One reason the supposed Russian hacking to influence the election is a false narrative.

[Pumpkin Row]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

Not possible...

Obama already did it, and you can't gut something twice.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

And yet couldn't beat Vietnam. Couldn't control Iraq very well, couldn't control Afghanistan, and you think the US can take on two countries with nukes.... er.....

That's how we build and equip our Military....to fight the big ones with nuke capabilities, like china and russia...

We have no idea what we are doing or how to supply and stock our Military for jungle warfare or terrorist tactics....

Right... you think you can stop nukes.... er.... and spending in Vietnam reached record levels, and yet still no victory.

Why do you want war? It's ridiculous in the first place, and second thinking you can actually do it is even more ridiculous. Look, The USSR had a population much smaller than China's, and the US didn't dare attack the USSR. It was all about proxy wars, and this is the future. Small countries getting fucked right over because they happen to be in the middle of the Superpowers's games.

I don't want war...No one wants war....we just seem to stock up and arm our Military as if we do want a conventional war, only to hopefully, never have to use it!

Just get nukes. Then you had MAD.

 

[keepitreal]

I said she hasn't addressed the emails...
I didn't say she didn't say anything.

Saying nothing says alot!

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

We're not talking about Trump, we're talking about Hillary.

Why would she be more concerned about Trump
Voters wanted her to address the issue, I wanted her to

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

And Trump was taking a lot of crap...
He's still taking a lot of crap and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Both of them were talking crap and this is nothing new.
Her and Bernie were talking crap about each other,
as well as, her and Obama, again, nothing new.

If he's talking crap... whatever it may be,
Her position, I would think, would be to
address, defend, acknowledge or explain her position.

You do not let someone talk for you

Or you don't let someone dictate how things are going to be.

Or you don't let someone dictate how things are going to be.

OK then, she didn't address the emails,
she let voters draw their own conclusions
and lost the election....boy, she sure showed Trump, didn't she

 

[Eloy]

So your position is that in order to avoid standing up to Russia we should just let Putin run our elections.

Awesome.

Stand up to Putin for what? Both the FBI and the ODNI say there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations, and to prove they have no proof, the CIA is refusing to testify before Congress. This whole thing appears to be just a fake news story planted by the Obama administration.

Spies do not come out into the open.

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

How would you know they have no proof?

Just how stupid and ignorant are you? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof.

This shows how little the FBI knows.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

Not possible...

Obama already did it, and you can't gut something twice.

You lie.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

Yeah, perhaps it says she didn't want the election to always be about what Trump wanted to talk about. Trump didn't release his tax returns, says a lot?

We're not talking about Trump, we're talking about Hillary.

Why would she be more concerned about Trump
Voters wanted her to address the issue, I wanted her to

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

Because Trump was talking a lot of crap and the media was loving it and spreading the crap all over the place.

And Trump was taking a lot of crap...
He's still taking a lot of crap and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Both of them were talking crap and this is nothing new.
Her and Bernie were talking crap about each other,
as well as, her and Obama, again, nothing new.

If he's talking crap... whatever it may be,
Her position, I would think, would be to
address, defend, acknowledge or explain her position.

You do not let someone talk for you

Or you don't let someone dictate how things are going to be.

Or you don't let someone dictate how things are going to be.

OK then, she didn't address the emails,
she let voters draw their own conclusions
and lost the election....boy, she sure showed Trump, didn't she

And had she played to every Trump tune, she might have lost by more.

 

[toomuchtime_]

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

Spies are not in the business of providing secret information to members of the public or exposing their personnel or methods.

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Stand up to Putin for what? Both the FBI and the ODNI say there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations, and to prove they have no proof, the CIA is refusing to testify before Congress. This whole thing appears to be just a fake news story planted by the Obama administration.

Spies do not come out into the open.

So you are agreeing the CIA has no proof to back up its allegations Russia tried to influence the election.

How would you know they have no proof?

Just how stupid and ignorant are you? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof.

This shows how little the FBI knows.

This shows how little you know. The CIA operates as a part of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI, and James Clapper the DNI, has said there is no proof that Russia tried to influence the election.

 

[Eloy]

Spies are not in the business of providing secret information to members of the public or exposing their personnel or methods.

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

Actually, you haven't heard anything from the CIA. What you have heard are second and third hand accounts from politicians and anonymous sources. The FBI and ODNI, under which the CIA operates, who have access to the CIA intel, believe there is no proof to support the CIA's alleged allegations.

 

[Eloy]

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

Actually, you haven't heard anything from the CIA. What you have heard are second and third hand accounts from politicians and anonymous sources. The FBI and ODNI, under which the CIA operates, who have access to the CIA intel, believe there is no proof to support the CIA's alleged allegations.

The President of the United States disagrees with you.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

Actually, you haven't heard anything from the CIA. What you have heard are second and third hand accounts from politicians and anonymous sources. The FBI and ODNI, under which the CIA operates, who have access to the CIA intel, believe there is no proof to support the CIA's alleged allegations.

The President of the United States disagrees with you.

The next president of the United States does.

 

[Eloy]

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

Actually, you haven't heard anything from the CIA. What you have heard are second and third hand accounts from politicians and anonymous sources. The FBI and ODNI, under which the CIA operates, who have access to the CIA intel, believe there is no proof to support the CIA's alleged allegations.

The President of the United States disagrees with you.

The next president of the United States does.

No one knows what the minority president-elect believes, not even him.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

Actually, you haven't heard anything from the CIA. What you have heard are second and third hand accounts from politicians and anonymous sources. The FBI and ODNI, under which the CIA operates, who have access to the CIA intel, believe there is no proof to support the CIA's alleged allegations.

The President of the United States disagrees with you.

The next president of the United States does.

No one knows what the minority president-elect believes, not even him.

Apparently you don't know, but anyone who has been paying attention to the news knows.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Spies are not in the business of providing secret information to members of the public or exposing their personnel or methods.

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

You don't know that. One thing is proof, another is proof they're willing to give and jeopardize their sources.

 

[owebo]

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

I believe the CIA.

Your Obama said today in his news conference that the Russians did not hack the election...so.....

 

[toomuchtime_]

The bottom line remains there is no proof to support the CIA's allegations that Russia attempted to influence the election.

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

You don't know that. One thing is proof, another is proof they're willing to give and jeopardize their sources.

The ODNI said there was no proof.

 

[Contumacious]

Trump abandoning the eastern European nations of NATO as he has suggested would make Putin turn back-flips in joy.

Yo dingleberry

Are you aware that the US is BANKRUPT?

That we are not yet completely out of the 2008 depression.

Shut the fuck up.


.


.

 

[Contumacious]

Our military is quite capable of taking out both China and Russia NOW.

Trump will gut the military.

I wish that DJT will gut the military.

After all the Founding Fathers did not want standing armies.

.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You're in the CIA? or have a clearance and the need to know?

Why keep up this stupid pretense? Both the FBI and the ODNI have said there is no proof to support the CIA's allegation that Russia tried to influence the election.

FBI is internal, CIA is external, perhaps the CIA have intelligence that they can't reveal now. Perhaps they made it up. The simple answer is you don't know.

The CIA is under the ODNI and James Clapper, the DNI, has there is no proof Russia tried to influence the election.

You don't know that. One thing is proof, another is proof they're willing to give and jeopardize their sources.

The ODNI said there was no proof.

Where did they say this?