One of the unintended, or perhaps very much intended, consequences of the proposed Equality Act is scaring women and gays out of their wits!

[danielpalos]

You first have to understand the psychology of being ugly.

The ugly school girls who were jealous of the knockouts became the Mean Girl Libturd Dipshit Feminist.

So void of the sexual pleasures they desire, but have to settle for a derelict loser. Frumpy ugly bodies and fat asses

Feminism was part based for women who can't get dicked besides with an animal, so they could voice their anger and find a butch lesbo for some action in the process.

Is it any wonder why I have no problem practicing full body massage with Happy ending and g-spot focus work with women. It almost feels like a moral obligation.

 

[hadit]

Is it any wonder why I have no problem practicing full body massage with Happy ending and g-spot focus work with women. It almost feels like a moral obligation.

Except of course that they don't want you to do it.

 

[danielpalos]

Except of course that they don't want you to do it.

Some women seem to be brave when they are a thousand miles away.

 

[Iamartiewhitefox]

.
See: Abigail Shrier: Biden’s ‘Horrifying’ Equality Act Would Put Biological Males In All-Female Prisons

JUNE 3, 2021

”Biological males who identify as female could be allowed in all-women prisons across the nation if the Equality Act is passed and signed by President Joe Biden’s Democrat administration, “no hormones or surgery required.”

After talking to women already affected by California’s radical gender law, which is at risk of becoming national, Abigail Shrier, a journalist and author of “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters,” told The Federalist’s Ben Domenech on Fox News “Primetime” Monday evening that “these women are terrified.”

Also see: Why Democrats’ Equality Act Is Dangerous To Women, Children, And Gay People Like Me
FEBRUARY 22, 2021

”Congress appears to be heading full-steam ahead with the Equality Act, more accurately labeled the “Insanity Act.” As an out conservative gay man, I cannot in good conscience label this bill an “equality” act nor support it. This bill has nothing to do with actual equality for all.”

”The bill would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as federally protected classes, redefining the word “sex” in the original law to include these definitions. This sounds wonderful on the surface, but will lead to catastrophe.”

The article also lists some other consequences of the bill:

”Endanger women’s rights and put millions of women at risk for sexual assault;

Destroy women’s sports and harm men’s sports;

Put gender-confused children at extreme risk, with no alternate paths for them allowed besides cross-sex hormones and genital amputation;

Remove constitutional protections for religious beliefs and freedoms; and

Elevate LBGTQ rights and claims over religious citizens by mandating that an LGBTQ person’s claim wins by default in cases where there is a dispute between the two.”

In specific regard to the last frightening consequence of protected class legislation which the Equality Act is, it flings open the door for countless lawsuits by opportunists and activists, and would allow our bottom feeding scum sucking shyster lawyers to have a field day with the law, just as they did with the unconstitutional American’s with Disabilities Act:

See, e.g., Florida man sues dozens of Colorado businesses - KMGH-TV

Also see: Drive-By Lawsuits and the Abuse of the Americans with …

And especially see:

The ADA Litigation Monster | Americans with Disabilities Act

“The notion that the ADA would not “lead endlessly to litigation” was also wrong. (See “The ADA Shakedown Racket,” Winter 2004.) ADA claims against employers filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), now numbering more than 26,000 per year, have become as common as sex-discrimination claims. And the volume keeps rising, as does the number of ADA lawsuits against employers filed in federal court yearly.”

I caution the unsuspecting . . . be careful of what you ask for!

JWK

As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting victims of darkness.___Supreme Court Justice William Douglas

People can scare real, irrational Satan worshipers, had they see a nude female, not being married, or what they see as marrage, committing suicide. What a way to fight Islam. Get naked. That could be why the church calls the nude body not family friendly. That though is from the irrationally minded Satan.

 

[Dragonlady]

.
See: Abigail Shrier: Biden’s ‘Horrifying’ Equality Act Would Put Biological Males In All-Female Prisons

JUNE 3, 2021

”Biological males who identify as female could be allowed in all-women prisons across the nation if the Equality Act is passed and signed by President Joe Biden’s Democrat administration, “no hormones or surgery required.”

After talking to women already affected by California’s radical gender law, which is at risk of becoming national, Abigail Shrier, a journalist and author of “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters,” told The Federalist’s Ben Domenech on Fox News “Primetime” Monday evening that “these women are terrified.”

Also see: Why Democrats’ Equality Act Is Dangerous To Women, Children, And Gay People Like Me
FEBRUARY 22, 2021

”Congress appears to be heading full-steam ahead with the Equality Act, more accurately labeled the “Insanity Act.” As an out conservative gay man, I cannot in good conscience label this bill an “equality” act nor support it. This bill has nothing to do with actual equality for all.”

”The bill would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as federally protected classes, redefining the word “sex” in the original law to include these definitions. This sounds wonderful on the surface, but will lead to catastrophe.”

The article also lists some other consequences of the bill:

”Endanger women’s rights and put millions of women at risk for sexual assault;

Destroy women’s sports and harm men’s sports;

Put gender-confused children at extreme risk, with no alternate paths for them allowed besides cross-sex hormones and genital amputation;

Remove constitutional protections for religious beliefs and freedoms; and

Elevate LBGTQ rights and claims over religious citizens by mandating that an LGBTQ person’s claim wins by default in cases where there is a dispute between the two.”

In specific regard to the last frightening consequence of protected class legislation which the Equality Act is, it flings open the door for countless lawsuits by opportunists and activists, and would allow our bottom feeding scum sucking shyster lawyers to have a field day with the law, just as they did with the unconstitutional American’s with Disabilities Act:

See, e.g., Florida man sues dozens of Colorado businesses - KMGH-TV

Also see: Drive-By Lawsuits and the Abuse of the Americans with …

And especially see:

The ADA Litigation Monster | Americans with Disabilities Act

“The notion that the ADA would not “lead endlessly to litigation” was also wrong. (See “The ADA Shakedown Racket,” Winter 2004.) ADA claims against employers filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), now numbering more than 26,000 per year, have become as common as sex-discrimination claims. And the volume keeps rising, as does the number of ADA lawsuits against employers filed in federal court yearly.”

I caution the unsuspecting . . . be careful of what you ask for!

JWK

As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting victims of darkness.___Supreme Court Justice William Douglas

If it wasn't for Questionable Sources, Republicans wouldn't have sources.

It doesn't say much for your side of things that the only articles you can find to support your positions are found in lying, propaganda, and conspiracy theory websites.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

The Federalist - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[Dragonlady]

Equality Act would end many protections women now enjoy
.

The new Leadership of the Democrat Party no longer represents the interests of females. It does not acknowledge there are very real differences between males and females, and the consequences are very real!

See The Equality Act would lead to the death of women's rights

"The moment Selina Soule had waited for was finally here. She had trained hard, set goals, and persevered to reach this point: the Connecticut girls indoor track championships."

"Yet, instead of qualifying for the New England regionals in the 55-meter, Selina was outpaced by two biological boys."


The good news is, women can end this kind of insanity by carefully choosing who they elect this coming election.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to exercise legislative power proposed under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, the Act is an attempted usurpation of power not granted.

This is the same argument that the right used to vote against an Equal Rights Amendment to the USA Constitution which would make women and men equal. They told women that if they were to pass that Amendment, women would be subject to the military draft.

 

[hadit]

This is the same argument that the right used to vote against an Equal Rights Amendment to the USA Constitution which would make women and men equal. They told women that if they were to pass that Amendment, women would be subject to the military draft.

If you insist that women be treated in every way like men are treated, that there be no differences, that's what will happen. It would seem that what some people want is for women to be treated like men only in certain ways. Now, can you tell us how the US Constitution as currently written, makes men and women unequal?

 

[danielpalos]

If you insist that women be treated in every way like men are treated, that there be no differences, that's what will happen. It would seem that what some people want is for women to be treated like men only in certain ways. Now, can you tell us how the US Constitution as currently written, makes men and women unequal?

This is all anyone should be suggesting:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[Rogue AI]

The courts need to decide one way or the other. Trannies can't get special treatment that is only beneficial to them. There really is no middle ground, they can't be accepted as girls/boys on a case by case basis, they are or aren't in the eyes of the law.

 

[Dragonlady]

If you insist that women be treated in every way like men are treated, that there be no differences, that's what will happen. It would seem that what some people want is for women to be treated like men only in certain ways. Now, can you tell us how the US Constitution as currently written, makes men and women unequal?

What women want is to be treated as equals. Equal pay for the same work. Equal rights under the law. It shouldn't take 60 women coming forward saying they've been raped to get a conviction of one man.

It is inappropriate to treat women as men because we're not men. But it is also inappropriate to treatment men as more important, more believable, or more valuable than women.

Small examples exist everywhere on how women are disregarded, or held to differing standards. Women pay higher health care premiums, despite having lower wages than men. The excuse is that women use health care more than men because we have babies. Since having babies is necessary to the continuation of the species, we should not be economically penalized on account of a biological function which men also benefit from.

What is most odious is the notion that employers control what health care is covered in female employees' health insurance coverage, on "religious grounds". The health insurance is considered part of the worker's compensation package, therefore it is HER money, HER earnings and income that are paying for the coverage,, and it should be HER choice what is covered.

Now you're trying to strip women of the right to determine her own fate by forcing her to carry every pregnancy to term, no exceptions, while at the same time bleating endlessly about the horror of being "forced" to take a life saving vaccine. You're not being forced to spend the rest of your life parenting the vaccine, and covering it's food, clothing, education and health care. You claim that the gestating fetus has "rights", but the woman has none. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

 

[hadit]

What women want is to be treated as equals. Equal pay for the same work. Equal rights under the law. It shouldn't take 60 women coming forward saying they've been raped to get a conviction of one man.

It is inappropriate to treat women as men because we're not men. But it is also inappropriate to treatment men as more important, more believable, or more valuable than women.

Small examples exist everywhere on how women are disregarded, or held to differing standards. Women pay higher health care premiums, despite having lower wages than men. The excuse is that women use health care more than men because we have babies. Since having babies is necessary to the continuation of the species, we should not be economically penalized on account of a biological function which men also benefit from.

What is most odious is the notion that employers control what health care is covered in female employees' health insurance coverage, on "religious grounds". The health insurance is considered part of the worker's compensation package, therefore it is HER money, HER earnings and income that are paying for the coverage,, and it should be HER choice what is covered.

Now you're trying to strip women of the right to determine her own fate by forcing her to carry every pregnancy to term, no exceptions, while at the same time bleating endlessly about the horror of being "forced" to take a life saving vaccine. You're not being forced to spend the rest of your life parenting the vaccine, and covering it's food, clothing, education and health care. You claim that the gestating fetus has "rights", but the woman has none. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

So IOW, there is nothing in the US Constitution that makes and women unequal. Now that we've laid that one to rest, let's address your complaints that have nothing to do with the Constitution.

1. When corrected for variances such as time away from the job and comparing men and women in the same job, women are not paid significantly less than men are for doing the same job at the same performance. If they are unable to perform at the same level as men, they should not be paid as much. That's not even controversial.
2. Rape is a very serious charge and needs to be treated as such. In every other crime, we hold to the standard that a person is innocent until PROVEN guilty, yet when it comes to rape, a single unproven accusation from a woman is supposed to be sufficient to destroy a man's life (rape and sexual assault victims are to be believed, after all, unless they are victims of Bubba Clinton. Then they're trash), and that's not right. Rape needs to be investigated and prosecuted just like every other serious crime, and the accused has the same rights afforded to every, for example, accused murderer. Remember, it's nothing more than an accusation until guilt is proven.
3. Women pay higher healthcare premiums not only because they file childbirth claims (maybe it's time to reign in the high cost of malpractice insurance OBGYNs and labor and delivery doctors have to pay), but because they live longer and spend more time in the age group that files the vast majority of the claims. It's a matter of numbers. You might as well complain that women pay more than men do to get their hair cut. Guess what, they do.
4. When an employer buys a healthcare package for his employees, it is up to the employees to use that package or not. They cannot dictate to him that he has to buy a more expensive package that covers things he doesn't want to cover, nor can they dictate what the health insurance package must cover, period. They can take it or leave it and find something elsewhere that is more to their liking, or they can buy their own condoms. A lot of people do just that.
5. Please quote where I am "trying to strip women of the right to determine her own fate by forcing her to carry every pregnancy to term, no exceptions, while at the same time bleating endlessly about the horror of being "forced" to take a life saving vaccine". When you fail to do that, feel free to leave the sandbox.

 

[danielpalos]

What women want is to be treated as equals. Equal pay for the same work. Equal rights under the law. It shouldn't take 60 women coming forward saying they've been raped to get a conviction of one man.

It is inappropriate to treat women as men because we're not men. But it is also inappropriate to treatment men as more important, more believable, or more valuable than women.

Small examples exist everywhere on how women are disregarded, or held to differing standards. Women pay higher health care premiums, despite having lower wages than men. The excuse is that women use health care more than men because we have babies. Since having babies is necessary to the continuation of the species, we should not be economically penalized on account of a biological function which men also benefit from.

What is most odious is the notion that employers control what health care is covered in female employees' health insurance coverage, on "religious grounds". The health insurance is considered part of the worker's compensation package, therefore it is HER money, HER earnings and income that are paying for the coverage,, and it should be HER choice what is covered.

Now you're trying to strip women of the right to determine her own fate by forcing her to carry every pregnancy to term, no exceptions, while at the same time bleating endlessly about the horror of being "forced" to take a life saving vaccine. You're not being forced to spend the rest of your life parenting the vaccine, and covering it's food, clothing, education and health care. You claim that the gestating fetus has "rights", but the woman has none. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

This is why equal protection of the laws is important. Solving simple poverty can give us more metrics and metadata to work with for economic purposes.

 

[danielpalos]

So IOW, there is nothing in the US Constitution that makes and women unequal. Now that we've laid that one to rest, let's address your complaints that have nothing to do with the Constitution.

1. Rape is a very serious charge and needs to be treated as such. In every other crime, we hold to the standard that a person is innocent until PROVEN guilty, yet when it comes to rape, a single unproven accusation from a woman is supposed to be sufficient to destroy a man's life (rape and sexual assault victims are to be believed, after all, unless they are victims of Bubba Clinton. Then they're trash), and that's not right. Rape needs to be investigated and prosecuted just like every other serious crime, and the accused has the same rights afforded to every, for example, accused murderer. Remember, it's nothing more than an accusation until guilt is proven.
2. Women pay higher healthcare premiums not only because they file childbirth claims (maybe it's time to reign in the high cost of malpractice insurance OBGYNs and labor and delivery doctors have to pay), but because they live longer and spend more time in the age group that files the vast majority of the claims. It's a matter of numbers. You might as well complain that women pay more than men do to get their hair cut. Guess what, they do.
3. When an employer buys a healthcare package for his employees, it is up to the employees to use that package or not. They cannot dictate to him that he has to buy a more expensive package that covers things he doesn't want to cover, nor can they dictate what the health insurance package must cover, period. They can take it or leave it and find something elsewhere that is more to their liking, or they can buy their own condoms. A lot of people do just that.
4. Please quote where I am "trying to strip women of the right to determine her own fate by forcing her to carry every pregnancy to term, no exceptions, while at the same time bleating endlessly about the horror of being "forced" to take a life saving vaccine". When you fail to do that, feel free to leave the sandbox.

Right-wingers prefer to try to "criminalize poverty" and then "blame the Poor" for their problems.

 

[hadit]

Right-wingers prefer to try to "criminalize poverty" and then "blame the Poor" for their problems.

No, they do not. That's just another fairy tale you believe. And why do you even think that's germane to the topic at hand?

 

[hadit]

This is why equal protection of the laws is important. Solving simple poverty can give us more metrics and metadata to work with for economic purposes.

1. You're at it again with the myth you have created around Unemployment Compensation.
2. You're not going to solve simple poverty. Nothing you have advocated for will ever do that.

 

[danielpalos]

No, they do not. That's just another fairy tale you believe. And why do you even think that's germane to the topic at hand?

It is only fantasy to the economically ignorant right-wing. Typical.

 

[hadit]

It is only fantasy to the economically ignorant right-wing. Typical.

No, I checked. It's your fantasy.

 

[Dragonlady]

The courts need to decide one way or the other. Trannies can't get special treatment that is only beneficial to them. There really is no middle ground, they can't be accepted as girls/boys on a case by case basis, they are or aren't in the eyes of the law.

What "special treatment" are trannies asking for, other than to be treated with dignity and respect? Not to be beaten up, or attacked, and to use the washroom with privacy.

YOU'RE the ones are want to treat trannies differently than you would other people. You refuse to accept them for who they are, but rather you want them to conform to YOUR idea of who they should be. The only problem I see here is YOU.

Coming from the City, I see a lot of people who go there to "re-invent" themselves. Small towns put people into boxes, and that's who you are. Like the local lawyer here who was the skinny nerdy kid who got shoved into lockers a lot, when he was in high school. I met a guy who "went to school with him", and he was the school joke. Now he's the town joke. No matter how successful he became, he is still the skinny nerdy kid they used to shove into lockers.

In the city, we don't have time to obsess over other people's lives. We're accept people for who they are because who am I to judge who you choose to be. If you're not harming anyone or doing illegal shit, whatever floats your boat.

 

[Circe]

The good news is, women can end this kind of insanity by carefully choosing who they elect this coming election.

Yeah, and I'm sure not voting for someone who has a pile of freakazoids in his Cabinet.

 

[Circe]

YOU'RE the ones are want to treat trannies differently than you would other people. You refuse to accept them for who they are,

I accept them for what they are ---- psychotics, and fraudsters who are cheating girls out of sports trophies.