- Thread starter
- #81
But you can’t prove it. I have proven Trump’s lies!What you call the truth is mostly lib lies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you can’t prove it. I have proven Trump’s lies!What you call the truth is mostly lib lies
You have proven nothing. I have proven that you can’t even dispute 47 complaintslol...I am asking you to produce a list of liberal whining
it's actually direct and goes to the crux of your post, that said, asking for a list of white liberal complaints is akin to asking you to give me the highest number you can think of...try it
If there are ONLY 47 complaints, isn’t that enough to prove the point? You are the one that came up with a higher number!Sure, I proudly accept that description, but then I wasn't the one who quit at 47 so why wouldn't I?
Well I am certainly trying to tame the ignorance by demanding the rest of the list, you know cuz that is ignorance...now get hot on that list buddy
I dont have to prove anything to youBut you can’t prove it. I have proven Trump’s lies!
Sure, but it is hard to give you a complete list because there are so many. Here is a small list with 47 things:
Here are 47 ways he has broken his promises and made your life worse
I'm not sure "mean" really captures the focus of the criticism. More like signs of emotional instability and psychological defect. More like reckless, factually inaccurate, and disturbingly detached from reality.When they say that some of his tweets are mean, I have to agree that some of them are.
I think he should receive the same consequence as everyone else does when they tweet mean tweets.
play by your own rules luckyIf there are ONLY 47 complaints, isn’t that enough to prove the point? You are the one that came up with a higher number!
even if true, why would either of us be trying to dispute anything when the objective is to find one that may be true, and how does one do that without all of the factors...is it really that daunting of a task to list all the liberal whining and gripes?You have proven nothing. I have proven that you can’t even dispute 47 complaints
Trump did it on his ownThe Democrats had to make up scandals about Trump.
They all fell apart as the Bidens showed us what real family of addicts degenerates and felons really are.Trump did it on his own
Democrats held him accountable
Making up scandals isn’t holding anyone accountable…it’s literally the opposite, it’s deflectionTrump did it on his own
Democrats held him accountable
They were realMaking up scandals isn’t holding anyone accountable…it’s literally the opposite, it’s deflection
They fell apart because Trump was elected President not because he was innocentThey all fell apart as the Bidens showed us what real family of addicts degenerates and felons really are.
How would you put it then? "Meaner than mean?" "Very mean?"I'm not sure "mean" really captures the focus of the criticism.
Uh-huh.More like signs of emotional instability and psychological defect. More like reckless, factually inaccurate, and disturbingly detached from reality.
The word you are looking for is "iconoclast."Despite that, when the POTUS posts a picture like this......
View attachment 1257659
and says “I thought it was me as a doctor,” you think it should be treated the same as everyone else.
View attachment 1257664
Patterns of behavior are always a means to decide something. If a man has been found to be drunk 47 times before, the chances of him being drunk the next 47 (or the next 1000) goes through the roofeven if true, why would either of us be trying to dispute anything when the objective is to find one that may be true, and how does one do that without all of the factors...is it really that daunting of a task to list all the liberal whining and gripes?
Patterns of behavior are used by prosecutors in the courts consistently. Not my rules aloneplay by your own rules lucky
What is the % of murders committed in Fairfax County VA committed since 2020 are by illegal aliens?/—-/ “Trump has done “nothing” to be blamed for”
That still doesn’t make any sense. I had to ask Gemini to clarify it:
From a communication standpoint, this phrase is a classic example of syntactic and semantic ambiguity. It stalls clear communication because the brain has to work overtime to figure out which of two completely opposite meanings the speaker intends.
Here is a breakdown of why this specific formulation causes confusion:
1. The Double-Negative Trap
In formal English, two negatives cancel each other out and create a positive.
• The literal/formal interpretation: If he has done nothing to be blamed for, it means he is entirely innocent. He is free of blame.
• The colloquial/idiomatic interpretation: In casual, spoken English, people frequently use double negatives for emphasis rather than cancellation (e.g., "I ain't done nothing"). If interpreted this way, a listener might think the speaker is trying to say, "Trump has done nothing [good], and is to be blamed for [everything]."
Because the sentence sits right on the edge of these two grammatical habits, the listener is left guessing.
2. Misplaced Linguistic Focus
The confusion also stems from where the emphasis naturally falls.
• If you place the emphasis on "nothing" ("Trump has done NOTHING to be blamed for"), it functions as a defense of his actions.
• If a reader glances at the words "nothing" and "blamed" in close proximity, the brain automatically associates the sentence with negativity and fault, muddying the waters if the intent was actually a compliment.
How to Fix It (Clearing the Ambiguity)
To ensure the message is delivered without a speedbump, a communication expert would advise rewriting the sentence based on the actual intent:
Of course you don’t, but there are always benefits “and consequences” to every decision. In this case, the consequences to you is that you look biased, ignorant, à liar in your statements, à Trump cult member, and someone not worth debating with or even talking to, to all people (not just me)! It is your decision, of course!I dont have to prove anything to you
In other words he is a spoiled child and bully incapable of controlling himselfn other words, he uses hyperbole and name calling for comic effect and people with deep insecurities and no sense of humor or self-awareness get angry.