Out-Sourcing American Jobs

[Sonny Clark]

Severely penalizing the out-sourcing of that job.

dear, if they cant move out they must pay higher wages here and then charge higher prices here too and then go bankrupt.

Do you understand???

Regardless of the outcome, businesses can NOT be forced to unionize, period. FYI - There are many businesses that are not unionized. Union have been on the decline for many years now. And, we still have a majority of business that are NOT unionized. Being unionized is not a requirement.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

, stupid businesses allow them to do it.

dear, if its stupid to let them in then we should make them illegal again.

Do you understand?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

we still have a majority of business that are NOT unionized..

so???? the threat is always there. This is why BMW Boeing and others go to free states rather to union states with experienced auto workers.

Do you understand now??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How do you force a job to return to this country?

Severely penalizing the out-sourcing of that job.

The only thing that will do is move the entire company out of the country.

Maybe so. But, at least they wont get a free pass like they're doing now. And, some may move out, no doubt, but I also doubt all of them will. At least someone will be standing up for American workers.

They have a saying for this.

Cutting off your nose to spite your face.

liberal without IQ for substance

 

[Sonny Clark]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

Those are NOT laws that require a business to unionize. If what you're saying is true, then every business in this country would be unionized as required by law. Why do we have so many businesses that are NOT unionized if there are laws that require it? Can you answer that? So, you're saying that any business in this country that is not unionized is breaking the law? Pleeeeeease !!!

 

[Darkwind]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

dear, we don't take reading assignments from liberals. IF you cant make your point why bother to be here?

A liberal? LOL....I'm beginning to think that the liberals are right about the intellect of their opponents

If you wish to spout ignorance, go right ahead. I don't do other peoples work, however. I provided the laws that specifically show that business does NOT have the right to keep unions from trying to organize with their employees. Only that they have a means of resisting.

It is illegal to keep employees from wishing to talk to, or try to organize.

While you are all at it, look up the procedures and rules of the Bargaining Unit.

 

[Darkwind]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

Those are NOT laws that require a business to unionize. If what you're saying is true, then every business in this country would be unionized as required by law. Why do we have so many businesses that are NOT unionized if there are laws that require it? Can you answer that? So, you're saying that any business in this country that is not unionized is breaking the law? Pleeeeeease !!!

Again, go read the laws.

eta: BTW...stating law is not avocation of Unions.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

Those are NOT laws that require a business to unionize. If what you're saying is true, then every business in this country would be unionized as required by law. Why do we have so many businesses that are NOT unionized if there are laws that require it? Can you answer that? So, you're saying that any business in this country that is not unionized is breaking the law? Pleeeeeease !!!

dear, the Wagner Act and other act make unions far more likely. If you say it is stupid to let unions in then you should want to make them illegal again to bring back 30 millionjobs or so.

 

[Sonny Clark]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

dear, we don't take reading assignments from liberals. IF you cant make your point why bother to be here?

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

Those are NOT laws that require a business to unionize. If what you're saying is true, then every business in this country would be unionized as required by law. Why do we have so many businesses that are NOT unionized if there are laws that require it? Can you answer that? So, you're saying that any business in this country that is not unionized is breaking the law? Pleeeeeease !!!

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

dear, we don't take reading assignments from liberals. IF you cant make your point why bother to be here?

I have made my point very well. There are NO laws that require businesses to unionize, period. If what you're saying is true, then we have hundreds of thousands of businesses operating illegally. The majority of businesses in this country are NOT unionized. It is NOT a law that businesses be unionized. And, you can't show me a law that says otherwise. There are no laws that require every single business in this country to be unionized.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I provided the laws that specifically show that business does NOT have the right to keep unions from trying to organize with their employees. .

all agree you idiot!!!!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

There are NO laws that require businesses to unionize, period..

all agree you idiot!!

 

[Sonny Clark]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

Those are NOT laws that require a business to unionize. If what you're saying is true, then every business in this country would be unionized as required by law. Why do we have so many businesses that are NOT unionized if there are laws that require it? Can you answer that? So, you're saying that any business in this country that is not unionized is breaking the law? Pleeeeeease !!!

Again, go read the laws.

eta: BTW...stating law is not avocation of Unions.

I have read the laws, thank you. And, there are NO laws that state that every business in this country must be unionized. We have hundreds of thousands of businesses in this country that are not unionized and they are not breaking the law by not being unionized.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

there are NO laws that state that every business in this country must be unionized.

all agree you idiot. You have made what we call a strawman argument.

 

[Sonny Clark]

I provided the laws that specifically show that business does NOT have the right to keep unions from trying to organize with their employees. .

all agree you idiot!!!!

I am NOT an idiot.

 

[rdean]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Too stupid for words.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Too stupid for words.

of course if it was the liberal would not be so afraid to say why. What does your fear teach us?

 

[Sonny Clark]

I provided the laws that specifically show that business does NOT have the right to keep unions from trying to organize with their employees. .

all agree you idiot!!!!

I am NOT an idiot.

I am NOT an idiot.

They can try to unionize, true. But, the law does not require a business to be unionized. If it were a law that all businesses must be unionized, then we have hundreds of thousands of businesses breaking the law.

 

[Darkwind]

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

dear, we don't take reading assignments from liberals. IF you cant make your point why bother to be here?

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

Those are NOT laws that require a business to unionize. If what you're saying is true, then every business in this country would be unionized as required by law. Why do we have so many businesses that are NOT unionized if there are laws that require it? Can you answer that? So, you're saying that any business in this country that is not unionized is breaking the law? Pleeeeeease !!!

Should businesses be penalized for out-sourcing jobs to foreign countries?

too stupid!! Business moves because liberal govt forces them to with unions and taxes and deficits. Eliminate those and you'd have 30 million new jobs tomorrow.

Having a union in your business is no one's fault except the business that allows them to come in. No one forces a business to operate with union employees. Businesses make that choice themselves. And, businesses have been dealing with taxes and regulations since there were businesses. And, what deficits are you referring to?

Perhaps you should read before replying.

Go look up the Wagner Act, wihich is he National Labor Relations act of 1935. Then go look up the Taft-Hartley Ac of 1947 and finally, the Landrum Griffin Act of 1959.

When you have completed that reading, you should then have a good idea of where to go next to look at labor law with regard to unions.

dear, we don't take reading assignments from liberals. IF you cant make your point why bother to be here?

I have made my point very well. There are NO laws that require businesses to unionize, period. If what you're saying is true, then we have hundreds of thousands of businesses operating illegally. The majority of businesses in this country are NOT unionized. It is NOT a law that businesses be unionized. And, you can't show me a law that says otherwise. There are no laws that require every single business in this country to be unionized.

You haven't made your point. Business is required to allow employees to organize. Comprehending the english language is critical for discussions with adults.

When I say allow, I do not mean to say that they are permitted to just suddenly become a union. There is a process that must be followed, and that process is outlined in the three laws I listed. Businesses are forbidden by these laws from interfering with this process. They can fight back during the process, but they absolutely cannot interfere with it. Employees are ALLOWED to speak with unions and among themselves (off company time and property) to discuss organizing.

Now, when you wish to have a discussion, let someone know. Stating your OPINION and declaring (as you did in another thread) you are not going to change your mind is not a conversation nor is it a debate. Why not just state an opinion in the "letters to the editor" page of your paper and save the rest of us you narrow-minded viewpoint.

Get back to Me when you are ready to learn something.

Have a nice night.

 

[Sonny Clark]

, stupid businesses allow them to do it.

dear, if its stupid to let them in then we should make them illegal again.

Do you understand?

Unions are NOT illegal. I have never ever said that unions were illegal. Unions are legal, very legal.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I provided the laws that specifically show that business does NOT have the right to keep unions from trying to organize with their employees. .

all agree you idiot!!!!

I am NOT an idiot.

then why do you go to great lengths to point out that with which everyone agrees??

I suggest you ask questions rather than make ignorant assertions. Nobody can fault you for asking questions.