koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,131
- 14,035
- 2,190
In no uncertain terms.
Do not believe what the press and asshats here tell you. Ranchers do not despise the Bundys or any of the people who protested the egregious abuses they have suffered at the hands of out of control, criminal thugs.
The jury, who were presented the facts sans the media filter, came to the only verdict that decent Americans could come to when faced with reality in these cases. It is NOT conspiracy to commit terrorism to criticize your government, and make plans to address criminal actions of government officials. And specifically, these people did NOT, EVER, in ANY WAY *threaten* anybody. Declaring our intent to defend yourself from illegal attack is NOT a threat. Walking onto public property and declaring your intent to stay is NOT conspiracy to commit terrorism.
And here's the kicker...taking a GOVERNMENT OWNED VEHICLE in the course of a protest, and moving it around, does NOT constitute theft when adverse possession has been established.
That's the one that's giving the feds fits right now. If they're smart, anyway.
At any rate, here's the Oregon Cattlemen's statement, posted on facebook:
Oregon Cattlemen's Association | Facebook
Do not believe what the press and asshats here tell you. Ranchers do not despise the Bundys or any of the people who protested the egregious abuses they have suffered at the hands of out of control, criminal thugs.
The jury, who were presented the facts sans the media filter, came to the only verdict that decent Americans could come to when faced with reality in these cases. It is NOT conspiracy to commit terrorism to criticize your government, and make plans to address criminal actions of government officials. And specifically, these people did NOT, EVER, in ANY WAY *threaten* anybody. Declaring our intent to defend yourself from illegal attack is NOT a threat. Walking onto public property and declaring your intent to stay is NOT conspiracy to commit terrorism.
And here's the kicker...taking a GOVERNMENT OWNED VEHICLE in the course of a protest, and moving it around, does NOT constitute theft when adverse possession has been established.
That's the one that's giving the feds fits right now. If they're smart, anyway.
At any rate, here's the Oregon Cattlemen's statement, posted on facebook:
Oregon Cattlemen's Association | Facebook