"Palestinian" Arabs Demand Their Welfare Payments

[Hollie]

"Provide the evidence that it isn't"

You made a bogus claim, unsupported, and then suggest that anyone is required to disprove a claim you're too incompetent to make a positive case for?

You're so silly.

I made a claim and the map was my evidence.

All you're doing is talking shit.

You made a feeble attempt at a claim that you're unable to support.

No one is required to take that seriously.

 

[Humanity]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

 

[Hollie]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Land ownership of Palestine by large Jewish Corporations (in square kilometres) on 31 December 1945:

JNF 660.10
PICA 193.70
Palestine Land Development Co. Ltd. 9.70
Hemnuta Ltd 16.50
Africa Palestine Investment Co. Ltd. 9.90
Bayside Land Corporation Ltd. 8.50
Palestine Kupat Am. Bank Ltd. 8.40
Total 906.80

JNF= Jewish National Fund
PICA= Palestine Israeli Colonization Association

From the 1880s to the 1930s, most Jewish land purchases were made in the coastal plain, the Jezreel Valley, the Jordan Valley and to a lesser extent the Galilee.This was due to a preference for land that was cheap and without tenants.
There were two main reasons why these areas were sparsely populated. The first reason being when the Ottoman power in the rural areas began to diminish in the seventeenth century, many people moved to more centralized areas to secure protection against the lawless Bedouin tribes.
The second reason for the sparsely populated areas of the coastal plains was the soil type. The soil, covered in a layer of sand, made it impossible to grow the staple crop of Palestine, corn.As a result this area remained uncultivated and under populated." The sparse Arab population in the areas where the Jews usually bought their land enabled the Jews to carry out their purchase without engendering a massive displacement and eviction of Arab tenants".

In the 1930s most land was bought from small landowners. Of the land that the Jews bought, "52.6% of the lands were bought from big non-Palestinian landowners, 24.6% from Palestinian-Arab landowners and only 9.4% from the Fellahin.

 

[Humanity]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

 

[Hollie]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

No need to get your Islamo-hurt feelings in a bunch. There are lots of maps to be found on the web.

You're the one insisting that someone else's posting of an unsourced copy and paste somehow makes that map an "official" map.

You're "officially" naive and gullible. Look at the map, it says so.

 

[Humanity]

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

No need to get your Islamo-hurt feelings in a bunch. There are lots of maps to be found on the web.

You're the one insisting that someone else's posting of an unsourced copy and paste somehow makes that map an "official" map.

You're "officially" naive and gullible. Look at the map, it says so.

Oh dear, the zionut has comprehension issues...

I made no claim that the map was "official", simply quoted your text...

And, you still cannot provide a map, official or otherwise...

 

[Hollie]

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

No need to get your Islamo-hurt feelings in a bunch. There are lots of maps to be found on the web.

You're the one insisting that someone else's posting of an unsourced copy and paste somehow makes that map an "official" map.

You're "officially" naive and gullible. Look at the map, it says so.

Oh dear, the zionut has comprehension issues...

I made no claim that the map was "official", simply quoted your text...

And, you still cannot provide a map, official or otherwise...

Of course you made a comment about the map being "official".

Your specific comment was "Have you got a better official land map".

You still can't provide a reason why anyone should accept the map as "official" anything.

You can believe the map is "official", that's fine. You can also find "official" maps leading to sales agreements for the Brooklyn Bridge. Remember, you read it on the Internet so it must be true.

 

[Humanity]

Have you got a better "official land map"?

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

No need to get your Islamo-hurt feelings in a bunch. There are lots of maps to be found on the web.

You're the one insisting that someone else's posting of an unsourced copy and paste somehow makes that map an "official" map.

You're "officially" naive and gullible. Look at the map, it says so.

Oh dear, the zionut has comprehension issues...

I made no claim that the map was "official", simply quoted your text...

And, you still cannot provide a map, official or otherwise...

Of course you made a comment about the map being "official".

Your specific comment was "Have you got a better official land map".

You still can't provide a reason why anyone should accept the map as "official" anything.

You can believe the map is "official", that's fine. You can also find "official" maps leading to sales agreements for the Brooklyn Bridge. Remember, you read it on the Internet so it must be true.

Simply quoting what you said, do you remember... "Who made that the "official land map"?"

I posted - Have you got a better "official land map"?

So, let me ask you again, in slightly easier English for you...

Have you got a better map, official or otherwise?

No?

Then you have nothing to say!

 

[Hollie]

What is "official" about the "official" map other than its self-entitled "official'ness"?

"It's true because I read it on the Internet" is a poor excuse for being gullible.

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

No need to get your Islamo-hurt feelings in a bunch. There are lots of maps to be found on the web.

You're the one insisting that someone else's posting of an unsourced copy and paste somehow makes that map an "official" map.

You're "officially" naive and gullible. Look at the map, it says so.

Oh dear, the zionut has comprehension issues...

I made no claim that the map was "official", simply quoted your text...

And, you still cannot provide a map, official or otherwise...

Of course you made a comment about the map being "official".

Your specific comment was "Have you got a better official land map".

You still can't provide a reason why anyone should accept the map as "official" anything.

You can believe the map is "official", that's fine. You can also find "official" maps leading to sales agreements for the Brooklyn Bridge. Remember, you read it on the Internet so it must be true.

Simply quoting what you said, do you remember... "Who made that the "official land map"?"

I posted - Have you got a better "official land map"?

So, let me ask you again, in slightly easier English for you...

Have you got a better map, official or otherwise?

No?

Then you have nothing to say!

I'm only trying to get you to explain why you're worshipping at the altar of a cut and paste map of unknown origin.

Why is it that you're so enamored with a map labeled "official" when there's no reason to accept the "official" title as having anything "official" about it.

Your vacant minded acceptance of "I read it on the Internet so it must be true" is gullible and naive. Why would you think others should accept such gullibility?

 

[Humanity]

So you don't have a better map...

Figures...

Failing to support any of your words is a poor excuse for being an idiot!

No need to get your Islamo-hurt feelings in a bunch. There are lots of maps to be found on the web.

You're the one insisting that someone else's posting of an unsourced copy and paste somehow makes that map an "official" map.

You're "officially" naive and gullible. Look at the map, it says so.

Oh dear, the zionut has comprehension issues...

I made no claim that the map was "official", simply quoted your text...

And, you still cannot provide a map, official or otherwise...

Of course you made a comment about the map being "official".

Your specific comment was "Have you got a better official land map".

You still can't provide a reason why anyone should accept the map as "official" anything.

You can believe the map is "official", that's fine. You can also find "official" maps leading to sales agreements for the Brooklyn Bridge. Remember, you read it on the Internet so it must be true.

Simply quoting what you said, do you remember... "Who made that the "official land map"?"

I posted - Have you got a better "official land map"?

So, let me ask you again, in slightly easier English for you...

Have you got a better map, official or otherwise?

No?

Then you have nothing to say!

I'm only trying to get you to explain why you're worshipping at the altar of a cut and paste map of unknown origin.

Why is it that you're so enamored with a map labeled "official" when there's no reason to accept the "official" title as having anything "official" about it.

Your vacant minded acceptance of "I read it on the Internet so it must be true" is gullible and naive. Why would you think others should accept such gullibility?

Another zionut who likes the sound of their own words...

 

[Coyote]

Guys - get back on topic and take the crap to the Flame Zone.

 

[Phoenall]

I read the bottom of it.

Read my question again: who made the "official land map"? Since when is the UN a land title company?

Stupidity is not an excuse you can fall back on forever.

It's an official UN document. If you don't think its true, pony up the evidence that shows its not.

Where does it say that then, where is the UN stamp of approval making it official ?

 

[Phoenall]

Read the top and see it was "sub committee 2 of the ad hoc committee on the Palestine question" so not a legal document and riddled with mistakes. Like were is the Negev on this map

Show evidence that proves it wrong.

You just shooting your mouth off, doesn't mean anything.

I can show you lack of evidence, will that do

No official UN stamp on the map making it an in-house one, what UN resolution was it appended to ?

 

[Phoenall]

"Provide the evidence that it isn't"

You made a bogus claim, unsupported, and then suggest that anyone is required to disprove a claim you're too incompetent to make a positive case for?

You're so silly.

I made a claim and the map was my evidence.

All you're doing is talking shit.

The map was never evidence and would be thrown out of any court as being hearsay

 

[Phoenall]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

 

[Billo_Really]

Land ownership of Palestine by large Jewish Corporations (in square kilometres) on 31 December 1945:

JNF 660.10
PICA 193.70
Palestine Land Development Co. Ltd. 9.70
Hemnuta Ltd 16.50
Africa Palestine Investment Co. Ltd. 9.90
Bayside Land Corporation Ltd. 8.50
Palestine Kupat Am. Bank Ltd. 8.40
Total 906.80

JNF= Jewish National Fund
PICA= Palestine Israeli Colonization Association

From the 1880s to the 1930s, most Jewish land purchases were made in the coastal plain, the Jezreel Valley, the Jordan Valley and to a lesser extent the Galilee.This was due to a preference for land that was cheap and without tenants.
There were two main reasons why these areas were sparsely populated. The first reason being when the Ottoman power in the rural areas began to diminish in the seventeenth century, many people moved to more centralized areas to secure protection against the lawless Bedouin tribes.
The second reason for the sparsely populated areas of the coastal plains was the soil type. The soil, covered in a layer of sand, made it impossible to grow the staple crop of Palestine, corn.As a result this area remained uncultivated and under populated." The sparse Arab population in the areas where the Jews usually bought their land enabled the Jews to carry out their purchase without engendering a massive displacement and eviction of Arab tenants".

In the 1930s most land was bought from small landowners. Of the land that the Jews bought, "52.6% of the lands were bought from big non-Palestinian landowners, 24.6% from Palestinian-Arab landowners and only 9.4% from the Fellahin.

This is simply not true.

According to the UN...

During the period of the Mandate, the Zionist Organization worked to secure the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. The indigenous people of Palestine, whose forefathers had inhabited the land for virtually the two preceding millennia felt this design to be a violation of their natural and inalienable rights.
​

And at the time they were discussing the Balfour Declaration...

One of Weizmann's concerns was over a "safeguard" clause concerning the interests of the Palestinian people. Its wording is remarkable, particularly when the careful drafting of the Declaration's language is recalled. This clause does not mention the Palestinian or Arab people, whether Christian or Muslim, who compromised over 90 per cent of the population of Palestine, and who owned about 97 per cent of its land.​

Here is the UN, in 1919, admitting Arabs owned 90% of the land in Palestine.

Want more? Okay....

Here is a country with 580,000 Arabs and 30,000 or is it 60,000 Jews (by no means all Zionists). - Lord Curzon
​

You people are ridiculous in the lies you tell.

 

[Billo_Really]

The map was never evidence and would be thrown out of any court as being hearsay

Maybe your kangaroo court.

 

[Humanity]

What you have been lead to believe is bullshit.
You have got to get over this ridiculous idea that there was a thriving nation of Palestinians living there. There was not.
In the late 1800's, there wasn't a living soul there. By 1948, this is the breakdown of land ownership:
71.2 % of the land was owned by Britain.
8.6 % owned by Jews.
16.9 % owned by NON Resident Arabs.
3.3 % owned by RESIDENT Arabs.


APRIL 5, 1950
The Arab National Committee:
"THE REMOVAL OF THE ARAB INHABITANTS (who btw, had been living in Israel for less than 24 months) WAS VOLUNTARY AND WAS CARRIED OUT AT OUR REQUEST. THE ARAB DELEGATON PROUDLY ASKED FOR THE EVACUATION OF THE ARABS AND THEIR REMOVAL TO THE NEIGHBORING ARAB COUNTRIES."

Neighboring countries refused to let the Arabs into the neighboring countries. So the squatted on the outskirts of Israel.
ISRAEL OWES THEM NOTHING.

You're so full of shit. Here's the official land ownership in that area in 1948.

Who made that the "official land map"?

Have you got a better "official land map"?

Notice the copyright symbol

Copyright symbol noted...

And?

Does that make it "official"?

 

[Billo_Really]

Notice the copyright symbol

Graphicmaps can make any map you give them to your specifications. At least with the UN, you know they did some due diligence to see that the map was accurate.