Again, are you trying to sound stupid? No evidence has been released to indicate there ever was a legitimate basis for the investigation. In fact, no evidence has ever been released that the Russian government had anything to do with the DNC hack or the Wikileaks emails. The question here for anyone interested in the facts is did the Russian government try to influence the election with some sort of covert activities, for which there is not one piece of evidence we know of, or did the American government, the Obama administration, try to influence the election by inventing an entirely false narrative about the Russians, for which there is mounting evidence.
Good thing that time has proved you wrong. From George Papadoloulus being told of the russian emails in March 2016, Donald Jr being told of the russian emails in July 2016, along with Carter Pages russian meeting in June 2016, Stones email hunt 2016.
And now the question is what's Michael Flynns current jeopardy. The fact he hasn't been charged (that we know of) means as Trumps closest adviser, Mueller is purposefully NOT charging Flynn, to prevent Trump from giving him a pardon. Since you can't give a pardon without spelling out what crimes the pardon is for or the time span during which those crimes were committed.