'Palestinian'

Europeans, by definition, cannot be Palestinians. Europe is on a different continent. The origin of the Europeans that practiced Judaism was European, not Middle Eastern.

The question of 'origin' is very simple.
Where did Jews begin originally?

Surely they didn't appear first in Europe :)

European converts to Judaism appeared first in Europe, just as Europeans that converted to Christianity did.
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?
 
Europeans, by definition, cannot be Palestinians. Europe is on a different continent. The origin of the Europeans that practiced Judaism was European, not Middle Eastern.

The question of 'origin' is very simple.
Where did Jews begin originally?

Surely they didn't appear first in Europe :)

European converts to Judaism appeared first in Europe, just as Europeans that converted to Christianity did.

False equivalence doesn't make an argument.
 
Europeans, by definition, cannot be Palestinians. Europe is on a different continent. The origin of the Europeans that practiced Judaism was European, not Middle Eastern.

The question of 'origin' is very simple.
Where did Jews begin originally?

Surely they didn't appear first in Europe :)

European converts to Judaism appeared first in Europe, just as Europeans that converted to Christianity did.

False equivalence doesn't make an argument.

It's just a fact. There is no argument.
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?

When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.
 
Europeans, by definition, cannot be Palestinians. Europe is on a different continent. The origin of the Europeans that practiced Judaism was European, not Middle Eastern.

The question of 'origin' is very simple.
Where did Jews begin originally?

Surely they didn't appear first in Europe :)

European converts to Judaism appeared first in Europe, just as Europeans that converted to Christianity did.

False equivalence doesn't make an argument.

It's just a fact. There is no argument.

Well for it to be a fact it at least has to be backed by some authoritative source. You're not one.
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?

When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?

When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.
 
How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.
Though there is no universal 'right', many countries extend privileges to Ethnics of that Nation.
When 'Palestink' becomes a country (choke), they can, and no doubt will, extend those privileges to 'palestinians' of every stripe/multiple ancestry.
 
How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.
Though there is no universal 'right', many countries extend privileges to Ethnics of that Nation.
When 'Palestink' becomes a country (choke), they can, and no doubt will, extend those privileges to 'palestinians' of every stripe/multiple ancestry.

So, you think it would be necessary to first transfer and remove every Jew—

Absolutely. No, I’m not saying to transfer every Jew, I’m saying transfer Jews who, after an agreement with Israel, fall under the jurisdiction of a Palestinian state.

Any Jew who is inside the borders of Palestine will have to leave?

Absolutely. I think this is a very necessary step, before we can allow the two states to somehow develop their separate national identities, and then maybe open up the doors for all kinds of cultural, social, political, economic exchanges, that freedom of movement of both citizens of Israelis and Palestinians from one area to another. You know you have to think of the day after.

The Palestinian ambassador to Washington
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?

When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.

What are you talking about. A non-Catholic goes through a process of conversion to become a Catholic.

So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations, have more rights to Palestine than descendants of the indigenous people that left Judaism.
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?

When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.

What are you talking about. A non-Catholic goes through a process of conversion to become a Catholic.

So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations, have more rights to Palestine than descendants of the indigenous people that left Judaism.

What?? What a mess have You done. Ancestry and religion are different things.

We have been over this before.
You Yourself provided the proofs that Jews of any diaspora are the closest to Palestinians, before any other ME community.
 
Does an Inuit convert to Judaism have ancestral origins in the Middle East?

When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.

What are you talking about. A non-Catholic goes through a process of conversion to become a Catholic.

So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations, have more rights to Palestine than descendants of the indigenous people that left Judaism.

What?? What a mess have You done. Ancestry and religion are different things.

We have been over this before.
You Yourself provided the proofs that Jews of any diaspora are the closest to Palestinians, before any other ME community.

Except for the few Jews who have married Arabs willfully, or were forced into marriages or conversion to Islam, the Palestinian Arabs are exactly that. Arabs.
Why should Arabs be the closest to Jews, and not the indigenous Egyptians, Assyrians, and others who have also had contact and a small or higher number of integration for the past 2500 years.
How about the Romans, or the Greeks.

This "Jews and Palestinians" are closely related is nothing but a way to continue to delegitimize and basically wipe out any Jewish vestige as he just did above.

Jews disappeared into converting to Christianity and Islam.

No matter what the proof to the contrary he will continue to try to sell this "saying" of his, because he "knows more than anyone and we will never learn what he knows", something to that effect.

In a few words:

He Knows Nothing
He is into delegitimizing and recruiting more people to attack Israel and the Jews.
Jew hatred makes people like Monte deny that Jews even exist, or if they do they are connected to the "Palestinian Arabs", AND
Theodore Herzl and all other Jews who happened to come from Europe are Europeans. Of course it does not make any other people European if they spent a few centuries in Europe.
ONLY THE JEWS.

AND never mind all the other Jews who make up the Jewish people, from Mesopotamia, Iran, and all over the world.

Monte and CO. zero in on Herzl and all the Jews who came from Europe and returned to their ancient homeland and have decided that they are "Converted Jews" . ALL OF THEM.

Monte does not believe what he tries to sell.
He knows that all he is posting on the threads are lies, which have been debunked several time by several people, by the facts themselves.

Keep repeating what you love to peddle.

Jews are Jews.

If Jews are not Jews, than Arabs are not Arabs, and Palestinian Arabs are most definitely NOT the indigenous people of ancient Canaan, because their ancestors, unlike the Jewish People's ancestors, did not inhabit ancient Canaan until the Muslim invasion of 1400 years ago.
Jews were inhabiting that land long before 1400 years ago. Never stopped inhabiting it, and will continue to inhabit their indigenous Ancient Homeland for perpetuity.


Sure, Monte does not like this facts, and neither do others like him.

But such is life.

L'Echaim
 
When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.

What are you talking about. A non-Catholic goes through a process of conversion to become a Catholic.

So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations, have more rights to Palestine than descendants of the indigenous people that left Judaism.

What?? What a mess have You done. Ancestry and religion are different things.

We have been over this before.
You Yourself provided the proofs that Jews of any diaspora are the closest to Palestinians, before any other ME community.

Except for the few Jews who have married Arabs willfully, or were forced into marriages or conversion to Islam, the Palestinian Arabs are exactly that. Arabs.
Why should Arabs be the closest to Jews, and not the indigenous Egyptians, Assyrians, and others who have also had contact and a small or higher number of integration for the past 2500 years.
How about the Romans, or the Greeks.

This "Jews and Palestinians" are closely related is nothing but a way to continue to delegitimize and basically wipe out any Jewish vestige as he just did above.

Jews disappeared into converting to Christianity and Islam.

No matter what the proof to the contrary he will continue to try to sell this "saying" of his, because he "knows more than anyone and we will never learn what he knows", something to that effect.

In a few words:

He Knows Nothing
He is into delegitimizing and recruiting more people to attack Israel and the Jews.
Jew hatred makes people like Monte deny that Jews even exist, or if they do they are connected to the "Palestinian Arabs", AND
Theodore Herzl and all other Jews who happened to come from Europe are Europeans. Of course it does not make any other people European if they spent a few centuries in Europe.
ONLY THE JEWS.

AND never mind all the other Jews who make up the Jewish people, from Mesopotamia, Iran, and all over the world.

Monte and CO. zero in on Herzl and all the Jews who came from Europe and returned to their ancient homeland and have decided that they are "Converted Jews" . ALL OF THEM.

Monte does not believe what he tries to sell.
He knows that all he is posting on the threads are lies, which have been debunked several time by several people, by the facts themselves.

Keep repeating what you love to peddle.

Jews are Jews.

If Jews are not Jews, than Arabs are not Arabs, and Palestinian Arabs are most definitely NOT the indigenous people of ancient Canaan, because their ancestors, unlike the Jewish People's ancestors, did not inhabit ancient Canaan until the Muslim invasion of 1400 years ago.
Jews were inhabiting that land long before 1400 years ago. Never stopped inhabiting it, and will continue to inhabit their indigenous Ancient Homeland for perpetuity.


Sure, Monte does not like this facts, and neither do others like him.

But such is life.

L'Echaim

1. Arab is not a racial or ethnic construct, it is the appellation given to people who have adopted Arabic as a language.
2. The Palestinians are predominately the descendants of the indigenous people of the territory. The impact of Arabian DNA was minimal as the Arabians did not transfer a population to Palestine, them came to rule over the native people, much like the Romans and later the Ottomans.
3. People in Palestine that had not already converted to Christianity (and many had already) that practiced many different religions including Roman religions, Judaism, Samaritanism, Mithraism etc., overwhelmingly converted to Christianity after Christianity became the state religion of Rome. This happened all over the Empire, not just in Palestine.
4. No one has denied the existence of Jews. A Jew is anyone that practices Judaism. There are Inuits that practice Judaism, there are Asians that practice Judaism. It's a religion that people of different ethnicites and races practice.

What we are denying is the right that those that practiced Judaism in Europe had, to invade a place on another continent, expropriate the land from the native people of Palestine, expel hundreds of thousands, kill we don't know how many but surely in the tens of thousands and continue to oppress and rule over several million of them to this day.

I see that the facts are driving Mr. Propaganda (60s fan) nuts. Nothing I have stated has been debunked, facts cannot be debunked. You can find Hasbara sources that try to deflect the facts, but that's it.

Ciao, cioa.
 
They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.

What are you talking about. A non-Catholic goes through a process of conversion to become a Catholic.

So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations, have more rights to Palestine than descendants of the indigenous people that left Judaism.

What?? What a mess have You done. Ancestry and religion are different things.

We have been over this before.
You Yourself provided the proofs that Jews of any diaspora are the closest to Palestinians, before any other ME community.

Except for the few Jews who have married Arabs willfully, or were forced into marriages or conversion to Islam, the Palestinian Arabs are exactly that. Arabs.
Why should Arabs be the closest to Jews, and not the indigenous Egyptians, Assyrians, and others who have also had contact and a small or higher number of integration for the past 2500 years.
How about the Romans, or the Greeks.

This "Jews and Palestinians" are closely related is nothing but a way to continue to delegitimize and basically wipe out any Jewish vestige as he just did above.

Jews disappeared into converting to Christianity and Islam.

No matter what the proof to the contrary he will continue to try to sell this "saying" of his, because he "knows more than anyone and we will never learn what he knows", something to that effect.

In a few words:

He Knows Nothing
He is into delegitimizing and recruiting more people to attack Israel and the Jews.
Jew hatred makes people like Monte deny that Jews even exist, or if they do they are connected to the "Palestinian Arabs", AND
Theodore Herzl and all other Jews who happened to come from Europe are Europeans. Of course it does not make any other people European if they spent a few centuries in Europe.
ONLY THE JEWS.

AND never mind all the other Jews who make up the Jewish people, from Mesopotamia, Iran, and all over the world.

Monte and CO. zero in on Herzl and all the Jews who came from Europe and returned to their ancient homeland and have decided that they are "Converted Jews" . ALL OF THEM.

Monte does not believe what he tries to sell.
He knows that all he is posting on the threads are lies, which have been debunked several time by several people, by the facts themselves.

Keep repeating what you love to peddle.

Jews are Jews.

If Jews are not Jews, than Arabs are not Arabs, and Palestinian Arabs are most definitely NOT the indigenous people of ancient Canaan, because their ancestors, unlike the Jewish People's ancestors, did not inhabit ancient Canaan until the Muslim invasion of 1400 years ago.
Jews were inhabiting that land long before 1400 years ago. Never stopped inhabiting it, and will continue to inhabit their indigenous Ancient Homeland for perpetuity.


Sure, Monte does not like this facts, and neither do others like him.

But such is life.

L'Echaim

1. Arab is not a racial or ethnic construct, it is the appellation given to people who have adopted Arabic as a language.
2. The Palestinians are predominately the descendants of the indigenous people of the territory. The impact of Arabian DNA was minimal as the Arabians did not transfer a population to Palestine, them came to rule over the native people, much like the Romans and later the Ottomans.
3. People in Palestine that had not already converted to Christianity (and many had already) that practiced many different religions including Roman religions, Judaism, Samaritanism, Mithraism etc., overwhelmingly converted to Christianity after Christianity became the state religion of Rome. This happened all over the Empire, not just in Palestine.
4. No one has denied the existence of Jews. A Jew is anyone that practices Judaism. There are Inuits that practice Judaism, there are Asians that practice Judaism. It's a religion that people of different ethnicites and races practice.

What we are denying is the right that those that practiced Judaism in Europe had, to invade a place on another continent, expropriate the land from the native people of Palestine, expel hundreds of thousands, kill we don't know how many but surely in the tens of thousands and continue to oppress and rule over several million of them to this day.

I see that the facts are driving Mr. Propaganda (60s fan) nuts. Nothing I have stated has been debunked, facts cannot be debunked. You can find Hasbara sources that try to deflect the facts, but that's it.

Ciao, cioa.


<<What we are denying is the right that those that practiced Judaism in Europe had, to invade a place on another continent, expropriate the land from the native people of Palestine, expel hundreds of thousands, kill we don't know how many but surely in the tens of thousands and continue to oppress and rule over several million of them to this day.>>>

Never mind the rest.

YOU ARE SO FULLLLLL OF IT !!!!!!

Returning to one's indigenous homeland is not "Invading", no matter how many times you repeat it.

And Israel did not expel thousands of Arabs before, during and after the 1948 war, as proven by the hundreds of Arab tribes which remained on the land during and after the war.

And Israel does not "Rule" over the people of Gaza or the PA. They
have their own governments and are ruled by those governments.
All those governments have to do and put their weapons down, destroy their charters, and sign a Peace Treaty with Israel as Egypt and Jordan have done.

It is Ramadan.

Israel is under no obligation to allow Muslims to come to the Temple Mount to pray at their Mosques. But it does so every time.
Muslims did not allow Jews access to their Holy Sites for centuries.

Show us proof that the Hashemites allowed Jews access to their holy sites between 1948 and 1967.

Show us that the Hashemites, who have no rights to any lands in TransJordan or Judea and Samaria (being indigenous of Arabia and moved to TransJordan only around WWI when the Said Clan of Yemen made them run) did not murder and/or expel ALL the Jews of Judea, Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem in 1948.
Jews who were living there for centuries, even before the Arabs invaded in the 7th Century.

Arabs are not a race or an ethnicity, just as Jews are?
Only a language?
Then there are no British people, only people who speak English?
No Spaniards, Spanish people, only people who speak Spanish.
Sure. If you say so.


What you do need to start 'denying' is the "right" of Muslims to want all Jews to continue to be dhimmis to Muslims, and never, ever be allowed to be sovereign of their own fate.
Or give the Muslims the 'right' to lose and not feel ashamed, that their 'honor' has been compromised and they must reconquer, even if it means killing all, just to have their "Honor" back.

What you do need to start doing is giving Jews (They have been a People Nation for the past 3000 years) the right to their ancient homeland. It is called The Land of Israel, and falls exactly where the whole Mandate for Palestine did in 1920.

That land which got suddenly shrunk by the British when they gave the foreigners Hashemites Arabs 77% of that land.

That land which got even smaller when Israel retreated from Gaza in 2006.

It does not matter if you are an Arab, a Muslim or a Christian.

You do not have the right to tell any Jew that the Land of Israel is not their, that they have 'stolen" that land from any other native people, as they did not steal it from the Jews who were already living there (the only ones who were native to the land).

The Jews have not expelled any 'native' people from the Land of Israel, or kept them under 'occupation', ruling over them.

As you do speak fluent Arabic, you know very well what the Arab leaders say. That there are no Palestinian People.
That the idea of a Palestinian People is being used only to destroy Israel and take the land Israel is on right now.

Deny it if you will. Arabs telling lies?
Not Mohammad, not Husseini, not Arafat, not Abbas, Mashall, or any other Arab leader, Imam, professor, etc.

Arabs do not lie, isn't that right?
 
You are hilarious and it demonstrates why you people can't be taken seriously.

"Returning to one's indigenous homeland is not "Invading", no matter how many times you repeat it."

Europeans are not indigenous to the Middle East. Even if the European Zionists had a some ancestry in the Middle East, after 2,000 years they would have no right to expel the indigenous and native people, descendants of ancestors had lived there for 3-4 thousand years. The Roma are indigenous to Northwestern India/Pakistan and have remained far more closed as a society than the European Jews. They even look like Indians. How do you think the people in India would feel about the UN partitioning an Indian state to make room for the Roma? And they left northwestern India less than 1500 years ago.

"And Israel did not expel thousands of Arabs before, during and after the 1948 war,"

That's the problem with you people. Basic facts that don't coincide with your propaganda are just denied by you.

"The Jews have not expelled any 'native' people from the Land of Israel, or kept them under 'occupation', ruling over them."

You are out of your mind. Again, you deny facts that no one disputes except maniacs like you.

By the way, I have the right to state the truth to Jews or anyone else. Who do you think you are, punk.
 
15th post
You are hilarious and it demonstrates why you people can't be taken seriously.

"Returning to one's indigenous homeland is not "Invading", no matter how many times you repeat it."

Europeans are not indigenous to the Middle East. Even if the European Zionists had a some ancestry in the Middle East, after 2,000 years they would have no right to expel the indigenous and native people, descendants of ancestors had lived there for 3-4 thousand years. The Roma are indigenous to Northwestern India/Pakistan and have remained far more closed as a society than the European Jews. They even look like Indians. How do you think the people in India would feel about the UN partitioning an Indian state to make room for the Roma? And they left northwestern India less than 1500 years ago.

"And Israel did not expel thousands of Arabs before, during and after the 1948 war,"

That's the problem with you people. Basic facts that don't coincide with your propaganda are just denied by you.

"The Jews have not expelled any 'native' people from the Land of Israel, or kept them under 'occupation', ruling over them."

You are out of your mind. Again, you deny facts that no one disputes except maniacs like you.

By the way, I have the right to state the truth to Jews or anyone else. Who do you think you are, punk.


<after 2,000 years they would have no right to expel the indigenous and native people, descendants of ancestors had lived there for 3-4 thousand years.>

Arabs have not been in Ancient Canaan for 4000 years. That is your lie.

Arabs have never been native of any other region except the Arabian Peninsula.

Palestinians are Arabs

This punk has the right to call you on all of your lies, designed to discredit, delegitimize the indigenous people of Ancient Canaan, who have been mistreated for the past 1400 years by the murderous Arab Muslims who invaded and committed endless crimes against the indigenous people of the Land. The Jews.

And this "punk" will continue to do so.
 
So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations ...

That is a silly claim. If a "European" had only one ancestor who came 2000 years ago from Israel, it is unlikely in the extreme that the Jewish culture would be preserved, intact, over the course of those 2000 years. The fact that the Jewish culture was preserved over such a long period of time supports the idea that many generations of Jewish people invested in preserving it.

But at least we've got you to accept that there WAS a Jewish diaspora into Europe.
 
... the European Zionists had a some ancestry in the Middle East, after 2,000 years they would have no right to expel the ... people, descendants of ancestors had lived there for 3-4 thousand years. The Roma are indigenous to Northwestern India/Pakistan and have remained far more closed as a society than the European Jews. They even look like Indians. How do you think the people in India would feel about the UN partitioning an Indian state to make room for the Roma? And they left northwestern India less than 1500 years ago.

Well, international law and the moral codes it is based on isn't based on "feelings" now, is it? ISIS "feels" like we should all be living under an Arab Muslim Caliphate, right?

And besides that, PLENTY of new nations have developed over the past hundred years or so to give sovereignty to ethnic/cultural groups who have a history in their territory of origin. And there are several groups still working toward that goal who have not yet achieved it.

If you want to argue that once a ethnic/cultural group has been successfully expelled from their territory -- they no longer have rights to it, go ahead. But you can't have it both ways. It means you are arguing that the Arab Palestinians have no rights to Israel.
 
When a convert marries a Jew and live in the community, after 3-5 generations they certainly become part of the family.
Converts don't go through the process of conversion to marry Catholics.

They never miraculously develop ancestors from the Middle East. They are Europeans and have European ancestors. The descendants of the the Jews of Palestine are the current Muslims and Christians of Palestine.

How is that in every thread You come to Eugenics?

But anyway, let's say Your daughter marries a Mongol, has a child. Then Your grandchild marries another Mongol. And so on with natural variations of life.
Where did the Mongol line disappear? And I haven't even mention the usual ethnic signs... The offspring carries both ancestry, the location of birth is irrelevant.

What are you talking about. A non-Catholic goes through a process of conversion to become a Catholic.

So, a European who had one ancestor 2,000 years who came from the Middle East married a European woman, who subsequently had children that married other Europeans for generations, have more rights to Palestine than descendants of the indigenous people that left Judaism.

What?? What a mess have You done. Ancestry and religion are different things.

We have been over this before.
You Yourself provided the proofs that Jews of any diaspora are the closest to Palestinians, before any other ME community.

Except for the few Jews who have married Arabs willfully, or were forced into marriages or conversion to Islam, the Palestinian Arabs are exactly that. Arabs.
Why should Arabs be the closest to Jews, and not the indigenous Egyptians, Assyrians, and others who have also had contact and a small or higher number of integration for the past 2500 years.
How about the Romans, or the Greeks.

This "Jews and Palestinians" are closely related is nothing but a way to continue to delegitimize and basically wipe out any Jewish vestige as he just did above.

Jews disappeared into converting to Christianity and Islam.

No matter what the proof to the contrary he will continue to try to sell this "saying" of his, because he "knows more than anyone and we will never learn what he knows", something to that effect.

In a few words:

He Knows Nothing
He is into delegitimizing and recruiting more people to attack Israel and the Jews.
Jew hatred makes people like Monte deny that Jews even exist, or if they do they are connected to the "Palestinian Arabs", AND
Theodore Herzl and all other Jews who happened to come from Europe are Europeans. Of course it does not make any other people European if they spent a few centuries in Europe.
ONLY THE JEWS.

AND never mind all the other Jews who make up the Jewish people, from Mesopotamia, Iran, and all over the world.

Monte and CO. zero in on Herzl and all the Jews who came from Europe and returned to their ancient homeland and have decided that they are "Converted Jews" . ALL OF THEM.

Monte does not believe what he tries to sell.
He knows that all he is posting on the threads are lies, which have been debunked several time by several people, by the facts themselves.

Keep repeating what you love to peddle.

Jews are Jews.

If Jews are not Jews, than Arabs are not Arabs, and Palestinian Arabs are most definitely NOT the indigenous people of ancient Canaan, because their ancestors, unlike the Jewish People's ancestors, did not inhabit ancient Canaan until the Muslim invasion of 1400 years ago.
Jews were inhabiting that land long before 1400 years ago. Never stopped inhabiting it, and will continue to inhabit their indigenous Ancient Homeland for perpetuity.


Sure, Monte does not like this facts, and neither do others like him.

But such is life.

L'Echaim

Totally with You on that!
I'm just using Montelatici's sources to show his hypocrisy.
He doesn't read what his sources say, and they usually contradict him:)
 
Back
Top Bottom