One question for Trump supporters

lol...I am asking you to produce a list of liberal whining :abgg2q.jpg:

it's actually direct and goes to the crux of your post, that said, asking for a list of white liberal complaints is akin to asking you to give me the highest number you can think of...try it
You have proven nothing. I have proven that you can’t even dispute 47 complaints
 
Sure, I proudly accept that description, but then I wasn't the one who quit at 47 so why wouldn't I?

Well I am certainly trying to tame the ignorance by demanding the rest of the list, you know cuz that is ignorance...now get hot on that list buddy
If there are ONLY 47 complaints, isn’t that enough to prove the point? You are the one that came up with a higher number!
 
When they say that some of his tweets are mean, I have to agree that some of them are.

I think he should receive the same consequence as everyone else does when they tweet mean tweets.
I'm not sure "mean" really captures the focus of the criticism. More like signs of emotional instability and psychological defect. More like reckless, factually inaccurate, and disturbingly detached from reality.

Despite that, when the POTUS posts a picture like this......

1779020475108.webp

and says “I thought it was me as a doctor,” you think it should be treated the same as everyone else.

1779020745132.webp
 
You have proven nothing. I have proven that you can’t even dispute 47 complaints
even if true, why would either of us be trying to dispute anything when the objective is to find one that may be true, and how does one do that without all of the factors...is it really that daunting of a task to list all the liberal whining and gripes?
 
Making up scandals isn’t holding anyone accountable…it’s literally the opposite, it’s deflection
They were real
Every one a result of Trumps poor decisions

Care to talk about any that were not?
 
They all fell apart as the Bidens showed us what real family of addicts degenerates and felons really are.
They fell apart because Trump was elected President not because he was innocent
 
I'm not sure "mean" really captures the focus of the criticism.
How would you put it then? "Meaner than mean?" "Very mean?"

Okay, I agree that his tweets are sometimes very mean. But usually humorous and troll-like.
More like signs of emotional instability and psychological defect. More like reckless, factually inaccurate, and disturbingly detached from reality.
Uh-huh.

In other words, he uses hyperbole and name calling for comic effect and people with deep insecurities and no sense of humor or self-awareness get angry.
Despite that, when the POTUS posts a picture like this......

View attachment 1257659
and says “I thought it was me as a doctor,” you think it should be treated the same as everyone else.

View attachment 1257664
The word you are looking for is "iconoclast."
 
even if true, why would either of us be trying to dispute anything when the objective is to find one that may be true, and how does one do that without all of the factors...is it really that daunting of a task to list all the liberal whining and gripes?
Patterns of behavior are always a means to decide something. If a man has been found to be drunk 47 times before, the chances of him being drunk the next 47 (or the next 1000) goes through the roof
 
15th post
/—-/ “Trump has done “nothing” to be blamed for”
That still doesn’t make any sense. I had to ask Gemini to clarify it:
From a communication standpoint, this phrase is a classic example of syntactic and semantic ambiguity. It stalls clear communication because the brain has to work overtime to figure out which of two completely opposite meanings the speaker intends.

Here is a breakdown of why this specific formulation causes confusion:

1. The Double-Negative Trap

In formal English, two negatives cancel each other out and create a positive.

• The literal/formal interpretation: If he has done nothing to be blamed for, it means he is entirely innocent. He is free of blame.

• The colloquial/idiomatic interpretation: In casual, spoken English, people frequently use double negatives for emphasis rather than cancellation (e.g., "I ain't done nothing"). If interpreted this way, a listener might think the speaker is trying to say, "Trump has done nothing [good], and is to be blamed for [everything]."

Because the sentence sits right on the edge of these two grammatical habits, the listener is left guessing.

2. Misplaced Linguistic Focus

The confusion also stems from where the emphasis naturally falls.

• If you place the emphasis on "nothing" ("Trump has done NOTHING to be blamed for"), it functions as a defense of his actions.

• If a reader glances at the words "nothing" and "blamed" in close proximity, the brain automatically associates the sentence with negativity and fault, muddying the waters if the intent was actually a compliment.

How to Fix It (Clearing the Ambiguity)

To ensure the message is delivered without a speedbump, a communication expert would advise rewriting the sentence based on the actual intent:
What is the % of murders committed in Fairfax County VA committed since 2020 are by illegal aliens?

Short answer: There is no publicly available statistic showing what percentage of murders in Fairfax County, Virginia since 2020 were committed by undocumented immigrants.However, the best available reporting indicates that only a small number of murder cases involved undocumented suspects — not a majority, and not enough to calculate a meaningful percentage.

Below is what we can say from the sources found.

✅ What the available sources show (2020–2026)​

1. Fairfax County murder cases involving undocumented suspects (2020–2026)

From the search results:
  • 2024 Oakton murder: One suspect was an undocumented Honduran national (Guzman).
  • 2026 DHS statement: DHS cited three Fairfax County murder cases in 2026 involving undocumented suspects (Lopez Gomez, Chavarria Muy, Jalloh).
This gives us approximately 4 known cases involving undocumented suspects since 2020.

Cellblock is digging a trap for himself.
 
I dont have to prove anything to you
Of course you don’t, but there are always benefits “and consequences” to every decision. In this case, the consequences to you is that you look biased, ignorant, à liar in your statements, à Trump cult member, and someone not worth debating with or even talking to, to all people (not just me)! It is your decision, of course!
 
n other words, he uses hyperbole and name calling for comic effect and people with deep insecurities and no sense of humor or self-awareness get angry.
In other words he is a spoiled child and bully incapable of controlling himself
 
Back
Top Bottom