Oooh ...

[KittenKoder]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

 

[KittenKoder]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

While true, many of us independent voters wouldn't have let that sway our choices, party affiliation means little to the educated thinkers. I believe McCains failure in getting our votes had to do more with who he chose for VP, which made us question what his other choices may be if he had won. The fence sitters though I believe only chose Obama to "follow the popular crowd", as sad as that sounds. Fence sitters tend not to think much about what's possible, otherwise race would have been much closer because McCain had a lot of good answers. Again though, his showing what he picks for positions in government does say a lot about him, and was the only reason I, myself, abstained from voting completely this time around.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

Not a single "American" voted for Senator Hussein... the next one term Democrat Presidential failure.

 

[alan1]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

While true, many of us independent voters wouldn't have let that sway our choices, party affiliation means little to the educated thinkers. I believe McCains failure in getting our votes had to do more with who he chose for VP, which made us question what his other choices may be if he had won. The fence sitters though I believe only chose Obama to "follow the popular crowd", as sad as that sounds. Fence sitters tend not to think much about what's possible, otherwise race would have been much closer because McCain had a lot of good answers. Again though, his showing what he picks for positions in government does say a lot about him, and was the only reason I, myself, abstained from voting completely this time around.

Interesting. I voted for or against everything/everybody on my ballot. This was the first time in my life I didn't cast a vote in a presidential election. None of the options were palatable to me.

 

[KittenKoder]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

Not a single "American" voted for Senator Hussein... the next one term Democrat Presidential failure.

By your logic not a single "American" voted for Bush Jr., since he didn't do anything to help either and Obama is pretty much doing the same crap he did.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Another Flame Zone ... only this time toward my favorite people *sarcasm* ...

I will open the first non-Rush one with ....

... how much "American False Gods" is ruining American culture and how they are helping to dumb down the US. I think it's about the only reason Obama was popular and won the election, because people are basing all their choices on factors that these people on this show win for: Appearance, Speech, and Controversy.

Any ideas or comments?

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

While true, many of us independent voters wouldn't have let that sway our choices, party affiliation means little to the educated thinkers. I believe McCains failure in getting our votes had to do more with who he chose for VP, which made us question what his other choices may be if he had won. The fence sitters though I believe only chose Obama to "follow the popular crowd", as sad as that sounds. Fence sitters tend not to think much about what's possible, otherwise race would have been much closer because McCain had a lot of good answers. Again though, his showing what he picks for positions in government does say a lot about him, and was the only reason I, myself, abstained from voting completely this time around.

ROFLMNAO... She's denigrating 'fence sitters', while she defines herself as one who was unable to make decision.

McCain had no chance of winning that election and his choice of Palin put him within 4 points of winning. Absent Palin, without regard of another candidate McCain would have given th democrats a 10-15 pt spread.

 

[KittenKoder]

Much truth is what you say, but recall that McCain was ahead prior to the financial meltdown. Americans were angry, and the GOP was in power, so they had to be punished.

I am surprised that President Obama still has high poll numbers, around 65%. Time will tell if the same anger will reverse Dem fortunes.

While true, many of us independent voters wouldn't have let that sway our choices, party affiliation means little to the educated thinkers. I believe McCains failure in getting our votes had to do more with who he chose for VP, which made us question what his other choices may be if he had won. The fence sitters though I believe only chose Obama to "follow the popular crowd", as sad as that sounds. Fence sitters tend not to think much about what's possible, otherwise race would have been much closer because McCain had a lot of good answers. Again though, his showing what he picks for positions in government does say a lot about him, and was the only reason I, myself, abstained from voting completely this time around.

ROFLMNAO... She's denigrating 'fence sitters', while she defines herself as one who was unable to make decision.

McCain had no chance of winning that election and his choice of Palin put him within 4 points of winning. Absent Palin, without regard of another candidate McCain would have given th democrats a 10-15 pt spread.

Deciding not to pick between a giant douche and a turd sandwich is still a choice, to choose one over the other is to make a bad choice because really ... nobody wins. Use your head not your blind faith sometime ...

Fence sitters tend to vote for the popular candidates without thinking, kinda like you vote for one just because of the party.

 

[alan1]

Deciding not to pick between a giant douche and a turd sandwich is still a choice, to choose one over the other is to make a bad choice because really ... nobody wins. Use your head not your blind faith sometime ...

Fence sitters tend to vote for the popular candidates without thinking, kinda like you vote for one just because of the party.

Wait a minute, one of them was only a giant douche?

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

While true, many of us independent voters wouldn't have let that sway our choices, party affiliation means little to the educated thinkers. I believe McCains failure in getting our votes had to do more with who he chose for VP, which made us question what his other choices may be if he had won. The fence sitters though I believe only chose Obama to "follow the popular crowd", as sad as that sounds. Fence sitters tend not to think much about what's possible, otherwise race would have been much closer because McCain had a lot of good answers. Again though, his showing what he picks for positions in government does say a lot about him, and was the only reason I, myself, abstained from voting completely this time around.

ROFLMNAO... She's denigrating 'fence sitters', while she defines herself as one who was unable to make decision.

McCain had no chance of winning that election and his choice of Palin put him within 4 points of winning. Absent Palin, without regard of another candidate McCain would have given th democrats a 10-15 pt spread.

Deciding not to pick between a giant douche and a turd sandwich is still a choice, to choose one over the other is to make a bad choice because really ... nobody wins. Use your head not your blind faith sometime ...

Fence sitters tend to vote for the popular candidates without thinking, kinda like you vote for one just because of the party.

ROFL... So you're arguing that you chose to NOT MAKE A CHOICE?

Oh GOD that's precious... 'Choosing to not make a choice is to CHOOSE TO REMAIN ON THE FENCE!

Now here's the thing: Fence-Sitters sit astride the FENCE; THE FENCE WHICH REPRESENTS THE point of DEMARCATION of two distinct sides. McCain represented and continues to represent Fascism... Hussein MArxism... and while it is true that BOTH represent Socialism, The choice between a fascist and a marxist is hardly debatable, let alone indistinguishable... While a fascist is a leftist and a marxist is a leftist, the fascist is the only choice which can be made by an advocate of freedom WHEN THE CHOICE IS LIMITED TO ONE OF THE TWO.

A Fence-Sitter is one who SITS ON THE FENCE BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO MAKE A CHOICE... You REFUSED TO MAKE A CHOICE; that is what YOU have stated... DEFINING YOURSELF AS THAT WHICH YOU LAMENT.

Now, I have never voted for anyone because of their party affiliation... and I've never made any statement anywhere, which could lead ANY REASONABLY intelligent individual to conclude that such is the case... Thus your position that I vote based upon party is, as is typical of you: BASELESS, meaning it is a projection which is made without a FACTUAL BASIS: A deception; a LIE... which is indicative of you being a lair, or, assuming you deny that you intended to decieve, its indicative you being a fool...

Uh oh! A fool or a liar? Now I can just imagine the angst that this decision will bring a fence-sitter... Just take your time and work it out as best ya can...

 

[KittenKoder]

A lot of words to say something very stupid.

Independents are not fence sitters, again, use more than just the one brain cell left in your puny head once in awhile. Not going to explain it all over again.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

A lot of words to say something very stupid.

Independents are not fence sitters, again, use more than just the one brain cell left in your puny head once in awhile. Not going to explain it all over again.

There's nothing independnet about you... you're an athiest who likes to pretend that atheism has some means to connect to sound reasoning; thus your most closely held beliefs adhere to that which you otherwise indicate that you stand against.

Atheism rests in Left-think... You will always, as all atheists MUST, return home to your ideological mother, which is secularism and secularism rejects the principles on which freedom rest. You like to think of yourself as an enigma, independent of the traditional reasoning. You're a child of the left and you'll never stray far from Momma.

Had you voted, you would have voted for Hussein... You didn't vote because you COULD NOT MAKE A CHOICE between the 'moderate' leftism advanced by McCain and the radical leftism advanced by Hussein; and this is born out in your stated denigration of PALIN...

I voted for PALIN... who happened to be the only American running; Palin represented the best chance to advance policy which defends the bed-rock principles on which America rests.

See the problem ya have here? You CLAIM to be an 'independent', while you CLEARLY oppossed PALIN who represented the only discernable distinction between the two Presidential Candidates... THUS you CHOSE to NOT VOTE FOR McCAIN, AS YOU'VE STATED: BECAUSE HE CHOSE PALIN AS HE VP... You made a choice sis... you CHOSE TO SIT ON THE FENCE AND NOT VOTE; and in so doing to lend the advantage, to the dgree that you were able, TO THE HARDCORE SECULAR LEFT.

Now my gut tells me that you did vote and that ya voted for Hussein... but that's conjecture based upon the information garnered from your writing here on this board; a judgment call which I advance as nothing beyond my own personal opinion.

You've not explained it at all, so 'again' is hardly even possible, let alone something you're choosing to avoid repeating. You're CHOOSING, to AVOID EXPLAINING IT AT ALL; and this is because there is no means TO EXPLAIN IT. The very NOTION of an independent is to say that one is tolerant of good ideas and bad ideas and not tied to any basis in reasoning which requires BAD IDEAS be REJECTED.

There is NO IDEA, born of LEFT-THINK which can inevitably SERVE GOOD. NONE... NADA... ZILCH... PERIOD... And as always, you're encouraged to produce a valid contest which would show SOME IDEA or another which is born of Left-think that you 'feel' must inevitably result in GOOD. Which you'll of course fail to do, while projecting some rationalization that ya already have, or that the unstated evidence is overwhelming, or some other 'everyone knows' ad populum farce...

 

[KittenKoder]

Pubicus ... you may enjoy being a mindless drone, but stop trying to insult us who like to think for ourselves. Seriously, all you are doing is making yourself look like a fool, considering I started this thread by saying Obama was only voted in because of his pop culture style, and yet you still have to find some lame excuse or completely fabricate one to attack someone just because they don't agree with you on many of your very corrupt ideals.

 

[Truthmatters]

Not a single "American" voted for Senator Hussein... the next one term Democrat Presidential failure.

Ok this guy is a real tainwallow who has no idea what this country is all about.

 

[Yukon]

PubicHairus,

Your post is an expression of your foolishness. Surely, my son, you jest ?

 

[Yukon]

Kitty,

You never fail to amuse me. Chronic PMS !

Pubicus ...(you mean PUBICHAIRUS) you may enjoy being a mindless drone (the pot calls the kettle black), but stop trying to insult us who like to think for ourselves (paradox) . Seriously, all you are doing is making yourself look like a fool, considering I started this thread by saying Obama was only voted in because of his pop culture style (I thought it was because he is half-black), and yet you still have to find some lame excuse or completely fabricate one to attack someone just because they don't agree with you on many of your very corrupt ideals (this coming from a fan of the convicted drug felon Rush Limpdick).

 

[KittenKoder]

Kitty,

You never fail to amuse me. Chronic PMS !

Pubicus ...(you mean PUBICHAIRUS) you may enjoy being a mindless drone (the pot calls the kettle black), but stop trying to insult us who like to think for ourselves (paradox) . Seriously, all you are doing is making yourself look like a fool, considering I started this thread by saying Obama was only voted in because of his pop culture style (I thought it was because he is half-black), and yet you still have to find some lame excuse or completely fabricate one to attack someone just because they don't agree with you on many of your very corrupt ideals (this coming from a fan of the convicted drug felon Rush Limpdick).

LOL ... hmm ... what errors to point out ... well, let's hit them all.

Not a Republican and don't always vote Democrat.
Not conservative, and only more liberal than conservative (liberals like Yukon make me ashamed to even mention that).
I actually hate Rush ... just because I think he's obnoxious more than anything so I never listen to him.
Also I never attack anyone for disagreeing with me, just for disagreeing with me for all the wrong reasons.
Hmm ... did I miss any ... anyone?

 

[xotoxi]

Does Pubeless Infantilium have a clue?

It seems as if he is of the opinion that the only person that is worthy of being president is someone that he himself appoints.

But who is that individual?

Scrotus Maximus? Succubus Penis Gargantuus? Anus Shitticus?

 

[KittenKoder]

Does Pubeless Infantilium have a clue?

It seems as if he is of the opinion that the only person that is worthy of being president is someone that he himself appoints.

But who is that individual?

Scrotus Maximus? Succubus Penis Gargantuus? Anus Shitticus?

I honestly think he's Rush's publicist ... has to be, no one else would ever avoid admitting when he's wrong more, except maybe Rush himself, or Obama.

I know, enough about Rush ... but me ... it's fun to torment morons like Pubicus and Yukon by insulting both Rush AND Obama at the same time ...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Does Pubeless Infantilium have a clue?

It seems as if he is of the opinion that the only person that is worthy of being president is someone that he himself appoints.

But who is that individual?

Scrotus Maximus? Succubus Penis Gargantuus? Anus Shitticus?

Hey, is this my Aggie-pal?

Before I forget, let me wish you wish you a great AGGIE-COLLEGE DAY...it's the first of next month, right?