One reason the supposed Russian hacking to influence the election is a false narrative.

[frigidweirdo]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

You can probably find the actual debate confrontation on You Tube when democrat Obama reminded republican candidate Romney that the Cold War has been over for decades and Russia was our Ally and friend. All of a sudden the democrat Hussein administration claims that Russia was responsible for democrat Hilly Clinton's defeat. No wonder we couldn't trust anything the hypocrite Obama administration and the crooked mainstream media said during the campaign.

Its the only narrative the libs and establishment republicans have left in an attempt to install their anointed one. Its Clinton's destiny to be the first female president fuck all else including reason.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

Politicians and a civilian population tend to get in the way of warfare. Run a war like we did in WWII and no country on Earth could stand against us.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Stand up to Putin for what? Both the FBI and the ODNI say there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations, and to prove they have no proof, the CIA is refusing to testify before Congress. This whole thing appears to be just a fake news story planted by the Obama administration.

Spies do not come out into the open.

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

Spies are not in the business of providing secret information to members of the public or exposing their personnel or methods.

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

The CIA is not in the business of proving the veracity of their reports. They are secret agents.

lol No, they are required by law to report to Congress. However, both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations about Russia trying to influence the election.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Donald Trump's campaign slogan "Make America Great again" also applied to the US Military.

“We will completely rebuild our depleted military, and the countries that we protect, at a massive cost to us, will be asked to pay their fair share.”

A stronger US military is not something Russia would actively encourage.

No, the ONE reason is you rightwing nuts are now writing your own version of the truth in a manner that exceeds all of your past ventures into that realm.

You warn mongering idiots are risking war with Russia over a supposed email hack. You people told us Trump was the crazy one WTF.

So your position is that in order to avoid standing up to Russia we should just let Putin run our elections.

Awesome.

Stand up to Putin for what? Both the FBI and the ODNI say there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations, and to prove they have no proof, the CIA is refusing to testify before Congress. This whole thing appears to be just a fake news story planted by the Obama administration.

You lie.

lol We both know it's true, but you don't like to admit it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

Politicians and a civilian population tend to get in the way of warfare. Run a war like we did in WWII and no country on Earth could stand against us.

Well, A) there are politicians and there are civilians. B) a war like WW2 won't happen, there are nukes, C) you underestimate the Chinese.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Stand up to Putin for what? Both the FBI and the ODNI say there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations, and to prove they have no proof, the CIA is refusing to testify before Congress. This whole thing appears to be just a fake news story planted by the Obama administration.

Spies do not come out into the open.

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

Spies are not in the business of providing secret information to members of the public or exposing their personnel or methods.

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

 

[toomuchtime_]

You warn mongering idiots are risking war with Russia over a supposed email hack. You people told us Trump was the crazy one WTF.

So your position is that in order to avoid standing up to Russia we should just let Putin run our elections.

Awesome.

Stand up to Putin for what? Both the FBI and the ODNI say there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations, and to prove they have no proof, the CIA is refusing to testify before Congress. This whole thing appears to be just a fake news story planted by the Obama administration.

Spies do not come out into the open.

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

How would you know they have no proof?

Just how stupid and ignorant are you? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof.

 

[keepitreal]

DailyMail:
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'

He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
“I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'

WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Spies do not come out into the open.

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

Spies are not in the business of providing secret information to members of the public or exposing their personnel or methods.

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

 

[frigidweirdo]

DailyMail:
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'

He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
“I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'

WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

Why would she say anything?

 

[keepitreal]

DailyMail:
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'

He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
“I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'

WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

Why would she say anything?

Why would she say anything?

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

 

[frigidweirdo]

DailyMail:
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'

He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
“I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'

WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

Why would she say anything?

Why would she say anything?

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

 

[keepitreal]

DailyMail:
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'

He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
“I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'

WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

Why would she say anything?

Why would she say anything?

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

We're not talking about Trump, we're talking about Hillary.

Why would she be more concerned about Trump
Voters wanted her to address the issue, I wanted her to

 

[Care4all]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

That's how we build and equip our Military....to fight the big ones with nuke capabilities, like china and russia...

We have no idea what we are doing or how to supply and stock our Military for jungle warfare or terrorist tactics....

 

[frigidweirdo]

DailyMail:
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'

He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
“I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'

WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Hillary Clinton emails | Daily Mail Online

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

Why would she say anything?

Why would she say anything?

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

We're not talking about Trump, we're talking about Hillary.

Why would she be more concerned about Trump
Voters wanted her to address the issue, I wanted her to

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

That's how we build and equip our Military....to fight the big ones with nuke capabilities, like china and russia...

We have no idea what we are doing or how to supply and stock our Military for jungle warfare or terrorist tactics....

Right... you think you can stop nukes.... er.... and spending in Vietnam reached record levels, and yet still no victory.

Why do you want war? It's ridiculous in the first place, and second thinking you can actually do it is even more ridiculous. Look, The USSR had a population much smaller than China's, and the US didn't dare attack the USSR. It was all about proxy wars, and this is the future. Small countries getting fucked right over because they happen to be in the middle of the Superpowers's games.

 

[Care4all]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

That's how we build and equip our Military....to fight the big ones with nuke capabilities, like china and russia...

We have no idea what we are doing or how to supply and stock our Military for jungle warfare or terrorist tactics....

Right... you think you can stop nukes.... er.... and spending in Vietnam reached record levels, and yet still no victory.

Why do you want war? It's ridiculous in the first place, and second thinking you can actually do it is even more ridiculous. Look, The USSR had a population much smaller than China's, and the US didn't dare attack the USSR. It was all about proxy wars, and this is the future. Small countries getting fucked right over because they happen to be in the middle of the Superpowers's games.

I don't want war...No one wants war....we just seem to stock up and arm our Military as if we do want a conventional war, only to hopefully, never have to use it!

 

[keepitreal]

You know what's fucked up?
Caring more about who brought the emails to light,
then what is contained in the damaging emails.

Hillary has never denied their authenticity that I'm aware of.
Frankly, she's avoided addressing them all together.

Being pissed because her dirt was dug up says alot.

Why would she say anything?

Why would she say anything?

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

We're not talking about Trump, we're talking about Hillary.

Why would she be more concerned about Trump
Voters wanted her to address the issue, I wanted her to

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

And Trump was taking a lot of crap...
He's still taking a lot of crap and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Both of them were talking crap and this is nothing new.
Her and Bernie were talking crap about each other,
as well as, her and Obama, again, nothing new.

If he's talking crap... whatever it may be,
Her position, I would think, would be to
address, defend, acknowledge or explain her position.

You do not let someone talk for you

 

[frigidweirdo]

Why would she say anything?

Why would she say anything?

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

We're not talking about Trump, we're talking about Hillary.

Why would she be more concerned about Trump
Voters wanted her to address the issue, I wanted her to

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

And Trump was taking a lot of crap...
He's still taking a lot of crap and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Both of them were talking crap and this is nothing new.
Her and Bernie were talking crap about each other,
as well as, her and Obama, again, nothing new.

If he's talking crap... whatever it may be,
Her position, I would think, would be to
address, defend, acknowledge or explain her position.

You do not let someone talk for you

Or you don't let someone dictate how things are going to be.