What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

ILOVEISRAEL

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
846
Points
160
If you want to make peace with Israel, you do not tell your people every now and then that the Western Wall has no religious significance to Jews and is, in fact, holy Muslim property.

Just ONE small example. Please tell us why it's in Israel's interest to eventually be a minority with no access to their religious sites



Please tell us why the Palestinians rioted
 
Last edited:
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
64,197
Reaction score
3,061
Points
1,815

Fighting Islamophobia and Education Apartheid: Lamis Deek and Fahd Ahmed & Chicago Teachers​


 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
64,197
Reaction score
3,061
Points
1,815

Palestine Deep Dive Live – Gaza: Open-Air Prison?​


 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
64,197
Reaction score
3,061
Points
1,815

Pro-Palestinian support growing, but will it lead to policy change? | The Stream​


 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
64,197
Reaction score
3,061
Points
1,815

How I Became an anti-Zionist Jew​


 

ILOVEISRAEL

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
5,222
Reaction score
846
Points
160
I couldn’t stop laughing. The Palestinians complained because they concerned they wouldn’t have access to THEIR Holy Sites????
However you see NOTHING wrong with Jews not having access. When two or more parties make a “ partnership, treaty,etc.etc. It’s understood that BOTH parties have to get some benefit from it
Please tell us why Israel would deliberately put themselves in a worse position then they were in 1967. There will not be a response
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
64,197
Reaction score
3,061
Points
1,815

Breaking the Israel-Palestine Status Quo with Zaha Hassan & Daniel Levy​


 

rylah

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
15,487
Reaction score
3,126
Points
290
I couldn’t stop laughing. The Palestinians complained because they concerned they wouldn’t have access to THEIR Holy Sites????
However you see NOTHING wrong with Jews not having access. When two or more parties make a “ partnership, treaty,etc.etc. It’s understood that BOTH parties have to get some benefit from it
Please tell us why Israel would deliberately put themselves in a worse position then they were in 1967. There will not be a response

If he's afraid of discussion,
let's see if we can further agree.

These accusations continue anyway,
what say, at least leverage them in Israel's favor.
It is possible to construct an altar in less than an hour...what then?
 
Last edited:

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
11,144
Reaction score
3,098
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Intensity, Level, and Duration of Violence
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: If anything, this is not born out by the facts. The aftermath of the Israeli unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip demonstrates that any attempt by the Israelis to set the conditions for a peaceful solution will not be reciprocated by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP).

Not true. Israeli violence continues ceasefire or not.
(COMMENT)
Since the inception of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)ª
(and the various developing factions) → the Intensity, Level, and Duration of Violent activities on the part of the HoAP has, if anything, expanded in the level of effort or extended the duration of the conflict.
EXCERPT • [/FONT]Report prepared and edited by Tristan Ferraro Legal adviser said:
"A test based solely on the functions of government exerted by the foreign forces should be rejected insofar as it was premised on a misinterpretation of Article 6§3 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. In fact, Article 42 of the Hague Regulations and Article 6§3 of the Fourth Geneva Convention were two distinct provisions pertaining to different specific materia. In any case, Article 6§3 of the Fourth Geneva Convention was not intended to provide a criterion for assessing the beginning and end of occupation, but only to regulate the end or the extent of the Convention’s applicability on the basis that occupation would still continue. In this respect, it was asserted that one should not substitute a test based solely on the exercise of governmental functions for the test derived from Article 42 of the Hague Regulations,"
SOURCE: Occupation and Other Forms of Administration of Foreign TerritoryInternational Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
No matter how you interpret the History of the conflict, the various factions of the post-PLO HoAP have NOT supported a peaceful period ("In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present Convention shall cease one year after the general close of military operations"). There has not been a one-year period of peace supported by the HoAP. In fact, NO Palestinian FACTION has a policy that contradicts the PLO position that "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." In fact, the current policy of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) openly adopts the political position that: "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals, and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."

The Israelis have taken extraordinary steps to prevent the unnecessary loss of uninvolved civilian casualties when responding to actual threats or use of force against the defense of the Israeli citizenry, Israeli territorial integrity, Israeli sovereignty, and the protection against HoAP activity which is solely intended to harm the Israeli Civil Administration of territory on the west side of the international boundary between Jordan and Israel. Having said that, the HoAP is operating at the opposite end of the spectrum. The HoAP has taken unprecedented measures to locate anti-Israeli strike activities and indirect fire launch sites within or close proximity of densely populated areas.

There is a large segment of the Arab Palestinian population that operates as if they are being denied some perceived notion relative to the "Right of Return" (RoR). While they may think there is some binding law or convention that has the power of international law, when asked to provide the citation for the same, they CAN NOT produce it.
₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪
ª The Basic Law of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was issued in the first Palestinian conference which was held in Jerusalem between 28 May → June 1964.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
64,197
Reaction score
3,061
Points
1,815
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Intensity, Level, and Duration of Violence
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: If anything, this is not born out by the facts. The aftermath of the Israeli unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip demonstrates that any attempt by the Israelis to set the conditions for a peaceful solution will not be reciprocated by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP).

(COMMENT)
Since the inception of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)ª
(and the various developing factions) → the Intensity, Level, and Duration of Violent activities on the part of the HoAP has, if anything, expanded in the level of effort or extended the duration of the conflict.

No matter how you interpret the History of the conflict, the various factions of the post-PLO HoAP have NOT supported a peaceful period (
"In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present Convention shall cease one year after the general close of military operations"). There has not been a one-year period of peace supported by the HoAP. In fact, NO Palestinian FACTION has a policy that contradicts the PLO position that "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine." In fact, the current policy of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) openly adopts the political position that: "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals, and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."

The Israelis have taken extraordinary steps to prevent the unnecessary loss of uninvolved civilian casualties when responding to actual threats or use of force against the defense of the Israeli citizenry, Israeli territorial integrity, Israeli sovereignty, and the protection against HoAP activity which is solely intended to harm the Israeli Civil Administration of territory on the west side of the international boundary between Jordan and Israel. Having said that, the HoAP is operating at the opposite end of the spectrum. The HoAP has taken unprecedented measures to locate anti-Israeli strike activities and indirect fire launch sites within or close proximity of densely populated areas.

There is a large segment of the Arab Palestinian population that operates as if they are being denied some perceived notion relative to the "Right of Return" (RoR). While they may think there is some binding law or convention that has the power of international law, when asked to provide the citation for the same, they CAN NOT produce it.
₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪₪
ª The Basic Law of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was issued in the first Palestinian conference which was held in Jerusalem between 28 May → June 1964.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
All of that blabber does not change the fact that all of the Palestinian's actions are a response to Israeli aggression.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top