Oral Arguments in "Opt-out" Case

[rightwinger]

Not if we are ruled by the views of "some people."

Gays are “yucky” so I don’t want them to marry

 

[martybegan]

Not if we are ruled by the views of "some people."

We are ruled by the Constitution in theory, but due to the left that is becoming less so as time goes on.

 

[Zincwarrior]

We are ruled by the Constitution in theory, but due to the left that is becoming less so as time goes on.

That is definitely, your opinion.

 

[martybegan]

That is definitely, your opinion.

I have never pretended otherwise.

 

[Seymour Flops]

In the matter of race with Loving.

Changing the marriage contract to include same sex couples is a matter for legislatures, not the courts.

At most Obergfell should have made all States recognize SSM licenses issued by other States under full faith and credit, that's it.

Yes, that would have been consistent with the Constitution.

Obergfell was grandstanding.

 

[martybegan]

Yes, that would have been consistent with the Constitution.

Obergfell was grandstanding.

Agreed. To me they should have said, "you don't have to issue them, but you do have to recognize them"

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

People of the same sex "married" cant do the same things normal couple do.

The two, are actually not the same thing, quit calling them the same

Betrayal by the Dead Right

Sex is between male and female only. "Homosexuality" is a contradictory word, just as "pedosexuality" will be when the know-it-all media start using it.

Notice that Conservatives never call into question the usage of "homosexuality" to describe an escapist neurosis. They're always appeasing our enemies and should be ejected from the Republican Party just like the White Replacement Democrats ejected the Segregationists in the Sick Sixties.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

the state could not prove any damage

No harm, no foul

Gorillamen Prefer Blondes

Nicole System could have, if OJ had let her live to tell about it.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

That is the law

Oligarchy of Nine Lawyers Who Couldn't Make It in Private Practice

Non-binding SCROTUS opinion. The state referendums are the only law a self-determining nation has to obey. The Gayist Mafia lost every one of them.

 

[Eman623]

If it is legal, then schools can cover it

Just because a parent has limited views of morality, a school should not have to pander to it.

Gays get married
Parents need to accept it

So if I write a children's book about a puppy that gets lost at a gun show called Freedom Puppy and we met a host of colorful characters celebrating their 2nd Amendment rights, that's legal and schools can cover it, and no you can't opt out your kids, right?

We can even have an alphabet lesson in the book. A is for AR-15. H is for Hollow Point. You get the idea. Fun!

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Not if we are ruled by the views of "some people."

Clip the Clique

We are ruled by nine black-robed puppets of the Deep State. We must cut their strings.

 

[rightwinger]

So if I write a children's book about a puppy that gets lost at a gun show called Freedom Puppy and we met a host of colorful characters celebrating their 2nd Amendment rights, that's legal and schools can cover it, and no you can't opt out your kids, right?

We can even have an alphabet lesson in the book. A is for AR-15. H is for Hollow Point. You get the idea. Fun!

2nd amendment rights?
I grew up in the 60s with westerns and cop shows
I saw people getting shot several times a day
I saw Bambi’s mom getting shot by hunters

 

[Zincwarrior]

2nd amendment rights?
I grew up in the 60s with westerns and cop shows
I saw people getting shot several times a day
I saw Bambi’s mom getting shot by hunters

 

[elektra]

Afraid a same sex marriage is just as valid as yours

I did not say one thing about what politicians consider valid to gain votes.

I said a man and a man is not the same as a man and a woman you are arguing they are the same thing

man and man cand do what a man and woman can.

 

[rightwinger]

I did not say one thing about what politicians consider valid to gain votes.

I said a man and a man is not the same as a man and a woman you are arguing they are the same thing

man and man cand do what a man and woman can.

How they express affection is none of your business

 

[Rawley]

How they express affection is none of your business

Let me guess, you're going to make the kosher Jewish kid eat ham sandwiches for lunch.

 

[rightwinger]

Let me guess, you're going to make the kosher Jewish kid eat ham sandwiches for lunch.

?

 

[elektra]

How they express affection is none of your business

I have not talked about affection.

It is amazing, are you purposely stupid?
A man and a man or a woman and a woman can not do the same thing as a man and a woman.

Why do you insist they are the same thing?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Let me guess, you're going to make the kosher Jewish kid eat ham sandwiches for lulunch.

Of course!

If the Jewish kids don't eat the ham sandwiches and bacon cheeseburgers, the cafeteria ladies that make those would feel excluded, and marginalized.

The Muslim kids would be excempt, though.

 

[rightwinger]

I have not talked about affection.

It is amazing, are you purposely stupid?
A man and a man or a woman and a woman can not do the same thing as a man and a woman.

Why do you insist they are the same thing?

What possible difference does it make in terms of getting married?