Oy! Those Crafty Jews!

[rosends]

It refers to the time between 1920 and 1970:

The Expulsion of Jews from Muslim Countries

"Between 1920 and 1970, 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab and other Muslim countries.

"The 1940s were a turning point in this tragedy; of those expelled, 600,000 settled in the new state of Israel, and 300,000 in France and the United States."

Zionist provocations in 1920 consisted in publicly calling for a Jewish majority in Palestine at a time when Jews were 11% of the total population according to GoogleAI.

but your claim in post 1573 was "It seems highly likely few if any of those Jews would have been expelled from their homes if the Zionists had not struck first in Palestine."

So there must have been a "struck first" in 1920, right? What event did you have in mind? April 4, 1920?

Pogroms in Palestine before the creation of the state of Israel (1830-1948) - Fondapol

On October 7, 2023, a pogrom took place in Israel for the first time since the creation of the Jewish state.

www.fondapol.org

 

[rosends]

Israeli Jews are invading and occupying Lebanon and Syria, right?

what? Um, no. Israel is working with the Lebanese government to root out Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Are you paying attention?

 

[AnOrangeCat]

What's your interpretation of the phrase "objective evidence"?

There is no interpretation when it comes to objectivity.

Empirical evidence is objective evidence. That's stuff like statistics and literal definitions. Those are objective facts.

Screeching genocide at every single thing is subjective because it's you applying your emotions rather than your logic. It's a feeling, not a fact. So your feeling is subjective.

Feeling like Israel committed genocide even though it didn't statistically or literally.

Feelings are not facts. Just because you feel something does not make it true or a fact.

So the literal and statistical definitions of genocide are not present, just your emotional feeling. That's why I said you're like MAGA, they are guided by their feelings as well. Like the feeling that the 2020 election was stolen when objectively it wasn't. Or the feeling that Biden let in 50 bajillion people or whatever when statsitically he didn't.

You do the same thing with genocide. It's not about the literal definition because the literal definition means that no genocide has taken place.

I shouldn't have to explain this to an adult.

 

[AnOrangeCat]

"There is no consensus among international bodies, and the term 'objective evidence' is interpreted differently depending on the framework applied—specifically whether the data points to systemic war crimes or fulfills the strict legal definitions required to prove genocidal intent."

Objective facts don't become objective simply because you feel it. Your feelings do not matter.

Statistically, no genocide has taken place.

Literally, no genocide has taken place.

Only in your mind has genocide taken place, your subjective belief. Not based on evidence, but feeling. You feel that even though the Gaza population statistically is the same today as it was on 10/7, the simple fact that people died makes you feel like genocide occurred. You are misinterpreting statistics to make a subjective argument.

"The core arguments, documentation, and competing perspectives surrounding this issue outline the complexities of the debate."

Ahhh, and the backtracking begins.

Once objective facts are introduced, it becomes a "complex debate" when it wasn't like 5 posts ago when you were screeching that genocide occurred. There was no complexity in those thoughts, but now you're trying to shift the debate and argue that there was. What a loser.

Now you're saying "oh it's an interpretation of complex things." Well, only because you're making it. It's actually quite simple, genocide has a literal definition. Statistics are empirical evidence. None of your arguments are literal or empirical. They are emotional and subjective. Your mind doesn't work like that of an adult. It works like that of a child who needs to be accommodated and entitled.