Recently, an E-7 Green Beret was visiting some family member in a town in Illinois, and was in a bowling alley on a Saturday night, apparently alone, and didn't know a soul in the place, according to police. He pulled out his 9mm and started shooting, killing 4 people. Dude was a decorated veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq, special forces Green Beret.
And is it required that people who shoot up places have to all be veterans?
Oh, but there is a connection with the location. You see, Webb's father was injured in a DUI accident a few months earlier, by an employee of the bar & grill they were all picking food up at.
But once again, to you all vets with PTSD are obviously walking guns just waiting to go off. I got it, you bought completely into that "Killer with PRDS" trope that has been going around since Vietnam.
But please, give me a seriously researched article showing what percentage of mass shooters and murderers are veterans. I know because I have looked, and find almost nothing but biased hack propaganda pieces. Here is one of the funniest from just a few months ago, that actually had me laughing when I first read it.
There’s no need to have any contact with the U.S. military in order to dress and act as if you’re in the military, as many mass-shooters do, some of them waging their own delusional wars against immigrants or other groups. But it is remarkable that at least 36% of U.S. mass shooters (and quite possibly more) have in fact been trained by the U.S. military.
Of course, he throws out all women automatically, and anybody over 59. And any not born in the US. Then you have this gem:
I’ve also deleted some of the shooting incidents, reducing the list from 121 to 106 shootings. I’ve done this, just as on past occasion, in order to be able to make an accurate comparison to the general population.
No explanation of who or why, just that he removed 15 cases, for reasons only his own to make the statistics come out as he liked.
I’ve also deleted one shooting that was an attack on the U.S. military by a foreign-born shooter, as it seems irrelevant to ask if that shooter had been in the U.S. military.
Hmmm, interesting. I wanted to look through his data, but it is no longer available. The original at Mother Jones was, but I find it strange that his is not anymore. But let's move on.
Looking at the 106 shootings in the remaining database, I’ve marked 38 of them as being committed by U.S. military veterans. In three cases, this indicates a veteran of JROTC, one of whom may or may not have had further participation in the military.
Really, JROTC? Three of them are in JROTC, therefore were "military"? Holy hell, why not include all that were in Scouts while you are at it, a "paramilitary organization".
And finally, his conclusion.
The result of all this is that, with this updated database, 36% of U.S. mass shooters (lone, male, 18-59) are veterans. If we leave out the three who are only veterans of JROTC, we still get 33% being veterans.
So in other words, after throwing out huge numbers of cases for his own often undisclosed purposes in order to make the data match what he wanted to see, he concluded that 36% of mass shooters were military.
WHERE DO AMERICA’S MASS SHOOTERS COME FROM--It is extremely easy in the United States to obtain guns, to find places to practice using them, and to find tr
www.citywatchla.com
But I can see you buy completely into that nonsense. And I am sure you will now be using this completely bogus "study" compiled in the most unscientific manner possible as proof that you are right.
David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is executive director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson‘s books include War Is A Lie.
Nice to see the "We hate Veterans" movement is back. We have missed them since Vietnam.