No it doesn't damn you are stupid. Short term capital gains would be 12%, long term capital gains would be 0% but only up to about $70k anything over that and you have to pay tax on the gain. Neither has anything to do with the federal income tax standard deduction. If you live in liberal California well your screwed go look up their whopping 13% capital gain tax that's on top of the federal tax.
Please.
If my only income is Long term capital gains, can I claim deductions against it?
Yes, you can claim all allowable deductions, such as your Exemption and your Standard Deduction (or Itemized Deductions).
If my only income is Long term capital gains, can I claim deduct... - TurboTax Support
In this case the tax would be zero. So, if they had a 401K you claim the effective tax rate on that sixty grand withdrawal would be six percent. But, if they would have had long term capital gain instead the effective tax rate would be zero. And zero is less than six percent. Capital gains are almost always taxed lower than income. That is a problem, and even Ronald Reagan was opposed to such ignorance.

and
Typical right wing behavior. Knee jerk reaction, smart ass comment, proven totally wrong, attempt to deflect, and never, ever, under any circumstances admit you were wrong. Again, long term capital gains tax rates are almost always lower. For a married couple taxes on capital gains don't even start until $77,200. Yet if that couple were out working they would have to start paying taxes after the first $13,350.
Just assume I'm right and you are wrong. For example, do you know what the new standard deduction is for a married couple? The answer is no you do not. Here this is for you
Doubling down on stupid I see. Of course I know what the new standard deduction is stupid shit. Do you know what the new personal exemption is? And your calculations on the sixty grand couple were wrong. They would have to pay $5,225.25. But if the sixty grand would have been long term capital gains they would have paid ZERO. Not only that, they could have had a hundred grand in capital gains and paid ZERO in taxes.
Think about that for a moment. You have one couple, retired in Florida, that take capital gains each year that are equivalent to $8,000 a month. They have a 401K but since they are under 70 and a half and their financial consultant sucks ass, well they just continue to let it grow.
Then you have another couple, worked hard all their life and manage to build a little 401K. They draw five grand a month, three grand less than the other couple. But they have to set aside over four hundred dollars a month to pay taxes. In what damn world does that seem appropriate?