Packing the Court

[postman]

There is an election coming up and the public is against packing the courts which Piglosi knows quite well. If they keep the House and Biden does get in, they won't care as much because the next election will be 2 years away. If they tried to pack the courts at this stage of the game, without a doubt they will lose leadership of the House in a big way.

Actually it would not be packing the courts, but restoring the court to it's proper number of justices.

There are 13 appellate courts that sit below the U.S. Supreme Court, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 94 federal judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a court of appeals.

Right now Justice Roberts and others are assigned multiple appellate courts to oversee. Previously each justice only oversaw one circuit.

So expanding the court to 13 justices would be fair and proper.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

How about because this issue came up 45 days before a election. The Garland nomination was before the primary fight was settled. Republicans set the benchmark.

Oh please, Garland aside, the Democrats would have jumped at the opportunity just as Republicans are today.

 

[buckeye45_73]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Republicans have no moral code. They are setting the tone for this. Republicans are the ones trying to pack the court. They want judges who will legislate from the bench. The ACA is the perfect example. It is perfectly constitutional now. The federal government has a right to regulate insurance companies just like the states do. Yet 4 so called conservatives don't agree with that.

Ok see you have no clue. Republicans don't want judges to make policy, that's legislating from the bench. The left has, that's the only way the left has pushed their agenda for 60 years. I think the ACA was the only thing they had congress pass in that time......and it cost them bigtime. Their policies are not liked, even with 95% of the media sunshine pumping them, Biden still won't say he's for them.....publicly.

And appointing justices is not packing the court.....you lefties like to change the definitions or terms and words.....so you have to either be stupid or lie. Noone said Obama was packing the court, or Clinton? or Bush? Because none of them or their parties ever suggested to pack the court....


so do you know what packing the court really means?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There is an election coming up and the public is against packing the courts which Piglosi knows quite well. If they keep the House and Biden does get in, they won't care as much because the next election will be 2 years away. If they tried to pack the courts at this stage of the game, without a doubt they will lose leadership of the House in a big way.

Actually it would not be packing the courts, but restoring the court to it's proper number of justices.

There are 13 appellate courts that sit below the U.S. Supreme Court, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 94 federal judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a court of appeals.

Right now Justice Roberts and others are assigned multiple appellate courts to oversee. Previously each justice only oversaw one circuit.

So expanding the court to 13 justices would be fair and proper.

It would? So if Trump wins reelection, you have no problem with him doing that?

 

[busybee01]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

trump - when he stopped interrupting and focused on just the facts, did fine. but he couldn't leave it alone there.

biden is just full of shit. trying to justify blocking this by voters having their say is wimpy ass crap that will get used by the right later when the eventual worm turns back to the democrats having this option.

No, but I don't think he should've, in fact he got Biden to be less Presidential than him......so to the Never Trumpers....Trump =has never been rude to say just Shut Up..........And Biden still wouldn't answer

why is the goal to make someone look worse than you?

strange goal, to me.

HAve you seen those two....it's a street fight.....Trump is not about being Presidential...it's why he mocks it when he has the chance.....it's a stupid idea that the rich elites can afford, because they have the power.....I voted for him to knock those people in the teeth.....so they use it against him in the wine and brie crowd. So he baited Joe into being worse in that category so people at the Lincoln Project, who say they oppose him on that grounds (they state they are conservative, I laugh, but that's what they say) now can't use that canard......it's just another way to expose the lies and hypocrisy. The thing is Trump was interrupting but he never lost his cool......I want a commander in chief that doesn't lose his cool under pressure, Biden did.

Biden did not lose his cool. He was right to tell Trump to shut up. Trump did not help himself as he changed no minds. Trump came across as a obnoxious bully. That is not what we want for a President. People are tired of the Trump reality show and he reminded them that last night.

 

[buckeye45_73]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

So why can't your nominee for President say so?

Because Democrats say you have to vote for them, before you know what they're for. This is a perfect example of why they need the court....people don't want their shit, so they don't discuss it in public and they have the courts pass it.......now they won't have the courts and they are panicking...they don't know how else to get their shit implemented

 

[postman]

Chief justice Roberts sits over three circuits.
For the District of Columbia Circuit
For the Fourth Circuit
For the Federal Circuit

Justice Sotomayor
For the Sixth Circuit
For the Tenth Circuit

Justice Alito
For the Third Circuit
For the Fifth Circuit

The rest cover only a single circuit.

To each his own, I say.

 

[postman]

There is an election coming up and the public is against packing the courts which Piglosi knows quite well. If they keep the House and Biden does get in, they won't care as much because the next election will be 2 years away. If they tried to pack the courts at this stage of the game, without a doubt they will lose leadership of the House in a big way.

Actually it would not be packing the courts, but restoring the court to it's proper number of justices.

There are 13 appellate courts that sit below the U.S. Supreme Court, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 94 federal judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a court of appeals.

Right now Justice Roberts and others are assigned multiple appellate courts to oversee. Previously each justice only oversaw one circuit.

So expanding the court to 13 justices would be fair and proper.

It would? So if Trump wins reelection, you have no problem with him doing that?

My opinion doesn't change with who sits in the oval office. Or who runs the senate.

 

[buckeye45_73]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

trump - when he stopped interrupting and focused on just the facts, did fine. but he couldn't leave it alone there.

biden is just full of shit. trying to justify blocking this by voters having their say is wimpy ass crap that will get used by the right later when the eventual worm turns back to the democrats having this option.

No, but I don't think he should've, in fact he got Biden to be less Presidential than him......so to the Never Trumpers....Trump =has never been rude to say just Shut Up..........And Biden still wouldn't answer

why is the goal to make someone look worse than you?

strange goal, to me.

HAve you seen those two....it's a street fight.....Trump is not about being Presidential...it's why he mocks it when he has the chance.....it's a stupid idea that the rich elites can afford, because they have the power.....I voted for him to knock those people in the teeth.....so they use it against him in the wine and brie crowd. So he baited Joe into being worse in that category so people at the Lincoln Project, who say they oppose him on that grounds (they state they are conservative, I laugh, but that's what they say) now can't use that canard......it's just another way to expose the lies and hypocrisy. The thing is Trump was interrupting but he never lost his cool......I want a commander in chief that doesn't lose his cool under pressure, Biden did.

Biden did not lose his cool. He was right to tell Trump to shut up. Trump did not help himself as he changed no minds. Trump came across as a obnoxious bully. That is not what we want for a President. People are tired of the Trump reality show and he reminded them that last night.

Yeah Biden did the same shit and Trump didn't say anything remotely that rude

 

[busybee01]

ight after Rump tried to Blackmail the Ukrainian President to try and dig up dirt on Biden and start a nonsense investigation which the Ukrainian Leader refused to do. Newsflash, skippy: That is damned serious and should have never been attempted. And it was proven by the House and again by the Mueller investigation. In a court of law, Rump would be spending hard time right now but his Co-Conspirators in the Senate let him walk. Until then, Pelosi was holding off any form of Impeachment on Rump.

Which is utter bull. First off there was no blackmail. You TDS people are so full of lies that it's embarrassing. The only person that actually blackmailed Ukraine was Biden. The only people that colluded with the Russians to interfere with the election was the DNC and Hillary Clinton.

The commies conducted the first impeachment in our history where there was no impeachable offense and no crimes committed. It's the first impeachment ever to be forwarded using Thought Police.

You are a idiot. Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. They used social media for pro-Trump ads. In 2020, intelligence agencies have reported on Russian attempts to put out false information to denigrate Biden. All you have to do is look at Ron Johnson's phony report.

 

[buckeye45_73]

ight after Rump tried to Blackmail the Ukrainian President to try and dig up dirt on Biden and start a nonsense investigation which the Ukrainian Leader refused to do. Newsflash, skippy: That is damned serious and should have never been attempted. And it was proven by the House and again by the Mueller investigation. In a court of law, Rump would be spending hard time right now but his Co-Conspirators in the Senate let him walk. Until then, Pelosi was holding off any form of Impeachment on Rump.

Which is utter bull. First off there was no blackmail. You TDS people are so full of lies that it's embarrassing. The only person that actually blackmailed Ukraine was Biden. The only people that colluded with the Russians to interfere with the election was the DNC and Hillary Clinton.

The commies conducted the first impeachment in our history where there was no impeachable offense and no crimes committed. It's the first impeachment ever to be forwarded using Thought Police.

You are a idiot. Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. They used social media for pro-Trump ads. In 2020, intelligence agencies have reported on Russian attempts to put out false information to denigrate Biden. All you have to do is look at Ron Johnson's phony report.

No they didn't, why did the DNC not allow the FBI to look at the hacked servers? Why did they FBI just let that go? The Russia hoax was just that a hoax. Trump had nothing to do with it and Hillary Clinton was all over it. She paid for the fake dossier to be made.

 

[postman]

How about because this issue came up 45 days before a election. The Garland nomination was before the primary fight was settled. Republicans set the benchmark.

Oh please, Garland aside, the Democrats would have jumped at the opportunity just as Republicans are today.

Lindsay Graham said to hold him to his word, that they should not confirm supreme court justices after the primaries start. That it should be left to the judgement of the people after the November elections.

I say we should hold all republicans to what they said in 2016, and not the new version for 2020/

 

[JoeMoma]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Pelosi already nixed that idea and right now, She is in charge of the House. No matter how hard you fruitcakes try and finger paint that picture, the House is NOT going to vote to pack the Court. And it HAS to originate in the House. I won't say that you don't have any morals but I do suggest you find a better moral compass.

If the dems sweep the presidency, the house and the senate, that could easily change. Also, who know's how long NP will remain as speaker? She is already 80 years old.

 

[buckeye45_73]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Pelosi already nixed that idea and right now, She is in charge of the House. No matter how hard you fruitcakes try and finger paint that picture, the House is NOT going to vote to pack the Court. And it HAS to originate in the House. I won't say that you don't have any morals but I do suggest you find a better moral compass.

If the dems sweep the presidency, the house and the senate, that could easily change. Also, who know's how long NP will remain as speaker? She is already 80 years old.

Did the freshmen dems make pledges to not support her, then when they got in office they said well only this one time....the dems are liars

Update: yes they did and they lied blatantly

Nancy Pelosi's freshmen critics go quiet as major speaker vote looms | CNN Politics

Elissa Slotkin was unambiguous as she campaigned for a House seat: Nancy Pelosi would not win her over.

www.cnn.com

 

[busybee01]

ight after Rump tried to Blackmail the Ukrainian President to try and dig up dirt on Biden and start a nonsense investigation which the Ukrainian Leader refused to do. Newsflash, skippy: That is damned serious and should have never been attempted. And it was proven by the House and again by the Mueller investigation. In a court of law, Rump would be spending hard time right now but his Co-Conspirators in the Senate let him walk. Until then, Pelosi was holding off any form of Impeachment on Rump.

Which is utter bull. First off there was no blackmail. You TDS people are so full of lies that it's embarrassing. The only person that actually blackmailed Ukraine was Biden. The only people that colluded with the Russians to interfere with the election was the DNC and Hillary Clinton.

The commies conducted the first impeachment in our history where there was no impeachable offense and no crimes committed. It's the first impeachment ever to be forwarded using Thought Police.

Trump was clearly pressuring Ukraine to open a phony investigation. Giuliani was pressuring Ukraine even before the phone call. In addition he was meeting with pro-Russia politicians in Ukraine who were feeding him misinformation. It was the Trump campaign who gave a business associate of Manafort with ties to Russian Intelligence internal polling data and other campaign information.

The impeachment was more than justified. Removal of Trump w2as justified as well. Trump was attempting to pressure Ukraine to open a phony investigation. That is conspiracy.

 

[busybee01]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Pelosi already nixed that idea and right now, She is in charge of the House. No matter how hard you fruitcakes try and finger paint that picture, the House is NOT going to vote to pack the Court. And it HAS to originate in the House. I won't say that you don't have any morals but I do suggest you find a better moral compass.

Pelosi also once said she would not impeach Trump, but later and conveniently changed her mind.

Make no mistake, the crazies run the DNC

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Pelosi already nixed that idea and right now, She is in charge of the House. No matter how hard you fruitcakes try and finger paint that picture, the House is NOT going to vote to pack the Court. And it HAS to originate in the House. I won't say that you don't have any morals but I do suggest you find a better moral compass.

Pelosi also once said she would not impeach Trump, but later and conveniently changed her mind.

Make no mistake, the crazies run the DNC

Then he pulled the Ukraine crap. It should have been cut and dried but for the Conspirators in the Senate. I doubt the next time Rump goes that far overboard they are going to protect him considering they just might be standing in front of a Justice themselves.

The "Ukraine crap" was Trump getting wind of Biden's son in the Ukraine making millions of dollars whom his daddy protected by telling the Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son or they lose their money. He is even on tape admitting it. So Joe was guilty of Quid pro Qoo, something they then accused Trump of.

But that is how the DNC roles, the always go on offense, never defense.

That is so much bullshit. There is absolutely no evidence of that. Joe Biden was relaying the Obama policy that no American aid would be forthcoming unless Ukraine fired a corrupt prosecutor. The investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time Biden went to Ukraine.

 

[buckeye45_73]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Pelosi already nixed that idea and right now, She is in charge of the House. No matter how hard you fruitcakes try and finger paint that picture, the House is NOT going to vote to pack the Court. And it HAS to originate in the House. I won't say that you don't have any morals but I do suggest you find a better moral compass.

Pelosi also once said she would not impeach Trump, but later and conveniently changed her mind.

Make no mistake, the crazies run the DNC

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

Not taught history, eh?

FDR thought he was king and tried to pack the courts. But you are right on one thing, Congress is needed to go along. During the reign of FDR, he had a democrat Congress who was appalled at the notion of packing the courts just to "get things done" because it is an open subversion of the Constitution, but today's radical democrats have no such moral code. In fact, they have no morals.

Pelosi already nixed that idea and right now, She is in charge of the House. No matter how hard you fruitcakes try and finger paint that picture, the House is NOT going to vote to pack the Court. And it HAS to originate in the House. I won't say that you don't have any morals but I do suggest you find a better moral compass.

Pelosi also once said she would not impeach Trump, but later and conveniently changed her mind.

Make no mistake, the crazies run the DNC

Then he pulled the Ukraine crap. It should have been cut and dried but for the Conspirators in the Senate. I doubt the next time Rump goes that far overboard they are going to protect him considering they just might be standing in front of a Justice themselves.

The "Ukraine crap" was Trump getting wind of Biden's son in the Ukraine making millions of dollars whom his daddy protected by telling the Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son or they lose their money. He is even on tape admitting it. So Joe was guilty of Quid pro Qoo, something they then accused Trump of.

But that is how the DNC roles, the always go on offense, never defense.

That is so much bullshit. There is absolutely no evidence of that. Joe Biden was relaying the Obama policy that no American aid would be forthcoming unless Ukraine fired a corrupt prosecutor. The investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time Biden went to Ukraine.

Wait, so you're saying they wanted a corrupt prosecutor to be fired, who had looked into Burisma?
So they wanted him to look into Burisma further?
And name another country that we witheld financial aid to because we didn't like their prosecutor.....ironic if this is the only one we've had that policy on.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How hard is it to answer this? Let the people decide, why not say that for every issue then?

HE won't answer because it will become the issue.....isn't that was a campaign is for?

Joe Biden is a clown....more like a marionette...who is pulling the strings?

I think the answer was already give by Pelosi. No Packing done. It's not up to the President to determine the number of Justices. That's up to the Congress. And since Pelosi already answered the question, Biden was not going to say yay or nay on it because it's not his place. If the House will not pass a Bill to that effect them it's not going to happen. And no President can change that. It's called the Separation of Powers. Rump believes that HE is king. Biden doesn't believe that he will ever be king nor does he believe that Rump can be the king either.

He got asked if he "supported" it, you dolt.

It's not up to him to support it or not. That's up to Congress. They could have asked him what flavor of Ice Cream he liked just as well and who the hell cares.

So presidents should give no opinion on matters that affect the Nation, when the decision ultimately isnt up to them? LOL
What a stupid justification.
You hacks can be so damn pathetic.

Here's a clue for you, TN. The issue facing the American people isn't whether Democrats will "unpack" the courts. Republicans have already "packed them". McConnell refused to approve any judges under Obama, slowing the approval process to an absolute crawl, and then put judging appointments on a conveyer belt once Trump was elected.

McConnell has refused to pass any legislation, or do anything for the American people except cut taxes. But he has packed the courts with a record number of conservative "judges", many of them highly unqualified and likely to fail. McConnell has made "packing the courts" the only work of the senate for the past 8 years.

All of which ignores the PROBLEMS which Trump has either ignored, mismanaged, or utterly fucked up. The opoid crisis - ignored. Covid19 - total clusterfuck. Racial unrest - cracking down on protestors. And he crashed the economy.

There is an election coming up and the public is against packing the courts which Piglosi knows quite well. If they keep the House and Biden does get in, they won't care as much because the next election will be 2 years away. If they tried to pack the courts at this stage of the game, without a doubt they will lose leadership of the House in a big way.

Actually it would not be packing the courts, but restoring the court to it's proper number of justices.

There are 13 appellate courts that sit below the U.S. Supreme Court, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 94 federal judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a court of appeals.

Right now Justice Roberts and others are assigned multiple appellate courts to oversee. Previously each justice only oversaw one circuit.

So expanding the court to 13 justices would be fair and proper.

It would? So if Trump wins reelection, you have no problem with him doing that?

So Trump should appoint 4 new Justices today?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So Trump should appoint 4 new Justices today?

Well the expansion would have to take place from Congress, and then the President gets to select more. We know that can't happen now, but if we take the White House and the House, yes, that could happen.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That is so much bullshit. There is absolutely no evidence of that. Joe Biden was relaying the Obama policy that no American aid would be forthcoming unless Ukraine fired a corrupt prosecutor. The investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time Biden went to Ukraine.

That's not what the prosecutor said in an interview with OAN news. He said he was fired specifically because Biden put pressure on them about the investigation.