- Aug 6, 2012
- 28,326
- 25,099
- 2,405
I think someone alluded to the answer some time ago on here, apparently the State is protected. I ask the question again as it was in passing before. Can someone explain to me how and why there aren't lawsuits against the State for Sanctuary Cities that deny ICE access to someone illegally in your country, if, that person engages in a crime against another?
As I said, I think someone stated that the State is immune from prosecution. This seems extremely unusual, no?
Let's say a prison let a murderer out early and that person kills someone, shouldn't there be consequences for the prison? If a man is deported and sneaks in again on his own, you can't blame the border for not catching everyone. However, if such a person is shielded by the government when that person shouldn't be in the country?
Please someone explain this logic. If I am the cops or anyone else who is victimized, I want justice from those defending foreign Nationals who break U.S Federal Law.
As I said, I think someone stated that the State is immune from prosecution. This seems extremely unusual, no?
Let's say a prison let a murderer out early and that person kills someone, shouldn't there be consequences for the prison? If a man is deported and sneaks in again on his own, you can't blame the border for not catching everyone. However, if such a person is shielded by the government when that person shouldn't be in the country?
Please someone explain this logic. If I am the cops or anyone else who is victimized, I want justice from those defending foreign Nationals who break U.S Federal Law.