO Topical content is TROLLING.
Ironically, trumpeting what would turn out to be YOUR LOSS.
You can't debate me you Islamist Clown.

`
 
Last edited:
Hey Montelucia...
Never Caught your Response to the Faisal-Weizman agreement on Palestine/the JEWISH state?

instead of that Acknowledgement all we got was daily major Spamming of some complaining Arab letters in 1922 AS IF they proved anything.

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Jerusalem (After 1291)
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291

"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000;
Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm
`

Testimony Magazine???? A Christian Zionist magazine.

Let's instead use source documentation, such as the initial report to the League of Nations by the Mandatory.

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. In the following 30 years a few hundreds came to Palestine. Most of them were animated by religious motives; they came to pray and to die in the Holy Land, and to be buried in its soil. After the persecutions in Russia forty years ago, the movement of the Jews to Palestine assumed larger proportions. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report o
Um..
BOTH Of My Sources used the OTTOMAN Censuses of 1844, 1876, and 1905 which are NOT in dispute.
Including Catholic Encylopedia, which you Ignored.

You are an Arabist SPAMMER, incapable of debate, merely/endlessly Posting PalestinKian letters from Unispal, the PalestinKian division of the UN.

You have NOT answered ANYTHING.

Faisal Weizman?
NOPE
It DESTROYED your whole premise.
The debate ENDED.
'Palestine' was to be the JEWISH State.

`

The Catholic Encyclopedia only mentions the 1905 census, which is believable as the European Zionists had been flooding into Palestine since the mid 1800s. You also forgot to include "the rest of the story" with respect to the Catholic Encyclopedia citation:

"The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkishcensus of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures: Jews, 45,000;Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites,úCopts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly half the present population."

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291

Hoisted by your own petard. Half the population was in newly built suburbs to house the new Jewish colonists. LOL

As far as the Christian Zionist magazine citation, well, it's not worth discussing.

As far as Palestine to be a separate Jewish state. The British denied this in writing several times. Here is one example:

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

The Avalon Project British White Paper of June 1922

I guess we can see who the propagandist is.






Invited by the legal land owners to migrate and settle, do you want to know why Abdul ?

Non sequitur Phoney.





Destroyed by your own link as the conclusion does follow from its premise.

Try again abdul
 
No. He wants Israel returned to the Jews and everyone else to vacate and that is exactly the same feelings I have on the matter. It's Jewish state and it belongs to the Jews.

Let me add this to my own belief about Israel - which is holy ground. These other religions, buildings, mosques, Roman Catholic Churches / offices/ ministries, etc does not belong there, Monte. I want them all out of there. Like yesterday.

I do not want to see any Arab person exterminated. I'd like to see all of them saved, happy, living in peace in their own lands. Just not Israel. I'm four square with the Ezra company. They have to leave - they don't belong there - they never belonged there. The Jews should have done it after the 6 day war but they didn't.

The Palestinian Christians and Muslims are the people of Palestine. The Jews are Europeans. The European Jews do not belong in Palestine, they belong in Europe where they and their ancestors came from. I don't want the European Jews hurt in any way. But they should return to where they came from. Spain has already offered to accept them, the rest of Europe will do the same.
That is propaganda and you should not believe it. The Jews ancestors moved to Europe for a time but they are making Aliyah back to Israel and more will in the days ahead now that Bibi has called for this.
Any Christians that you are referencing here - calling themselves Palestinian Christians - that are making themselves enemies of the Jews and Israel are enemies of Jesus Christ and will find themselves in hell over it. The Muslim people are lost. They need salvation in Christ. That is what I pray for. There is no salvation in Mohammad. Mohammad didn't die on a cross for anyone's sins. Jesus did. If you do not come to God through Jesus Christ you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. That is the truth. Please share it with others.

Jesus was a jew. Jews taught the world about a single god. God made a covenant with the jews. The prophets were jews.
Why must one go through Jesus to find god? God is supposed to be in all things and all mankind.
All path lead to god in the end.
If Jesus died for the sins of mankind, not just those that believe in Jesus as "the son" of God, then we should all be without sin. We are all the children of god, but it took more than 300 yrs before the church agreed that Jesus was divine. That no path but though Jesus could lead to god. So what happened to all those who believed in the one god during that time? What happened to all those from the time of Abraham, Jacob and Issac?
Jesus was sentenced to the cross for being a threat to the king, for being a threat to rome, not because he was the son of god. The actions of Jesus put him on the cross.
If god is a good and loving god then all his children no matter the sin or path they take should be welcomed into god's loving arms.
With 7 billion people in the world, how can there be only one path?
Perhaps the path is as simple as "do what you want but harm none" or "do unto other as you would have them do unto you", or some variation? Golden rule in some form exists in almost every culture going back some 2000 yrs before Jesus.
So how can it be the truth that there is only the one path through Jesus? How can there be only one church that is right when there are more than 30,000 different denominations of christianity? How can there be only one right faith when jews and muslim supposedly believe in the same god? How do you even know what is right when there were some 200 gospels/books left out of the bible codex? When there are so many differing bibles since the time of Jesus, which one is the most valid?
How do you know when the other 7 billion think that they too know their own truth as the right one? How do you know more than the rest of the planet?

Jesus is God, Aris. There is only One God. Jesus Christ is God. See John 1:1 There is only one way. Jesus Christ is the Way. He is the Truth. He is the Life. No man comes to the Father except through the Son. Jesus Christ is the Way. There is only One way to heaven. Through Jesus Christ.

How do I know I'm right? I have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and I know Him.

Furthermore,

I believe my King James Bible because it is the infallible Word of God. (not fallible man) I believe God. Not man.

Oh dear. I guess the Zionists will take any sort of ally.




Don't you mean the muslims, after all they are the ones with most to lose.
 
I don't agree with that,MJB. Because there is no such thing as a Palestinian. The people of Palestine were always known as the Jews. They have never called themselves Palestinians. The Arabs began calling themselves Palestinians some time after Israel was reborn in order to confuse the world into believing they had a claim to it. They don't.

Had the Jews recognized the moment - after the 6 day war - in which they took the Temple Mount and every single Arab fled - they would have realized that God's Word about coming into the land - still stood. Destroy the high places, tear down the altars of Baal! (Al Asqa Mosque) and drive out the inhabitants of the land! Not give your enemy (who has vowed to destroy you) control of the Temple Mount and let them dwell amongst you! It was a huge mistake. Can the LORD fix that? He not only can! He will!

Besides being a crazy fundamentalist, on the par with the worst of the Islamist crazies. You are full of shit.

The people of Palestine were Christians until the Byzantines were defeated and then many converted to Islam. Why would they call themselves Jews?

The Palestinians were calling themselves, in writing, the Palestinian People in the earliest negotiations with the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

"Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable. If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration". - See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

I'm not going to argue with you. I have read your posts before, Montelatici and I disagree with you. That is all I have left to say.

There is nothing to argue about. You can disagree all you want with me, but you can't disagree with the facts.




Depends on whether the facts are real or fake ISLAMONAZI ones doesn't it. Your facts are the latter so don't take much to disprove
 
Neither can you. They reveal that you are wrong. Still. There is really nothing left to say because you are not going to admit this and I can not agree with you when I know what you believe is not the truth. I feel compassion for you. Monte, because I do believe that YOU believe you're right. Only the LORD can reveal the truth to you. If you should desire to know it.

This is my last post on this thread now. Bye.

The facts are exactly as I stated and provided source documentation for. All you can claim is that you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ who you claim told you different. I am sure he was kidding, as he knows the facts and, I am sure he would support his followers, the Christian Palestinians, rather than the Jews. In fact, you are a bit of a traitor to us Christians, now that I think about it.




You are no more a Christian than Arafat was, you could not even answer simple questions that a 10 year old child would know by heart.
 
No. He wants Israel returned to the Jews and everyone else to vacate and that is exactly the same feelings I have on the matter. It's Jewish state and it belongs to the Jews.

Let me add this to my own belief about Israel - which is holy ground. These other religions, buildings, mosques, Roman Catholic Churches / offices/ ministries, etc does not belong there, Monte. I want them all out of there. Like yesterday.

I do not want to see any Arab person exterminated. I'd like to see all of them saved, happy, living in peace in their own lands. Just not Israel. I'm four square with the Ezra company. They have to leave - they don't belong there - they never belonged there. The Jews should have done it after the 6 day war but they didn't.

The Palestinian Christians and Muslims are the people of Palestine. The Jews are Europeans. The European Jews do not belong in Palestine, they belong in Europe where they and their ancestors came from. I don't want the European Jews hurt in any way. But they should return to where they came from. Spain has already offered to accept them, the rest of Europe will do the same.
That is propaganda and you should not believe it. The Jews ancestors moved to Europe for a time but they are making Aliyah back to Israel and more will in the days ahead now that Bibi has called for this.
Any Christians that you are referencing here - calling themselves Palestinian Christians - that are making themselves enemies of the Jews and Israel are enemies of Jesus Christ and will find themselves in hell over it. The Muslim people are lost. They need salvation in Christ. That is what I pray for. There is no salvation in Mohammad. Mohammad didn't die on a cross for anyone's sins. Jesus did. If you do not come to God through Jesus Christ you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. That is the truth. Please share it with others.

Jesus was a jew. Jews taught the world about a single god. God made a covenant with the jews. The prophets were jews.
Why must one go through Jesus to find god? God is supposed to be in all things and all mankind.
All path lead to god in the end.
If Jesus died for the sins of mankind, not just those that believe in Jesus as "the son" of God, then we should all be without sin. We are all the children of god, but it took more than 300 yrs before the church agreed that Jesus was divine. That no path but though Jesus could lead to god. So what happened to all those who believed in the one god during that time? What happened to all those from the time of Abraham, Jacob and Issac?
Jesus was sentenced to the cross for being a threat to the king, for being a threat to rome, not because he was the son of god. The actions of Jesus put him on the cross.
If god is a good and loving god then all his children no matter the sin or path they take should be welcomed into god's loving arms.
With 7 billion people in the world, how can there be only one path?
Perhaps the path is as simple as "do what you want but harm none" or "do unto other as you would have them do unto you", or some variation? Golden rule in some form exists in almost every culture going back some 2000 yrs before Jesus.
So how can it be the truth that there is only the one path through Jesus? How can there be only one church that is right when there are more than 30,000 different denominations of christianity? How can there be only one right faith when jews and muslim supposedly believe in the same god? How do you even know what is right when there were some 200 gospels/books left out of the bible codex? When there are so many differing bibles since the time of Jesus, which one is the most valid?
How do you know when the other 7 billion think that they too know their own truth as the right one? How do you know more than the rest of the planet?

Jesus is God, Aris. There is only One God. Jesus Christ is God. See John 1:1 There is only one way. Jesus Christ is the Way. He is the Truth. He is the Life. No man comes to the Father except through the Son. Jesus Christ is the Way. There is only One way to heaven. Through Jesus Christ.

How do I know I'm right? I have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and I know Him.

Furthermore,

I believe my King James Bible because it is the infallible Word of God. (not fallible man) I believe God. Not man.
yawn.gif
 
abu afak: "The whole purpose of the British Mandate was to create a Majority Jewish State in Palestine... with an Arab Minority."

Absolutely not:...
LOL my Arabist Goofball unispal-estinian Spammer.
And as always..
You DISHONESTLY answered only ONE.
What happened to the Larger point about 'Jews being there in the 19th C' Point you said 'Hoisted petard'.
I actually hoisted Your REtard.

The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?
You Folded like a Tent.

As to the decapitaion of your tiny Arabism.....

British Mandate for Palestine legal instrument - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was alegal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Empire sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of theLeague of Nations on 24 July 1922, supplemented via the 16 September 1922Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and then came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The document was based on the principles contained in Article 22 of the draftCovenant of the League of Nations and the San Remo Resolution of 25 April 1920, by the principal Allied and associated powers after the First World War.[1]The mandate formalised British rule in the southern part of Ottoman Syria from 1923–1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5]

The mandate document formalised the Creation of Two British protectorates: Palestine, to include a National Home for the Jewish People, under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain, under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]
[......]​

A National Home for the JEWS/Palestine, and an Arab Jordan.
(thus, Faisal-Weizman)
NO Arab immigrant Palestink.
YOU LOSE.


BTW, using a second post with NO Topical content is TROLLING.
Ironically, trumpeting what would turn out to be YOUR LOSS.
You can't debate me you Islamist Clown.

`

So, I post source documentation and you post wiki nonsense that can change tomorrow. You are all over the place posting propaganda which has non basis in fact and it shows.

But let's just look at one of your crazy assertions:

"The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?"

Jews were less than half of the population of Palestine prior to partition and received more than 50% of the land. Why do you outright lie.

Prior to Partition (end of 1946) the population of Palestine was as follows per the:

UNITED
NATIONS A
General Assembly
A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
SUPPLEMENT No. 11
UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE
REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
VOLUME 1
Lake Success
New York
1947



"Arabs, 1,203,000; Jews, 608,000; others, 35,000; Total, 1,846,000"


A 364 of 3 September 1947

Stop posting bullshit.









 
abu afak: "The whole purpose of the British Mandate was to create a Majority Jewish State in Palestine... with an Arab Minority."

Absolutely not:...
LOL my Arabist Goofball unispal-estinian Spammer.
And as always..
You DISHONESTLY answered only ONE.
What happened to the Larger point about 'Jews being there in the 19th C' Point you said 'Hoisted petard'.
I actually hoisted Your REtard.

The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?
You Folded like a Tent.

As to the decapitaion of your tiny Arabism.....

British Mandate for Palestine legal instrument - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was alegal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Empire sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of theLeague of Nations on 24 July 1922, supplemented via the 16 September 1922Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and then came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The document was based on the principles contained in Article 22 of the draftCovenant of the League of Nations and the San Remo Resolution of 25 April 1920, by the principal Allied and associated powers after the First World War.[1]The mandate formalised British rule in the southern part of Ottoman Syria from 1923–1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5]

The mandate document formalised the Creation of Two British protectorates: Palestine, to include a National Home for the Jewish People, under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain, under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]
[......]​

A National Home for the JEWS/Palestine, and an Arab Jordan.
(thus, Faisal-Weizman)
NO Arab immigrant Palestink.
YOU LOSE.


BTW, using a second post with NO Topical content is TROLLING.
Ironically, trumpeting what would turn out to be YOUR LOSS.
You can't debate me you Islamist Clown.

`

So, I post source documentation and you post wiki nonsense that can change tomorrow. You are all over the place posting propaganda which has non basis in fact and it shows.

But let's just look at one of your crazy assertions:

"The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?"

Jews were less than half of the population of Palestine prior to partition and received more than 50% of the land. Why do you outright lie.

Prior to Partition (end of 1946) the population of Palestine was as follows per the:

UNITED
NATIONS A
General Assembly
A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
SUPPLEMENT No. 11
UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE
REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
VOLUME 1
Lake Success
New York
1947



"Arabs, 1,203,000; Jews, 608,000; others, 35,000; Total, 1,846,000"


A 364 of 3 September 1947

Stop posting bullshit.













The partition was in 1948 not 1946 dummy, and as the link you provided shows the Jews were in the majority
 
The JEWS OWN PALESTINE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW and you cant alter it
:link::link::link::link::link:



How many more times do you need the same link, and then ignore it.

Read the Mandate for Palestine it is in there

What does the Mandate for Palestine have to do with the population of Palestine prior to Partition?




It was International Law at the time so it has everything to do with it. The partion was the end of the mandate on may 15 1948.
 
abu afak: "The whole purpose of the British Mandate was to create a Majority Jewish State in Palestine... with an Arab Minority."

Absolutely not:...
LOL my Arabist Goofball unispal-estinian Spammer.
And as always..
You DISHONESTLY answered only ONE.
What happened to the Larger point about 'Jews being there in the 19th C' Point you said 'Hoisted petard'.
I actually hoisted Your REtard.

The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?
You Folded like a Tent.

As to the decapitaion of your tiny Arabism.....

British Mandate for Palestine legal instrument - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was alegal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Empire sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of theLeague of Nations on 24 July 1922, supplemented via the 16 September 1922Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and then came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The document was based on the principles contained in Article 22 of the draftCovenant of the League of Nations and the San Remo Resolution of 25 April 1920, by the principal Allied and associated powers after the First World War.[1]The mandate formalised British rule in the southern part of Ottoman Syria from 1923–1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5]

The mandate document formalised the Creation of Two British protectorates: Palestine, to include a National Home for the Jewish People, under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain, under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]
[......]​

A National Home for the JEWS/Palestine, and an Arab Jordan.
(thus, Faisal-Weizman)
NO Arab immigrant Palestink.
YOU LOSE.


BTW, using a second post with NO Topical content is TROLLING.
Ironically, trumpeting what would turn out to be YOUR LOSS.
You can't debate me you Islamist Clown.

`

So, I post source documentation and you post wiki nonsense that can change tomorrow. You are all over the place posting propaganda which has non basis in fact and it shows.

But let's just look at one of your crazy assertions:

"The Jews only getting HALF of Palestine in which They were a Majority?"

Jews were less than half of the population of Palestine prior to partition and received more than 50% of the land. Why do you outright lie.

Prior to Partition (end of 1946) the population of Palestine was as follows per the:

UNITED
NATIONS A
General Assembly
A/364
3 September 1947
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE SECOND SESSION OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
SUPPLEMENT No. 11
UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
ON PALESTINE
REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
VOLUME 1
Lake Success
New York
1947



"Arabs, 1,203,000; Jews, 608,000; others, 35,000; Total, 1,846,000"


A 364 of 3 September 1947

Stop posting bullshit.





The partition was in 1948 not 1946 dummy, and as the link you provided shows the Jews were in the majority

Wrong, resolution 181 was issued on 29 November 1947. The General Assembly Report for used for Resolution 181 was issued on September 3, 1947.

The link shows that the Jews were less than 50% of the population of Palestine prior to the issuance of Resolution 181. Quit bullshitting.
 
15th post
Deceptive as Always Mr Goofy.
Jews were a MAJORITY in what would Become 'Israel'.


1. When Israel was set up in 1947, the area designated was a clear Majority Jewish area; 538,000 Jews and 397,000 Arabs.
(note: The latter 'Arabs' also including other non-jews)
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Jews were a Minority ONLY in Overall Palestine. (the Arabs rejected the near 100% Arab state)
As too land...
Jews, about 1/3 of the population, got 50+% of the Land.
Of course HALF of the Jews HALF was the Thought-useless, near-empty, Negev DESERT, thrown in for viabiliy sake.
IOW, Jews got about 1/4 of the USABLE/ARABLE Land.
IOW, they got LESS of the arable land than their number justifies.

You LOSE AGAIN my Arabist friend
SQOOOSH #97!
You Can't Debate Me Goofy!
`
 
Last edited:
Deceptive as Always Mr Goofy.
Jews were a MAJORITY in what would Become 'Israel'.


1. When Israel was set up in 1947, the area designated was a clear Majority Jewish area; 538,000 Jews and 397,000 Arabs.
(note: The latter 'Arabs' also including other non-jews)
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Jews were a Minority ONLY in Overall Palestine. (the Arabs rejected the near 100% Arab state)
As too land...
Jews, about 1/3 of the population, got 50+% of the Land.
Of course HALF of the Jews HALF was the Thought-useless, near-empty, Negev DESERT, thrown in for viabiliy sake.
IOW, Jews got about 1/4 of the USABLE/ARABLE Land.
IOW, they got LESS of the arable land than their number justifies.

You LOSE AGAIN my Arabist friend
SQOOOSH #97!
You Can't Debate Me Goofy!
`

Talk about deception, deflection and tap dancing. The Jews received more than half of Palestine and were less than a third of the population of Palestine. Non-Jews received less than half of Palestine and were 2/3s of the population of Palestine.

Give it up.
 
The JEWS OWN PALESTINE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW and you cant alter it
:link::link::link::link::link:

How many more times do you need the same link, and then ignore it.

Read the Mandate for Palestine it is in there

Phoney, I think that you will find that it is "CUSTOMARY" to post a link to support your wild claims!

No matter how many times you make wild claims you still fail to post supporting links!

The problem with links is that anyone can find links to support any claim on any position on any issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom