C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
PC
What does any of this have to do with Freedom of Speech?
Even us ignerant publik skool kids can tell your OP makes no point
And it makes even less sense than usual.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PC
What does any of this have to do with Freedom of Speech?
Even us ignerant publik skool kids can tell your OP makes no point
PC
What does any of this have to do with Freedom of Speech?
Even us ignerant publik skool kids can tell your OP makes no point
And it makes even less sense than usual.
The Federalist Papers do not carry the weight of law.
they are only the opinions and perspectives of the individuals who wrote the constitution and bill of rights. but then again, liberal idiots don't care about what the intent was. they only care about their subversive agendas
Nonsense.
Liberals correctly understand that the Constitution exists in the context of its case law.
They also correctly follow that case law as intended by the Framers.
The author of this thread needs to attempt to understand the principle of presumption of innocence,
aka innocent until proven guilty.
I see Stalin, lennin and marx are firmly implanted in yourswrong, we elect the members of the federal government they work for us. they are not an all powerful entity that can make decisions in a vaccuum and go against our will, change our rights or infringe on them.
LOL, Yes, we elect some members of the Federal Government and many times do make "decisions in a vacuum" and have gone against the will of, for example, Southern Governors who hoped to keep schools separate but equal. You might consider reading a book sometime, I suspect the Limbaugh letter or History revised by Hannity, et al, has infected your brain.
The Constitution gives the federal government a massive amount of power, and legal supremacy.
Without it, your rights could not be protected. It is the power of the federal goverment that protects your rights, not some imaginary limitation of power.
The author of this thread needs to attempt to understand the principle of presumption of innocence,
aka innocent until proven guilty.
The author of this thread needs to attempt to understand the principle of presumption of innocence,
aka innocent until proven guilty.
If this were a court of law, you might have a point. It isn't, you don't.
The Constitution gives the federal government a massive amount of power, and legal supremacy.
Without it, your rights could not be protected. It is the power of the federal goverment that protects your rights, not some imaginary limitation of power.
So, we can't be free unless we submit completely to our rulers and obey without question?
Thanks Comrade, now I can take up the chains of "freedom."
Orwell lives.
So the Federal Government does not possess the power to enforce the protections of your rights provided in the Constitution?
Are you mad?
The Federalist Papers do not carry the weight of law.
they are only the opinions and perspectives of the individuals who wrote the constitution and bill of rights. but then again, liberal idiots don't care about what the intent was. they only care about their subversive agendas
Intent of the written word was pretty specific - to the point of obsession (and thank heaven) back in the day. The intent of the letters were to hammer out the end results - the specificity of their collective words. The Constitution is the end result of all that wrangling, almost as if they foresaw all this petty and ridiculous bickering and splitting of hairs over the definitions of "all" "rights" "speech," and...um...ALL.
I see Stalin, lennin and marx are firmly implanted in yoursLOL, Yes, we elect some members of the Federal Government and many times do make "decisions in a vacuum" and have gone against the will of, for example, Southern Governors who hoped to keep schools separate but equal. You might consider reading a book sometime, I suspect the Limbaugh letter or History revised by Hannity, et al, has infected your brain.
If you see that alone you're more than myopic, you're blind.
Tell us, for the record, did Nixon use the IRS against his enemies or not? Since you're on record once that he did, and once that he didn't, as I documented,
I do believe a clarification would be in order.
I get it now, Nixon's attempt failed, therefore he's exonerated.
So the Federal Government does not possess the power to enforce the protections of your rights provided in the Constitution?
Are you mad?
Forgive me for engaging you seriously for a moment; I realize you are just a KOS kiddie spewing mindless party slogans...
BUT!
I have the right of free speech. Do I need Federal Overlords to enforce that right? No, I only need them not to INFRINGE that right. The right exists of its own volition, up until the moment that an agent of the state infringes it.
So your talking point is idiocy.
Tell us, for the record, did Nixon use the IRS against his enemies or not? Since you're on record once that he did, and once that he didn't, as I documented,
I do believe a clarification would be in order.
Either way, we know for a fact that Obama did, and continues to.
But you have no problem that that, because your party is above the law.
You have the freedom to be intimidated and bullied by thugs.
IRS Abuse: It doesn't take a brain surgeon to know that the IRS audit of Dr. Ben Carson can't be a mere coincidence.
In any powerful syndicate, the capos know who to whack without the godfather ordering it.
The only way the FBI could put Gambino crime family boss John Gotti in prison was to bug an old lady's apartment in New York's Little Italy and record him giving orders to kill.
But until the FBI bugs the West Wing of the White House, or the Treasury building next door, or the Internal Revenue Service's headquarters a few blocks to the southeast, we might never know the exact origin of America's tax collectors harassing President Obama's political adversaries.
Maybe there was never an explicit order. Considering the threat of being overheard, it's part of the job of the capos to know what the boss wants and make him happy by giving it to him without him even having to ask.
The IRS and the Obama administration are on the same page when it comes to big government: Tea Partiers and other conservatives threaten the massive state they love, and the IRS' powerful army of bureaucrats is a pretty handy weapon for use against them.
In the already blossoming IRS scandal, political organizations' applications for tax-exempt status were delayed or denied during last year's presidential campaign, and well into this year, simply because their names sounded too conservative. The IRS audit of renowned neurosurgeon Carson looks like exactly the same kind of abuse, and it must be subject to a formal independent investigation.
Carson on Wednesday told Fox's Bill O'Reilly that the IRS began examining his real estate holdings after his speech to the National Prayer Breakfast in February, in which he used tithing in the Bible to make a compelling case against progressive taxation. A humiliated Obama sat steaming a couple of seats away.
Carson said, "there must be something inherently fair about proportionality. You make $10 billion, you put in a billion. You make $10, you put in $1."
The black Detroit-born son of a single mother, who rose from poverty to the top of the medical profession, added, "Now some people say that's not fair because it doesn't hurt the guy who made $10 billion as much as the guy who made $10. Where does it say you have to hurt the guy? He's just put in a billion in the pot. We don't need to hurt him."
The author of this thread needs to attempt to understand the principle of presumption of innocence,
aka innocent until proven guilty.
The Constitution gives the federal government a massive amount of power, and legal supremacy.
Without it, your rights could not be protected. It is the power of the federal goverment that protects your rights, not some imaginary limitation of power.
So, we can't be free unless we submit completely to our rulers and obey without question?
Thanks Comrade, now I can take up the chains of "freedom."
Orwell lives.