Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? .
Admittily not the smartest move he made... Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? Which is bad? Her or him? Maybe both? Be we all know in your mind Clinton can never be a bad person even when all evidence for the last 25 years show otherwise.ty, but one correction...Donald JR knew with the meeting with the Russian GVT pawns in JUNE 2016, not July...Again, are you trying to sound stupid? No evidence has been released to indicate there ever was a legitimate basis for the investigation. In fact, no evidence has ever been released that the Russian government had anything to do with the DNC hack or the Wikileaks emails. The question here for anyone interested in the facts is did the Russian government try to influence the election with some sort of covert activities, for which there is not one piece of evidence we know of, or did the American government, the Obama administration, try to influence the election by inventing an entirely false narrative about the Russians, for which there is mounting evidence.
Good thing that time has proved you wrong. From George Papadoloulus being told of the russian emails in March 2016, Donald Jr being told of the russian emails in July 2016, along with Carter Pages russian meeting in June 2016, Stones email hunt 2016.
And now the question is what's Michael Flynns current jeopardy. The fact he hasn't been charged (that we know of) means as Trumps closest adviser, Mueller is purposefully NOT charging Flynn, to prevent Trump from giving him a pardon. Since you can't give a pardon without spelling out what crimes the pardon is for or the time span during which those crimes were committed.
Clinton didn't pay the Russian Government for illegally obtained, dirt on Donald Trump? What in the world...??????????? Gosh, you are believing just anything....!
Again, are you trying to sound stupid? No evidence has been released to indicate there ever was a legitimate basis for the investigation. In fact, no evidence has ever been released that the Russian government had anything to do with the DNC hack or the Wikileaks emails. The question here for anyone interested in the facts is did the Russian government try to influence the election with some sort of covert activities, for which there is not one piece of evidence we know of, or did the American government, the Obama administration, try to influence the election by inventing an entirely false narrative about the Russians, for which there is mounting evidence.
Good thing that time has proved you wrong. From George Papadoloulus being told of the russian emails in March 2016, Donald Jr being told of the russian emails in July 2016, along with Carter Pages russian meeting in June 2016, Stones email hunt 2016.
And now the question is what's Michael Flynns current jeopardy. The fact he hasn't been charged (that we know of) means as Trumps closest adviser, Mueller is purposefully NOT charging Flynn, to prevent Trump from giving him a pardon. Since you can't give a pardon without spelling out what crimes the pardon is for or the time span during which those crimes were committed.
Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? .
Hillary didn't pay for the dossier.
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community
Again, are you trying to sound stupid? No evidence has been released to indicate there ever was a legitimate basis for the investigation. In fact, no evidence has ever been released that the Russian government had anything to do with the DNC hack or the Wikileaks emails. The question here for anyone interested in the facts is did the Russian government try to influence the election with some sort of covert activities, for which there is not one piece of evidence we know of, or did the American government, the Obama administration, try to influence the election by inventing an entirely false narrative about the Russians, for which there is mounting evidence.
Good thing that time has proved you wrong. From George Papadoloulus being told of the russian emails in March 2016, Donald Jr being told of the russian emails in July 2016, along with Carter Pages russian meeting in June 2016, Stones email hunt 2016.
And now the question is what's Michael Flynns current jeopardy. The fact he hasn't been charged (that we know of) means as Trumps closest adviser, Mueller is purposefully NOT charging Flynn, to prevent Trump from giving him a pardon. Since you can't give a pardon without spelling out what crimes the pardon is for or the time span during which those crimes were committed.
You mistake speculation for facts. Keep eating Trumps spin... I hear it tastes like Ketchup on a well done FiletBased on the facts in evidence so far that does seem to be the case, but I understand a true believer like you doesn't have much use for facts.Yeah you're right... the Dem's were completely guilty and the Republicans caught them... Now the Republicans are innocent and Dem's are on a baseless witch hunt. Your objectivity is outstanding!It was hardly a joke to see Obama's AG conspiring with Bill Clinton to shut down the investigation into the Clinton Foundation and to grant immunity to all of Clinton's top aides without providing any explanation of how this benefited the country. There was a mountain load of evidence of Clinton's guilt made public before Lynch shut down the investigation and we have the estimates of Clinton's top aides that they had committed crimes but as we have both observed not one piece of hard evidence has been provided to indicate there was ever any basis for the investigation or the Trump campaign.Your hypocrisy rings true and loud in your last statement. It's quite comical. Clinton and her aides were obviously guilty despite the lack of evidence that was turned up in the investigation while the new investigation is a baseless witch hunt targeting trump and his innocent administration. Ok buddy. What a joke.You're still in denial. We know exactly what happened in the case of Clinton's server. We know Loretta Lynch shut down the FBI's investigation into the Clinton Foundation and after having a very improper conversation with Bill Clinton, we know Loretta Lynch gave immunity to all of Hillary's top aides. I doubt there is anyone in America with an IQ above 70 who thinks there was nothing criminal about Hillary's actions except for those who believe she was too incompetent to know what her senior staff was doing.
As far as anyone knows there never was any basis for this investigation other than the Obama administration's desire to influence the election in favor of Clinton and the Democratic Party's desire to rally its fractured base and obstruct the Trump administration. I suppose some people might think your expressed blind faith that the government would never launch a fraudulent criminal investigation for political reasons is admirable; I am not one of them. The Congressional investigations were made necessary by the great success the Obama administration had in promoting its Russia hoax, but if you are watching you know the direction they are taking is towards investigation possible criminal actions taken by members of the Obama administration in promoting the Russia hoax.
Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? .
Hillary didn't pay for the dossier.
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community
you need to start with washington free beacon, with regards to dossier.Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? .
Hillary didn't pay for the dossier.
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community
Man, are you setting a high bar for Idiocy of the Year!
The link itself says "Clinton campaign". Was there some other Clinton running?
Also, doing what they did in dealing with a foreign agent, they violated FEC law.
you need to start with washington free beacon, with regards to dossier.Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? .
Hillary didn't pay for the dossier.
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community
Man, are you setting a high bar for Idiocy of the Year!
The link itself says "Clinton campaign". Was there some other Clinton running?
Also, doing what they did in dealing with a foreign agent, they violated FEC law.
Yet he is bad for trying to do the very thing Hillary Clinton paid the same government for ? .
Hillary didn't pay for the dossier.
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community
Hillary ran her campaign, AND the DNC?Of course the Corporate Whore didn't spend her own money. but, since she ran her campaign, and her campaign ran the DNC, it's virtually the same thing and you KNOW it.
Hillary ran her campaign, AND the DNC?Of course the Corporate Whore didn't spend her own money. but, since she ran her campaign, and her campaign ran the DNC, it's virtually the same thing and you KNOW it.
How come Trump wasn't runing the RNC?
Explain why it only applies to democrats.
Bad comparison, Flynn was out because of dubious contacts; McMaster may be asked o leave because a dubious president wants him out.Who would have thought what is old is new.
Now McMaster is on a countdown to how long he will be National Security Advisor.
How long before McMaster is out like Flynn?
Stupid question. Flynn was out because he lied to the FBI and to Pence about a meeting he had, and if McMaster is fired it will be because he did not perform his duties satisfactorily.Who would have thought what is old is new.
Now McMaster is on a countdown to how long he will be National Security Advisor.
How long before McMaster is out like Flynn?
How many billions will Mueller and Strzok have to pay Flynn when this is all done
