Let us compare my proof of who brings guns there...
View attachment 139868
with your proof from your link to the israeli, jewish times of israel...
View attachment 139869
LMAO at this entire line of idiocy that you have taken.
There are five dead people! And you are trying to tell me the terrorists didn't have guns? And then you call me an idiot?
Where, exactly, in the chain of events are you disagreeing?
1. three terrorists entered the Temple Mount compound without guns (proven by video surveillance)
2. three terrorists left the Temple Mount compound with guns (proven by video surveillance and dead people)
3. therefore, the terrorists must have obtained the guns they used inside the Temple Mount compound
With me so far?
4. non-Muslim visitors must pass through metal detectors to access the Temple Mount and could not have brought guns
5. Muslims were not required to pass through metal detectors to access the Temple Mount and could have brought guns
6. a Muslim visitor entered the Temple Mount carrying a large bag (proven by video surveillance)
7. three terrorists met with the bag-carrying man inside the compound (proven by video surveillance)
8. bag-carrying visitor left the compound without bag (proven by video surveillance)
9. terrorists had obtained guns
Its a simple explanation. Why are you arguing against it? Its foolish. Obviously someone brought guns to the compound. If not a Muslim collaborator then who?