'Palestinian'

[Hollie]

Mmm...not so much. Your argument is based on an ex-wikipedia article categorised as in "need of cleaning up" and "lacking reliable references from November 2008", without any supporting data presented History of the Southern Levant

The current Wikipedia article on the Demographic History of Palestine, Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia goes into a lot more detail and is fully referenced.

This article completely contradicts your hypothesis of the Jewish population of the region being anywhere close to 25%. The data is clear that in terms of total population Jewish people comprised at best 3% in the 16th Century which dwindled to around 0.8% in the 17th century. The only parts of Palestine where there was a Jewish population anywhere close to your 25%, could be found in the cities of Tiberias (35% of total households registered) and Safad (28% of total households registered).

So after centuries of wars and inner struggles in Palestine, the Jews were still present?

Those Palestinian Jews...

No-one has ever said that judaism was completely eradicated from the region; it's impossible to eradicate an idea. That said, most of the Jewish population in the 16th and 17th Centuries were religious immigrants from Spain and other parts of Europe,so were never actually indigenous then, just like now. The whole Zionist concept of "return" and "redemption" is a just myth used to justify the appropriation of territory.

".... because the prayer leader at the madrassah told me so."

There. Fixed that for you, muhammud.

 

[Hollie]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

 

[Challenger]

Mmm...not so much. Your argument is based on an ex-wikipedia article categorised as in "need of cleaning up" and "lacking reliable references from November 2008", without any supporting data presented History of the Southern Levant
The current Wikipedia article on the Demographic History of Palestine, Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia goes into a lot more detail and is fully referenced.
This article completely contradicts your hypothesis of the Jewish population of the region being anywhere close to 25%. The data is clear that in terms of total population Jewish people comprised at best 3% in the 16th Century which dwindled to around 0.8% in the 17th century. The only parts of Palestine where there was a Jewish population anywhere close to your 25%, could be found in the cities of Tiberias (35% of total households registered) and Safad (28% of otal households registered).

My posts are sourced and Footnoted. Even the one you acknowledge, says the Jews in Safed alone were up to 30,000 of app 200,000 population/15% by 1600, and there were other Jewish areas, and it of course grewe further until 1660...
Completely validating my numbers.

But just using Safed-1600 alone, your Lying number "3%" would make Palestine's population at least 1 Million instead of the 200,000 it was.
It didn't hit 1 Million until 1930!
LOFL Adolph.
That's what JOO HATE does to you Adolph. Makes an obvious Liar.
I Hate Liars like you and Mont el tici (who said there were virtually No Jews), and I'm Porking your Lying asses.
`

Nice try attempting to extrapolate figures for Tiberias and Safed, throughout the whole region. Those two cities were the main population centres; Jerusalem itself only had 0.06% of total households registered as "Jewish", Hebron 0.03%, Nablus 0.0009%, and Acre 0.0016%

The number of households registered as Jewish by the Ottomans overall, comprised 0.03% of all households registered in the region.

Your post may well be sourced and footnoted, but the article itself failed to live up to Wikipedia standards on reliable references and there was no supporting data presented to quatify the assertion that 25% of the population of Palestine were Jewish at that time.

 

[Challenger]

Shit like that happens when you are born under occupation.

Or when You have no significant cultural or historic connection to the land.

So much that You have to wait centuries before a foreign power decides to invent a flag for You...so much for native people.

Palestinians 'became a people' as a result of the occupation- not in spite of it.

The Palestinians became citizens of Palestine in 1924.

Citizens of the Magical Kingdom of Disney PallyLand.

Another hollow post from Hollie, nothing of substance, moving on...

More pointless taqiyya from the spammer.

Whatever...moving on.

 

[Challenger]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

 

[Hollie]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

The most unique thing about Palestine is its diversity in race, religion, and culture.

 

[Hollie]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

The most unique thing about Palestine is its diversity in race, religion, and culture.

As the self-designated spokes-turban for the arabs-moslems, you need to keep up. The most unique thing about middle Eastern Islamist fascism is its relation to Arab'ism. Just ask your heroes in the PLO.

From the 1968 charter:

Article 1:
Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people; it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland, and the Palestinian people are an integral part of the Arab nation.


Not much allowance there for your phony claims to "diversity...."

 

[Challenger]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

...and straight back to the vacuous and insubstantial hate filled drivel Hollie is famous for posting, hey-ho. Clearly she has nothing of substance to contribute. Next.

 

[Challenger]

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

The most unique thing about Palestine is its diversity in race, religion, and culture.

As the self-designated spokes-turban for the arabs-moslems, you need to keep up. The most unique thing about middle Eastern Islamist fascism is its relation to Arab'ism. Just ask your heroes in the PLO.

From the 1968 charter:

Article 1:
Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people; it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland, and the Palestinian people are an integral part of the Arab nation.


Not much allowance there for your phony claims to "diversity...."

Looks like "Stuck in the sixties" is not the only Hasbara troll here stuck in the 60's; now we have Hollie too. Next.

 

[Hollie]

Why is everything portrayed as 'palestinian' comes from foreign places and cultures?

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

...and straight back to the vacuous and insubstantial hate filled drivel Hollie is famous for posting, hey-ho. Clearly she has nothing of substance to contribute. Next.

And here you are, as usual, unable to substantiate your baseless claims so you're left to childish tantrums.

Time out for, Mo'. Off to your room. Scoot.

 

[Hollie]

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

The most unique thing about Palestine is its diversity in race, religion, and culture.

As the self-designated spokes-turban for the arabs-moslems, you need to keep up. The most unique thing about middle Eastern Islamist fascism is its relation to Arab'ism. Just ask your heroes in the PLO.

From the 1968 charter:

Article 1:
Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people; it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland, and the Palestinian people are an integral part of the Arab nation.


Not much allowance there for your phony claims to "diversity...."

Looks like "Stuck in the sixties" is not the only Hasbara troll here stuck in the 60's; now we have Hollie too. Next.

Looks like the angry, self-hater is left befuddled and unable to do anything but copy and paste slogans.

 

[abu afak]

Mmm...not so much. Your argument is based on an ex-wikipedia article categorised as in "need of cleaning up" and "lacking reliable references from November 2008", without any supporting data presented History of the Southern Levant
The current Wikipedia article on the Demographic History of Palestine, Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia goes into a lot more detail and is fully referenced.
This article completely contradicts your hypothesis of the Jewish population of the region being anywhere close to 25%. The data is clear that in terms of total population Jewish people comprised at best 3% in the 16th Century which dwindled to around 0.8% in the 17th century. The only parts of Palestine where there was a Jewish population anywhere close to your 25%, could be found in the cities of Tiberias (35% of total households registered) and Safad (28% of otal households registered).

My posts are sourced and Footnoted. Even the one you acknowledge, says the Jews in Safed alone were up to 30,000 of app 200,000 population/15% by 1600, and there were other Jewish areas, and it of course grewe further until 1660...
Completely validating my numbers.

But just using Safed-1600 alone, your Lying number "3%" would make Palestine's population at least 1 Million instead of the 200,000 it was.
It didn't hit 1 Million until 1930!
LOFL Adolph.
That's what JOO HATE does to you Adolph. Makes an obvious Liar.
I Hate Liars like you and Mont el tici (who said there were virtually No Jews), and I'm Porking your Lying asses.
`

Nice try attempting to extrapolate figures for Tiberias and Safed, throughout the whole region. Those two cities were the main population centres; Jerusalem itself only had 0.06% of total households registered as "Jewish", Hebron 0.03%, Nablus 0.0009%, and Acre 0.0016%

The number of households registered as Jewish by the Ottomans overall, comprised 0.03% of all households registered in the region.

Your post may well be sourced and footnoted, but the article itself failed to live up to Wikipedia standards on reliable references and there was no supporting data presented to quatify the assertion that 25% of the population of Palestine were Jewish at that time.

My posts are sourced and Footnoted. Even the one you acknowledge, says the Jews in Safed alone were up to 30,000 of app 200,000 population/15% by 1600, and there were other Jewish areas, and it of course grewe further until 1660...
Completely validating my numbers.

But just using Safed-1600 alone, your Lying number "3%" would make Palestine's population at least 1 Million instead of the 200,000 it was.
It didn't hit 1 Million until 1930!
LOFL Adolph.
That's what JOO HATE does to you Adolph. Makes an obvious Liar.
I Hate Liars like you and Mont el tici (who said there were virtually No Jews), and I'm Porking your Lying asses.

 

[montelatici]

Mmm...not so much. Your argument is based on an ex-wikipedia article categorised as in "need of cleaning up" and "lacking reliable references from November 2008", without any supporting data presented History of the Southern Levant
The current Wikipedia article on the Demographic History of Palestine, Demographic history of Palestine (region) - Wikipedia goes into a lot more detail and is fully referenced.
This article completely contradicts your hypothesis of the Jewish population of the region being anywhere close to 25%. The data is clear that in terms of total population Jewish people comprised at best 3% in the 16th Century which dwindled to around 0.8% in the 17th century. The only parts of Palestine where there was a Jewish population anywhere close to your 25%, could be found in the cities of Tiberias (35% of total households registered) and Safad (28% of otal households registered).

My posts are sourced and Footnoted. Even the one you acknowledge, says the Jews in Safed alone were up to 30,000 of app 200,000 population/15% by 1600, and there were other Jewish areas, and it of course grewe further until 1660...
Completely validating my numbers.

But just using Safed-1600 alone, your Lying number "3%" would make Palestine's population at least 1 Million instead of the 200,000 it was.
It didn't hit 1 Million until 1930!
LOFL Adolph.
That's what JOO HATE does to you Adolph. Makes an obvious Liar.
I Hate Liars like you and Mont el tici (who said there were virtually No Jews), and I'm Porking your Lying asses.
`

Nice try attempting to extrapolate figures for Tiberias and Safed, throughout the whole region. Those two cities were the main population centres; Jerusalem itself only had 0.06% of total households registered as "Jewish", Hebron 0.03%, Nablus 0.0009%, and Acre 0.0016%

The number of households registered as Jewish by the Ottomans overall, comprised 0.03% of all households registered in the region.

Your post may well be sourced and footnoted, but the article itself failed to live up to Wikipedia standards on reliable references and there was no supporting data presented to quatify the assertion that 25% of the population of Palestine were Jewish at that time.

My posts are sourced and Footnoted. Even the one you acknowledge, says the Jews in Safed alone were up to 30,000 of app 200,000 population/15% by 1600, and there were other Jewish areas, and it of course grewe further until 1660...
Completely validating my numbers.

But just using Safed-1600 alone, your Lying number "3%" would make Palestine's population at least 1 Million instead of the 200,000 it was.
It didn't hit 1 Million until 1930!
LOFL Adolph.
That's what JOO HATE does to you Adolph. Makes an obvious Liar.
I Hate Liars like you and Mont el tici (who said there were virtually No Jews), and I'm Porking your Lying asses.

Your sources are Hasbara sources. There were no Jews to speak of in Palestine until the Zionist invasion.

 

[abu afak]

Your sources are Hasbara sources. There were no Jews to speak of in Palestine until the Zionist invasion.

Be Glad to PORK you again Akhmed.
Neither you nor Adolph/Challenger has any COUNTER sources.
None. You are Both Empty Anti-Semite Clowns
AGAIN:

History of the Jews and Judaism in the Land of Israel - Wikipedia

"...The 16th-century nevertheless saw a resurgence of Jewish life in Palestine.
Palestinian rabbis were instrumental producing a universally accepted manual of Jewish law and some of the most beautiful liturgical poems. Much of this activity occurred at Safed which had become a spiritual centre, a haven for mystics. Joseph Karo's comprehensive guide to Jewish law, the Shulchan Aruch, was considered so authoritative that the variant customs of German-Polish Jewry were merely added as supplement glosses.[125] Some of the most celebrated hymns were written in Safed by poets such as Israel Najara and Solomon Alkabetz.[126] The town was also a centre of Jewish mysticism, notable kabbalists included Moses Cordovero and the German-born Naphtali Hertz ben Jacob Elhanan.[127][ A new method of understanding the kabbalah was developed by Palestinian mystic Isaac Luria, and espoused by his student Chaim Vital. In Safed, the Jews developed a number of branches of trade, especially in grain, spices, textiles and dyeing.

In 1577, a Hebrew printing press was established in Safed. The 8,000 or 10,000 Jews in Safed in 1555 grew to 20,000 or 30,000 by the end of the century.

In around 1563, Joseph Nasi secured permission from Sultan Selim II to acquire Tiberias and seven surrounding villages to create a Jewish city-state. [130] He hoped that large numbers of Jewish refugees and Marranos would settle there, free from fear and oppression; indeed, the persecuted Jews of Cori, Italy, numbering about 200 souls, decided to emigrate to Tiberias.[131] Nasi had the walls of the town rebuilt by 1564 and attempted to turn it into a self-sufficient textile manufacturing center by planting mulberry treesfor the cultivation of silk. Nevertheless, a number of factors during the following years contributed to the plan's ultimate failure. Nasi's aunt, Doña Gracia Mendes Nasi supported a yeshiva in the town for many years until her death in 1569.[133]

In 1567, a Yemenite scholar and Rabbi, Zechariah Dhahiri, visited Safed and wrote of his experiences in a book entitled Sefer Ha-Musar. His vivid descriptions of the town Safed and of Rabbi Joseph Karo's yeshivaare of primary importance to historians, seeing that they are a first-hand account of these places, and the only extant account which describes the yeshiva of the great Sephardic Rabbi, Joseph Karo.[134]

In 1576, the Jewish community of Safed faced an expulsion order: 1,000 prosperous families were to be deported to Cyprus, "for the good of the said island", with another 500 the following year.[135] The order was later rescinded due to the realisation of the financial gains of Jewish rental income.[136] In 1586, the Jews of Istanbul agreed to build a fortified khan to provide a refuge for Safed's Jews against "night bandits and armed thieves."[135]
[.....]
And it grew further
cont'd

In 1610, the Yochanan ben Zakai Synagogue in Jerusalem was completed.[137] It became the main synagogue of the Sephardic Jews, the place where their chief rabbi was invested. The adjacent study hall which had been added by 1625 later became the Synagogue of Elijah the Prophet.[137]

In the 1648–1654 Khmelnytsky Uprising in Ukraine over 100,000 Jews were massacred, leading to some migration to Israel. In 1660 (or 1662), the majorly Jewish towns of Safed and Tiberias are destroyed by the Druze, following a power struggle in Galilee.[138][139][140][141][142][143][144]....​

Thanks for the Bump, Page Top, and a reason to show everyone MontelCiti is a SICK Jew-Hating FRAUD.

 

[abu afak]

Your sources are Hasbara sources. There were no Jews to speak of in Palestine until the Zionist invasion.

Formerly Wikipedia, now on many of it's Mirror Websites.
History of the Southern Levant

Ottoman Period 1517-1917

In 1516 the Ottoman Turks occupied Palestine.[14] The country became part of the Ottoman Empire. Constantinople appointed local governors. Public works, including the city walls, were rebuilt in Jerusalem by Suleiman the Magnificent in 1537. An area around Tiberias was given to Don Joseph HaNasi for a Jewish enclave.
Following the expulsions from Spain, the Jewish population of Palestine rose to around 25% (includes non-Ottoman citizens, excludes Bedouin) and regained its former stronghold of Eastern Galilee. That ended in 1660 when they were massacred at Safed and Jerusalem. During the reign of Dahar al Omar, Pasha of the Galilee, Jews from Ukraine began to resettle Tiberias.".."​

That's what 100% Rebuttal looks like.
It's such a Monumental Misimpression/Fundamental error/LIE, Mont-al-cheeti should change his opinion of the conflict!
As I always say Cheeti... You're a FRAUD
You CANNOT Debate me.
Period.
Your-last-wording has only brought you More embarrassment.
NO rebuttal, just "hasbara" accusation BS.
I'm done with you now BOY, you can pull up your pants.
`

 

[montelatici]

Repeated posting of Hasbara edited wiki nonsense does not make your falsehoods any truer. I think we all know who is embarassing himself.

Even the Jewish Virtual Library, known for propagating Zionist propaganda, claims that there were only 5,000 Jews (1.7% of the population) in Palestine in the 16th century. Grow up you silly little twit.

Jewish & Non-Jewish Population of Israel/Palestine (1517-Present)

 

[abu afak]

Repeated posting of Hasbara edited wiki nonsense does not make your falsehoods any truer. I think we all know who is embarassing himself.
Even the Jewish Virtual Library, known for propagating Zionist propaganda, claims that there were only 5,000 Jews (1.7% of the population) in Palestine in the 16th century. Grow up you silly little twit.
Jewish & Non-Jewish Population of Israel/Palestine (1517-Present)

You Lying Taqiyyah Fraud.
There's NO Numbers between 1517 and 1882!
You DISHONEST stink bomb, it doesn't even touch the meat I posted: 1550-1660.

And BTW Akhmed, YOU are using a reliable Jewish source, aka, "Hasbara."
:^)
AS I always say
Montel-chiti CANNOT debate me. He's my *****.
`

 

[rylah]

Repeated posting of Hasbara edited wiki nonsense does not make your falsehoods any truer. I think we all know who is embarassing himself.
Even the Jewish Virtual Library, known for propagating Zionist propaganda, claims that there were only 5,000 Jews (1.7% of the population) in Palestine in the 16th century. Grow up you silly little twit.
Jewish & Non-Jewish Population of Israel/Palestine (1517-Present)

You Lying Taqiyyah Fraud.
There's NO Numbers between 1517 and 1882!
You DISHONEST stink bomb, it doesn't even touch the meat I posted: 1550-1660.

And BTW Akhmed, YOU are using a reliable Jewish source, aka, "Hasbara."
:^)
AS I always say
Montel-chiti CANNOT debate me. He's my *****.
`

You can look up the special occasions when monte used the "hasbara card' attacking a Palestinian lawyer, advisor to the PLO, who crushed his 'arguments' on the same issue...or being caught photoshoping documents, just to claim later he has "the only true source'.
Some delightful calls for genocide of all non-Christians in Israel and Palestine are there too- just look it up, he enjoys being reminded of that.

BTW did You know our monte has also proclaimed to being "a professor" -serious stuff!
Enjoy

 

[Challenger]

Everything "Israeli" comes from places and cultures foreign to Palestine, so what's your point?

How odd that the taqiyya'ist shuffles around "Pal'istanian" being colonists from Egypt, Syrian, Lebanon and earlier from Turkey, the Roman / European Crusader invasions and even the Mongol invasions.

You silly madrassah graduates are a hoot.

Good grief! Something from Hollie actualy worth a passing serious response, wonders will never cease!

Perhaps Hollie can provide evidence to corroborate that Mongols actually settled in Palestine after their defeat at Ain Jalut? Or that there was any mass migration of Christian Europeans during the Crudades period, given the Crusader States were always short of manpower and most if not all left when the states were finally conquered? The Romans indeed, ruled the area so there must be records of mass Roman settlement Hollie can cite, as opposed to just military garrisons and administrative elites, all of whom left after the Arab Conquest in any event. Oh yes, the Turks; Ottoman administration of their empire, like those empires that preceeded it relied on installing a thin veneer of administration, along with whatever military force that was required to keep order and defend the territory from external threats, they relied on indigenous populations to govern ithemselves through their own elites who were co-opted into the "government" in some form or other.

Oh my. Muhammud has been scouring wiki again for his history lessons. I note with amusement that Mo's taqiyya has failed him again. Even Mo's wiki version of history delineates the geographic area of his invented "country of Pal'istan" as an area that cultural, has been churned by various invasions, settlers and colonists.

As expected, little Mo' can't cite a single source for "Pal'istanian" as a unique culture, community or nation-state. There never was.

...and straight back to the vacuous and insubstantial hate filled drivel Hollie is famous for posting, hey-ho. Clearly she has nothing of substance to contribute. Next.

And here you are, as usual, unable to substantiate your baseless claims so you're left to childish tantrums.

Time out for, Mo'. Off to your room. Scoot.

Probably best you do the same since you are incapable of forming a coherent argument (or post for that matter) that contributes to the discussion in any meaningful way. Just another deluge of hollow Hasbara from Hollie, along with her projection of her own failings on to others, nothing to see here, moving on.