I Will Have to Give Up on the Democratic Party after a Lifetime of Supporting them

LoveKimWexler

Active Member
Joined
May 2, 2026
Messages
140
Reaction score
111
Points
43
It is mainly because of the party's near complete abandonment of the working class combined with whose causes it has taken up instead. Los Angeles Times has a decent article about the working class, but that article was not the tipping point for me.

The Times does not ask the question of how the Democrats can win back the working class, but rather reports that there is a "cottage industry" based on asking that question. According to them:

The answers come in different forms. Sometimes it is veteran Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders — barnstorming red districts, railing against oligarchy and corporate greed.

Or it’s Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, who after the 2024 election declared, “Democrats must reclaim our identity as the party of the working class.”

Or the answer comes from a new generation of candidates — tattooed veterans, mechanics, bartenders — whose biography is supposed to do the political work that policy has not.

Graham Platner, the Maine Senate candidate who has become the left’s latest blue-collar savior, put the theory in its most unguarded form.

“We are in a form of class war,” he says. “And if the Democratic Party is going to have a future with working people, it needs to pick the side of working people.”

How does he define the working class? “Essentially everybody who isn’t making all their money on an immense amount of wealth.”


That is not the definition of working class. Many people have need to "make their money" through government benefits. But such a lifestyle does not make them part of the working class, just because they do not have large stock portfolios. To state what should be blindingly obvious, being in the working class requires working.

Tattoos do not impress me; they are long since not a badge of the working class. Nor does a former job that required manual labor. Many Congressmen and billionaires brag that they started out at McDonalds or other entry-level job. But as teenagers saving for a car by working after school, they had little in common with a parent trying to raise a family on minimum wage that barely covers daycare costs.

I don't care if your dad was Richie Rich or Caspar, I care about the policies you enact when you're in power that benefit the American worker. That's how you reclaim that identity, not just by announcing that you want to reclaim it.
 
I do not believe any party is worth following. The republicans seem able to screw up good ideas without a clue. But the democrats are the crazy half brother of the republicans. They claim that blacks and women are too stupid or lazy to work the internet or get an ID. They pretend that they never fought a war to keep slaves nor whole heartedly believed in segregation. They pretend they never tried to torpedo the civil rights act. They talk about reparations but give giant amounts of money to illegals. They spend money on projects that never seem to go anywhere or fix anything but somehow always seems to end up in someone’s pocket.
Neither party has put up a decent candidate in so long I have almost forgotten what a good presidential candidate looks like
 
It is mainly because of the party's near complete abandonment of the working class combined with whose causes it has taken up instead. Los Angeles Times has a decent article about the working class, but that article was not the tipping point for me.

The Times does not ask the question of how the Democrats can win back the working class, but rather reports that there is a "cottage industry" based on asking that question. According to them:

The answers come in different forms. Sometimes it is veteran Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders — barnstorming red districts, railing against oligarchy and corporate greed.

Or it’s Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, who after the 2024 election declared, “Democrats must reclaim our identity as the party of the working class.”

Or the answer comes from a new generation of candidates — tattooed veterans, mechanics, bartenders — whose biography is supposed to do the political work that policy has not.

Graham Platner, the Maine Senate candidate who has become the left’s latest blue-collar savior, put the theory in its most unguarded form.

“We are in a form of class war,” he says. “And if the Democratic Party is going to have a future with working people, it needs to pick the side of working people.”

How does he define the working class? “Essentially everybody who isn’t making all their money on an immense amount of wealth.”


That is not the definition of working class. Many people have need to "make their money" through government benefits. But such a lifestyle does not make them part of the working class, just because they do not have large stock portfolios. To state what should be blindingly obvious, being in the working class requires working.

Tattoos do not impress me; they are long since not a badge of the working class. Nor does a former job that required manual labor. Many Congressmen and billionaires brag that they started out at McDonalds or other entry-level job. But as teenagers saving for a car by working after school, they had little in common with a parent trying to raise a family on minimum wage that barely covers daycare costs.

I don't care if your dad was Richie Rich or Caspar, I care about the policies you enact when you're in power that benefit the American worker. That's how you reclaim that identity, not just by announcing that you want to reclaim it.
You're giving up on the Dems for similar reasons that I gave up on the Repubs.

Americans are on their own. When we cast a vote for any human being -- we cast a vote for a control freak or a narcissist or a con artist or for someone running for office based purely on self-interest.

Almost the entire political system is corrupt -- no matter which side of the aisle is in charge. I don't believe it will be fixed any time soon.
 
I voted for a dem once....once, and I won't make that mistake again.

I voted for Mark Warner (D-VA) for Senate because he was a good Blue Dog dem governor for Virginia and worked with the gop majority we had at the time to get stuff done.

He gets to the US Senate and BOOM, he votes lock step with even the craziest of the dems.

I learned my lesson.
 
I voted for a dem once....once, and I won't make that mistake again.

I voted for Mark Warner (D-VA) for Senate because he was a good Blue Dog dem governor for Virginia and worked with the gop majority we had at the time to get stuff done.

He gets to the US Senate and BOOM, he votes lock step with even the craziest of the dems.

I learned my lesson.
Same here. I voted for Warner because he was a moderate, but now he’s as radical left as the worst of them.
 
I voted for a dem once....once, and I won't make that mistake again.

I voted for Mark Warner (D-VA) for Senate because he was a good Blue Dog dem governor for Virginia and worked with the gop majority we had at the time to get stuff done.

He gets to the US Senate and BOOM, he votes lock step with even the craziest of the dems.

I learned my lesson.
Gained that extra step, and showed who he truly was eh ?
 
Same here. I voted for Warner because he was a moderate, but now he’s as radical left as the worst of them.
There are no moderate Democrats any longer. They have all been relegated to the ashcan of history.
 
Back
Top Bottom