Well. progress of some kind.
Before it was no difference. Now it is no difference really.
Really is used to place an emphasis on there being no difference. Again, the English Language is really not your strong suit. Stop.
See, that is the problem with talking to someone with no integrity like you. You change the meaning. What I said, me dishonest con, is that I did not check to see if there was a different domain. Because it makes no difference whether he hosts data on one domain or one thousand. Dipshit.
If you would have logged onto the website and used any of the hyperlinks, you would have seen that these 'blogs' which you claim are not part of the website are under the same domain. Of course it makes no difference to you. Every-time you are proven wrong it makes no difference. Your abject intellectual dishonesty is noted. Just stop.
Right. You are full of shit, and wasting time for absolutely no reason.
I'm wasting your time, but you've given me more than enough of your time. If I am wasting your time, you already know what to do. Simply put down the mouse, and walk away. You've been outed as an economic illiterate, poor researcher, history failure and a lair. You really don't have any more tricks up your sleeve. Just stop.
Take a look, dipshit, at what you just said. Then take a look at all of the drivel you have posted.
I don't understand what this sentence is in reference to. Maybe you should organize your responses better. Then again, why should I expect anything from someone who's post are just as organized as his thoughts. Just stop.
Nice to know you are concerned. I am retired.
Apparently, you are a lot of things. Unfortunately you knowledge does not reflect the anecdotal claims of your credentials and your maturity does not match your supposed experience. You aren't fooling anyone. Just stop.
What it does not change, me poor ignorant troll, is that he produces content that I find useful. Just as the st. Louis Fed produces content that you find useful. And he provides tools that are useful. dipshit.
Anyone can provide any tools which can be useful to anyone. What separates these sources from others are their originality. Again, I get my information from primary sources. You get your information from secondary sources. A secondary source will never hold more weight than a primary source. Just stop.
Or, I could be like you and get my information from the bat shit crazy con web sites.
FRED is not a con website. It doesn't lobby nor does it advocate for any particular ideology. Just stop.
That would be your opinion. And again, you know how much I value your opinion.
You are still defending this person. That is not an opinion. Apparently, you don't value any facts either. Just Stop.
Look, me little money changer. What I use davemanual for are specific thing. Basically, historical unemployment and historical tax data. And that data is not from some other web site. It comes from gov agencies. Always. Same place as the St. Louis Fed. Now, as a very insignificant analyst, you have decided what is the only source that you should use.
That's nice. It doesn't change the fact that it is a blog. You with your website creating experience should know that you can use Java and HTML to store these types of data on any blog. Then again, that would require to really have website creating experience. Just stop.
And now you spend your time attacking others. You really need to get a life. You look like a little toady.
Don't accuse others of what you've been doing this entire time. Remember, there are people on this forum with far better comprehension than you who can correct your dishonesty. Just stop.
And he provides data from the BLS. And from other official sites. Now, me poor pittifull little money changer, you are trying hard to say what you can that is negative about the site. For an obvious reason. But you are being totally dishonest. Here is the thing, dipshit. I have never in my life spent half the time you have looking over the davemanual web site. I only use specific tools. And those tools allow me to provide ue data, for instance, quickly. And accurately.
And again, you are still investing your time in defending the website. Although you have claimed that you are not defending the website. If you yourself claims that you only use the website for two pieces of data, then you admit that you've never examined the blog. If you did, you would know that the website is indeed a blog. It would help if you were less intellectually dishonest. Just stop.
Jesus. Most people would be embarassed to have said what you just said. I fully understand what your chart showed. I fully understand that it was not shoing dollars. Your little bitty mind apparently thinks that cost only applies to dollars. What I said was that it showed no cost in employment.
That's not what you said. Basic English fails you once more. Just Stop.
That is bs, me dear. All I have to do is take a look back at your multiple charts showing that there is a current demonstrable cost in employment resulting from the aca.
Now, that is a simple, and I mean really simple, economic statement that is the same as saying that unemployment did not increase. Dipshit. You are trying way to hard. And the statement, by the way, was exactly true.
The point wasn't to show that unemployment increased. The point of the graphs were to illustrate that part-time employment surged and full-time employment remained stagnant. If you understood economics, you could understand just by looking. But why would I expect you to understand? The mere topic just flies over your head. Just Stop.
Not funny at all. You produce a chart that shows nothing and want me to educate you on why it is nonsense. Sorry. You already have wasted too much of my time.
My charts produce everything. It's not my fault your economic understand keeps you from understanding what you are looking. Economics is just not your forte. Just Stop.
OK. good. You admit you have nothing to say, and that you simply want to waste my time. Bye Bye, now.
You admitted that you wanted to waste your time by responding to me. You already know what to do. Just stop.
Sorry, me dear. You actually have to study those disciplines to be rationally able to call yourself a believer of any of them
No you don't. You just figure out what you said for and just figure out where you align. There are test designed for this sort of thing. If you have to study an ideology in order to figure out whether or not you align with a particular one, then you are dumber than I originally imagine. It's not rocket science. But maybe to you it is.
You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. Just Stop.
You study nothing. You simply produce charts. And that is the cheap way to produce belief. Stupid. Because you are WAY short of resources.
Someone who has all the resources is way to short of resources. Can't figure out a way to identify the most ignorant part of that sentence. Just stop.
And your concepts are based on what you want to show.
I show what is relative to the discussion at hand. You talk about stimulus, I show data in regards to Government spending from a specific time period. You speak about unemployment, I show data with unemployment. You clearly don't know how to look for data, which is why you think a blog is the hallmark of economic data. Just Stop.
Funny. You voice complete confidence, but provide very, very, very little. There are sources, me dear. People and organizations that provide actual concept well spelled out and with every effort to consider all possibilities. And most have access to the resources you lack.
Good for them. Just stop.
Which is why you can not be taken seriously. And why you will never, ever be of any import.
Apparently, I care alot of is random person on an online forum will take me seriously. This person has poor spelling, grammar skills, economic understanding, historical knowledge and researching skills, but I'm suppose to care if this person takes me seriously. I don't know how I will be able to sleep at night. Although I will be sleeping like a baby in a few minutes.
Just stop. Enough...
