Palestinians Can't Get Enough War

[Challenger]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

 

[gtopa1]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

You call hamas a source??

Greg

 

[eagle1462010]

There are two sides in a War..............People must pick a side....................

I choose Israel and wish them Godspeed in the destruction of Hamas and Radical Islamic sects........

Good Hunting IDF............To those that disagree..........

You can kiss my rebel ass.

 

[Challenger]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

You call hamas a source??

Greg

I'll happily stand corrected, but I don't recall ever using Hamas as a source.

 

[Challenger]

There are two sides in a War..............People must pick a side....................

I choose Israel and wish them Godspeed in the destruction of Hamas and Radical Islamic sects........

Good Hunting IDF............To those that disagree..........

You can kiss my rebel ass.

No problem, just take your trousers down and bend right over...

 

[gtopa1]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

You call hamas a source??

Greg

I'll happily stand corrected, but I don't recall ever using Hamas as a source.

You have used their statements about casualties in Gaza, no?? Did you express outrage at the bystanders who were TARGETED by Israel like Hamas said?

Check the origins of the "facts".

Greg

 

[Challenger]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

You call hamas a source??

Greg

I'll happily stand corrected, but I don't recall ever using Hamas as a source.

You have used their statements about casualties in Gaza, no?? Did you express outrage at the bystanders who were TARGETED by Israel like Hamas said?

Check the origins of the "facts".

Greg

I really have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[MJB12741]

There are two sides in a War..............People must pick a side....................

I choose Israel and wish them Godspeed in the destruction of Hamas and Radical Islamic sects........

Good Hunting IDF............To those that disagree..........

You can kiss my rebel ass.

Thank goodness us Americans have AIPAC. As long is we have AIPAC, there will be no sharia law in the USA.

 

[Challenger]

There are two sides in a War..............People must pick a side....................

I choose Israel and wish them Godspeed in the destruction of Hamas and Radical Islamic sects........

Good Hunting IDF............To those that disagree..........

You can kiss my rebel ass.

Thank goodness us Americans have AIPAC. As long is we have AIPAC, there will be no sharia law in the USA.

No Sharia Law in the USA? Tell that to Dearborn, Michigan. Here's a good article about Sharia

Sharia Law In The USA 101 A Guide To What It Is And Why States Want To Ban It

 

[aris2chat]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

all the land does not belong to one palestinian
state owned/controled the land and it's distribution. Ottoman wanted jews in the holy land.
there was no palestnian state.
Jews had right to buy and develop land, including unregistered or abandoned land. State has a right to claim land for security or infrastructure needs.

 

[Hossfly]

There are two sides in a War..............People must pick a side....................

I choose Israel and wish them Godspeed in the destruction of Hamas and Radical Islamic sects........

Good Hunting IDF............To those that disagree..........

You can kiss my rebel ass.

Thank goodness us Americans have AIPAC. As long is we have AIPAC, there will be no sharia law in the USA.

No Sharia Law in the USA? Tell that to Dearborn, Michigan. Here's a good article about Sharia

Sharia Law In The USA 101 A Guide To What It Is And Why States Want To Ban It

After ISIS is crushed (because they want Sharia Law), we'll see how long Sharia Law fares in Dearborn. I'm guessing that if any American troops die because of ISIS, there will be a gathering of American Patriots in Dearborn. I have my stuff packed, oiled up and ready to go.

 

[Forester]

After ISIS is crushed (because they want Sharia Law), we'll see how long Sharia Law fares in Dearborn. I'm guessing that if any American troops die because of ISIS, there will be a gathering of American Patriots in Dearborn. I have my stuff packed, oiled up and ready to go.

And what precisely is it that you have planned for Dearborn, Hoss? You do realize terrorism is still illegal don't you?

 

[Humanity]

There are two sides in a War..............People must pick a side....................

I choose Israel and wish them Godspeed in the destruction of Hamas and Radical Islamic sects........

Good Hunting IDF............To those that disagree..........

You can kiss my rebel ass.

Thank goodness us Americans have AIPAC. As long is we have AIPAC, there will be no sharia law in the USA.

No Sharia Law in the USA? Tell that to Dearborn, Michigan. Here's a good article about Sharia

Sharia Law In The USA 101 A Guide To What It Is And Why States Want To Ban It

After ISIS is crushed (because they want Sharia Law), we'll see how long Sharia Law fares in Dearborn. I'm guessing that if any American troops die because of ISIS, there will be a gathering of American Patriots in Dearborn. I have my stuff packed, oiled up and ready to go.

YEE HAW Hoss.... Ride 'em cowboy!!

And just because I love this video so much...

 

[montelatici]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

You call hamas a source??

Greg

I'll happily stand corrected, but I don't recall ever using Hamas as a source.

You have used their statements about casualties in Gaza, no?? Did you express outrage at the bystanders who were TARGETED by Israel like Hamas said?

Check the origins of the "facts".

Greg

The UN?

 

[gtopa1]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Isn't it strange then that the Arab propaganda is the best in the world, and a petty anti-Semite like you swallows it all up and calls Zionists liars.. You had better be quick about your conversion because pretty soon your own country will be following Sharia Law. I remember a Pakistani poster bragging that this is how it will be in the future. However, when this happen, you can claim that the land always belonged to the Muslims.

The Jews took no one 8217 s land

OMG! Joseph Farah, really? You call that a source.....

You call hamas a source??

Greg

I'll happily stand corrected, but I don't recall ever using Hamas as a source.

You have used their statements about casualties in Gaza, no?? Did you express outrage at the bystanders who were TARGETED by Israel like Hamas said?

Check the origins of the "facts".

Greg

The UN?

No: they received their data from Hamas. It MAY be true but frankly I will await verification.

Greg

 

[MHunterB]

It don't matter one little bit.

If there was just one Palestinian there, the land was his. It was not the right of invading Russian emerges to take it by force.

As it is, historians have your claim down as a lie. Apart from some Zionist historians, but 'Zionist' is a synonym for 'Compulsive Liar'.

Beez, when a poster makes such patently ridiculous malapropped (for lack of a more exact word) comments as your first 'statement', it's unreasonable to take them seriously.

Your second 'statement', while also a classic canard, is more recognizable as an expression of complete unwillingness to even acknowledge that there is 'another side', let alone to consider other views.

Such intransigence bodes no good for any resolution to the current unhappy situation. Of course I didn't suppose you'd chosen your nom de chat to present yourself as a deep thinker or one seeking cooperation.......