flacaltenn
Diamond Member
I'm not going to move my production to near-full-employment America just because I've got a tax liability reduction.
Then you're literally an economics moron. Couple that with regulation reduction and if you DON'T build modern facilities, an intact DOMESTIC supply chain back home here where your Intel Property won't be STOLEN and your manufacturing held captive overseas -- you're simply doomed.
Doesn't MATTER if shift other tax savings to the VITAL projects with other tax reductions attached. That's just SUPERB business practice. But of course, YOU don't recognize that. Because you've never invested in understanding how free markets and Capitalism actually work.
wtf does regulation reduction have to do with tax-cuts? Is one somehow hinged on the other? Why do you keep conflating and mixing in irrevancies?
You've got a total A.D.D. whirlwind in your head.
You need BOTH to interest ANYONE in business to bring it back home. One without the other is useless.. If you understood free market capitalism -- you'd KNOW this. But apparently you dont. Some of the THOUSANDS of regulations booked every year just promotes MEGA MULTI-NATIONALS who can HAVE big legal bills and an army of government lobbyists. Mom and Pop main Street can't compete. The regulation burden does virtually NOTHING but shut out new small start-ups and Main Street entreprenuers..
You could see that after the 2008 "Internet Collapse".. For 8 years FOLLOWING that collapse, with all the added regulation, we experienced the LOWEST NUMBER of stocks going public in our lifetimes. NEW competition virtually stalled out..
Corporate-Government collusion is a mighty large part of PERVERTING free markets. And the Jolly Green Giant gets to dictates the FEDERAL DEFINITION of an acceptable "frozen green pea". Or Tyson gets to dictate the FEDERAL DEFINITION of any "white meat chicken" product that contains stuff OTHER THAN "white meat chicken"...
Last edited: