"Palestinian" Arabs Demand Their Welfare Payments

[Hollie]

Land ownership of Palestine by large Jewish Corporations (in square kilometres) on 31 December 1945:

JNF 660.10
PICA 193.70
Palestine Land Development Co. Ltd. 9.70
Hemnuta Ltd 16.50
Africa Palestine Investment Co. Ltd. 9.90
Bayside Land Corporation Ltd. 8.50
Palestine Kupat Am. Bank Ltd. 8.40
Total 906.80

JNF= Jewish National Fund
PICA= Palestine Israeli Colonization Association

From the 1880s to the 1930s, most Jewish land purchases were made in the coastal plain, the Jezreel Valley, the Jordan Valley and to a lesser extent the Galilee.This was due to a preference for land that was cheap and without tenants.
There were two main reasons why these areas were sparsely populated. The first reason being when the Ottoman power in the rural areas began to diminish in the seventeenth century, many people moved to more centralized areas to secure protection against the lawless Bedouin tribes.
The second reason for the sparsely populated areas of the coastal plains was the soil type. The soil, covered in a layer of sand, made it impossible to grow the staple crop of Palestine, corn.As a result this area remained uncultivated and under populated." The sparse Arab population in the areas where the Jews usually bought their land enabled the Jews to carry out their purchase without engendering a massive displacement and eviction of Arab tenants".

In the 1930s most land was bought from small landowners. Of the land that the Jews bought, "52.6% of the lands were bought from big non-Palestinian landowners, 24.6% from Palestinian-Arab landowners and only 9.4% from the Fellahin.

This is simply not true.

According to the UN...

During the period of the Mandate, the Zionist Organization worked to secure the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. The indigenous people of Palestine, whose forefathers had inhabited the land for virtually the two preceding millennia felt this design to be a violation of their natural and inalienable rights.
​

And at the time they were discussing the Balfour Declaration...

One of Weizmann's concerns was over a "safeguard" clause concerning the interests of the Palestinian people. Its wording is remarkable, particularly when the careful drafting of the Declaration's language is recalled. This clause does not mention the Palestinian or Arab people, whether Christian or Muslim, who compromised over 90 per cent of the population of Palestine, and who owned about 97 per cent of its land.​

Here is the UN, in 1919, admitting Arabs owned 90% of the land in Palestine.

Want more? Okay....

Here is a country with 580,000 Arabs and 30,000 or is it 60,000 Jews (by no means all Zionists). - Lord Curzon
​

You people are ridiculous in the lies you tell.

Arab squatters have no "natural and inalienable rights" to land they squatted on.

 

[Phoenall]

Land ownership of Palestine by large Jewish Corporations (in square kilometres) on 31 December 1945:

JNF 660.10
PICA 193.70
Palestine Land Development Co. Ltd. 9.70
Hemnuta Ltd 16.50
Africa Palestine Investment Co. Ltd. 9.90
Bayside Land Corporation Ltd. 8.50
Palestine Kupat Am. Bank Ltd. 8.40
Total 906.80

JNF= Jewish National Fund
PICA= Palestine Israeli Colonization Association

From the 1880s to the 1930s, most Jewish land purchases were made in the coastal plain, the Jezreel Valley, the Jordan Valley and to a lesser extent the Galilee.This was due to a preference for land that was cheap and without tenants.
There were two main reasons why these areas were sparsely populated. The first reason being when the Ottoman power in the rural areas began to diminish in the seventeenth century, many people moved to more centralized areas to secure protection against the lawless Bedouin tribes.
The second reason for the sparsely populated areas of the coastal plains was the soil type. The soil, covered in a layer of sand, made it impossible to grow the staple crop of Palestine, corn.As a result this area remained uncultivated and under populated." The sparse Arab population in the areas where the Jews usually bought their land enabled the Jews to carry out their purchase without engendering a massive displacement and eviction of Arab tenants".

In the 1930s most land was bought from small landowners. Of the land that the Jews bought, "52.6% of the lands were bought from big non-Palestinian landowners, 24.6% from Palestinian-Arab landowners and only 9.4% from the Fellahin.

This is simply not true.

According to the UN...

During the period of the Mandate, the Zionist Organization worked to secure the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. The indigenous people of Palestine, whose forefathers had inhabited the land for virtually the two preceding millennia felt this design to be a violation of their natural and inalienable rights.
​

And at the time they were discussing the Balfour Declaration...

One of Weizmann's concerns was over a "safeguard" clause concerning the interests of the Palestinian people. Its wording is remarkable, particularly when the careful drafting of the Declaration's language is recalled. This clause does not mention the Palestinian or Arab people, whether Christian or Muslim, who compromised over 90 per cent of the population of Palestine, and who owned about 97 per cent of its land.​

Here is the UN, in 1919, admitting Arabs owned 90% of the land in Palestine.

Want more? Okay....

Here is a country with 580,000 Arabs and 30,000 or is it 60,000 Jews (by no means all Zionists). - Lord Curzon
​

You people are ridiculous in the lies you tell.

Just islamonazi propaganda as it was written by Palestinians of the DPR. Your link clearly state it is of Palestinian origin


Sourceivision for Palestinian Rights (DPR)
30 June 1978


Now how could the UN admit in 1919 that arabs owned 90% of the land when 1) it was not even in existence and 2) the report was not a sanction report.

So you fail again because you don't research your links before blindly posting them as undisputed fact.



And I cant see where your post proves that the arabs owned 97% of the land when it was owned 100% by non arab muslims in the 1890's

 

[Phoenall]

The map was never evidence and would be thrown out of any court as being hearsay

Maybe your kangaroo court.

No any American court as it is inadmissible evidence

 

[Phoenall]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

 

[Phoenall]

Notice the copyright symbol

Graphicmaps can make any map you give them to your specifications. At least with the UN, you know they did some due diligence to see that the map was accurate.

Then where is the UN stamp of approval on this map ?

 

[Phoenall]

Land ownership of Palestine by large Jewish Corporations (in square kilometres) on 31 December 1945:

JNF 660.10
PICA 193.70
Palestine Land Development Co. Ltd. 9.70
Hemnuta Ltd 16.50
Africa Palestine Investment Co. Ltd. 9.90
Bayside Land Corporation Ltd. 8.50
Palestine Kupat Am. Bank Ltd. 8.40
Total 906.80

JNF= Jewish National Fund
PICA= Palestine Israeli Colonization Association

From the 1880s to the 1930s, most Jewish land purchases were made in the coastal plain, the Jezreel Valley, the Jordan Valley and to a lesser extent the Galilee.This was due to a preference for land that was cheap and without tenants.
There were two main reasons why these areas were sparsely populated. The first reason being when the Ottoman power in the rural areas began to diminish in the seventeenth century, many people moved to more centralized areas to secure protection against the lawless Bedouin tribes.
The second reason for the sparsely populated areas of the coastal plains was the soil type. The soil, covered in a layer of sand, made it impossible to grow the staple crop of Palestine, corn.As a result this area remained uncultivated and under populated." The sparse Arab population in the areas where the Jews usually bought their land enabled the Jews to carry out their purchase without engendering a massive displacement and eviction of Arab tenants".

In the 1930s most land was bought from small landowners. Of the land that the Jews bought, "52.6% of the lands were bought from big non-Palestinian landowners, 24.6% from Palestinian-Arab landowners and only 9.4% from the Fellahin.

This is simply not true.

According to the UN...

During the period of the Mandate, the Zionist Organization worked to secure the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. The indigenous people of Palestine, whose forefathers had inhabited the land for virtually the two preceding millennia felt this design to be a violation of their natural and inalienable rights.
​

And at the time they were discussing the Balfour Declaration...

One of Weizmann's concerns was over a "safeguard" clause concerning the interests of the Palestinian people. Its wording is remarkable, particularly when the careful drafting of the Declaration's language is recalled. This clause does not mention the Palestinian or Arab people, whether Christian or Muslim, who compromised over 90 per cent of the population of Palestine, and who owned about 97 per cent of its land.​

Here is the UN, in 1919, admitting Arabs owned 90% of the land in Palestine.

Want more? Okay....

Here is a country with 580,000 Arabs and 30,000 or is it 60,000 Jews (by no means all Zionists). - Lord Curzon
​

You people are ridiculous in the lies you tell.

Not according to two Ottoman census' and one British census

 

[Humanity]

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

 

[Hollie]

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the map is our of date.

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

Notice the map is out of date.

 

[Phoenall]

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

 

[Humanity]

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

And, aside from that you are happy with this map? It's "official" because of the copyright symbol? Right?

 

[Phoenall]

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

And, aside from that you are happy with this map? It's "official" because of the copyright symbol? Right?

The point was made that the committee map does not have any stamp of approval and I posted a map that was more valid. Do you see the map from the committee that does not appear in any UN resolution as being valid, or as I see it a fake with no grounding in reality. As this document shows

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

 

[Humanity]

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

And, aside from that you are happy with this map? It's "official" because of the copyright symbol? Right?

The point was made that the committee map does not have any stamp of approval and I posted a map that was more valid. Do you see the map from the committee that does not appear in any UN resolution as being valid, or as I see it a fake with no grounding in reality. As this document shows

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

So you are happy with the validity of my map also, based upon your "copyright symbol" logic...?

 

[Billo_Really]

The point was made that the committee map does not have any stamp of approval and I posted a map that was more valid. Do you see the map from the committee that does not appear in any UN resolution as being valid, or as I see it a fake with no grounding in reality. As this document shows

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

Hey shithead,

I didn't see no map at your first link. And at your second, I got this...





BTW, here's the link to my map...

...which you can obviously see, is an official UN website.

 

[Phoenall]

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

And, aside from that you are happy with this map? It's "official" because of the copyright symbol? Right?

The point was made that the committee map does not have any stamp of approval and I posted a map that was more valid. Do you see the map from the committee that does not appear in any UN resolution as being valid, or as I see it a fake with no grounding in reality. As this document shows

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

So you are happy with the validity of my map also, based upon your "copyright symbol" logic...?

I am happy with this that proves the map wrong

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

 

[Humanity]

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

Does it?

Looks to me like it shows Jerusalem being part of Palestine and West Bank... Israel is WHERE on this map exactly?

 

[Phoenall]

The point was made that the committee map does not have any stamp of approval and I posted a map that was more valid. Do you see the map from the committee that does not appear in any UN resolution as being valid, or as I see it a fake with no grounding in reality. As this document shows

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

Hey shithead,

I didn't see no map at your first link. And at your second, I got this...





BTW, here's the link to my map...

...which you can obviously see, is an official UN website.

Being an official UN site does not make it an official UN map, what does it apply to and in what context. How does it differ from preceding UN reports that show it to be wrong. Who was the authority that produced the map and why is there no source in the link to the UN site. Once again you fail to do your research and rely on just the details that support your anti Jew claims. Care to comment on this that shows your false map to be wrong and give's the legal population figures


CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

 

[Phoenall]

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

Does it?

Looks to me like it shows Jerusalem being part of Palestine and West Bank... Israel is WHERE on this map exactly?

Look again and you can see the borders of the west bank and Jerusalem is not inside them. Never was and never will be, and it is time for the UN to implement their own international laws and decide the issue legally

 

[Humanity]

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

More official that one drawn by committee on the words of another committee

Notice the copyright symbol...

View attachment 48162

And it shows that Jerusalem is part of Israel doesn't it so you wont be making the false claims anymore

Does it?

Looks to me like it shows Jerusalem being part of Palestine and West Bank... Israel is WHERE on this map exactly?

Look again and you can see the borders of the west bank and Jerusalem is not inside them. Never was and never will be, and it is time for the UN to implement their own international laws and decide the issue legally

Look again Phoney...

The MAJORITY of Jerusalem is inside the border of the West Bank!

And...

Where is Israel indicated exactly on this map?

I cannot see the mention of the name Israel anywhere!!!

Yet, it must be an "official" map, according to your logic at least, as there is a "copyright symbol" located on the bottom of the map...

 

[Billo_Really]

The point was made that the committee map does not have any stamp of approval and I posted a map that was more valid. Do you see the map from the committee that does not appear in any UN resolution as being valid, or as I see it a fake with no grounding in reality. As this document shows

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

Hey shithead,

I didn't see no map at your first link. And at your second, I got this...





BTW, here's the link to my map...

...which you can obviously see, is an official UN website.

Being an official UN site does not make it an official UN map, what does it apply to and in what context. How does it differ from preceding UN reports that show it to be wrong. Who was the authority that produced the map and why is there no source in the link to the UN site. Once again you fail to do your research and rely on just the details that support your anti Jew claims. Care to comment on this that shows your false map to be wrong and give's the legal population figures


CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000; Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

Read the ******* map! It's pretty self explanatory.

Look troll, you and I both know you're just making this up as you go along.

 

[Billo_Really]

Arab squatters have no "natural and inalienable rights" to land they squatted on.

They have more rights than your Jewish insurgents.