One of my undecided friend has came to a decision

Why is it necessary that someone watch the nonsense D'Souza thinks up? The man is a partisan wacko and is it really necessary to watch his crap to know it is crap? For the choir of course it makes sense, it doesn't matter what the truth is only that it is critical of Obama. PS I watched some of it on youtube and if you are so easily persuadable you have the mind and education of a child or a moron. Hopefully the former as you may grow up.

"D'Souza then goes through a list of actions Obama has taken as president to support his thesis. Many of them don't hold water:

_ D'Souza rightly argues that the national debt has risen to $16 trillion under Obama. But he never mentions the explosion of debt that occurred under Obama's predecessor, Republican George W. Bush, nor the 2008 global financial crisis that provoked a shock to the U.S. economy.

_ D'Souza says Obama is "weirdly sympathetic to Muslim jihadists" in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He does not mention that Obama ordered the raid that killed Osama bin Laden and the drone strikes that have killed dozens of other terrorists in the region.

_D'Souza wrongly claims that Obama wants to return control of the Falkland Islands from Britain to Argentina. The U.S. refused in April to endorse a final declaration on Argentina's claim to the islands at the Summit of the Americas, provoking criticism from other Latin American nations.

_D'Souza says Obama has "done nothing" to impede Iran's nuclear ambitions, despite the severe trade and economic sanctions his administration has imposed on that country to halt its suspected nuclear program. Obama opposes a near-term military strike on Iran, either by the U.S. or Israel, although he says the U.S. will never tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran.

_ D'Souza says Obama removed a bust of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill from the Oval Office because Churchill represented British colonialism. White House curator William Allman said the bust, which had been on loan, was already scheduled to be returned before Obama took office. Another bust of Churchill is on display in the president's private residence, the White House says." '2016: Obama's America' Fact-Check

"2016: Obama's America is a tempest in a Tea Party. Dinesh D'Souza's movie is a breathless attempt to find questions for the long since settled answers widely known by most of America. Dressed up to look serious, it is actually just one more attempt to define President Barack Obama as an outsider using red-baiting, fear mongering and intellectual dishonesty. The irony is that these contrivances are engineered by a filmmaker whose subjectivity and heterodox beliefs put him well outside fact and public opinion." Michael Berkowitz: '2016: Obama's America': Save Your Money, Use Your Vouchers
 
you're just mad Obama is losing.. Nov 6 cant come soon enough so we take our country back!!!

Where you going to take it back to?

The Bush years? Yeah, they were great.

From an economic standpoint, they were quite prosperous.

Gas was 1.50.....unemployment for most of his time was below 5%

He helped us recover from the dot com bubble bursting without us falling into a deep recession.

Sure....when conmgress had its turnover in 2006, shit started to happen....
but for the first 6 years, we had a pretty stable economy.
 
Why is it necessary that someone watch the nonsense D'Souza thinks up? The man is a partisan wacko and is it really necessary to watch his crap to know it is crap? For the choir of course it makes sense, it doesn't matter what the truth is only that it is critical of Obama. PS I watched some of it on youtube and if you are so easily persuadable you have the mind and education of a child or a moron. Hopefully the former as you may grow up.

"D'Souza then goes through a list of actions Obama has taken as president to support his thesis. Many of them don't hold water:

_ D'Souza rightly argues that the national debt has risen to $16 trillion under Obama. But he never mentions the explosion of debt that occurred under Obama's predecessor, Republican George W. Bush, nor the 2008 global financial crisis that provoked a shock to the U.S. economy.

_ D'Souza says Obama is "weirdly sympathetic to Muslim jihadists" in Afghanistan and Pakistan. He does not mention that Obama ordered the raid that killed Osama bin Laden and the drone strikes that have killed dozens of other terrorists in the region.

_D'Souza wrongly claims that Obama wants to return control of the Falkland Islands from Britain to Argentina. The U.S. refused in April to endorse a final declaration on Argentina's claim to the islands at the Summit of the Americas, provoking criticism from other Latin American nations.

_D'Souza says Obama has "done nothing" to impede Iran's nuclear ambitions, despite the severe trade and economic sanctions his administration has imposed on that country to halt its suspected nuclear program. Obama opposes a near-term military strike on Iran, either by the U.S. or Israel, although he says the U.S. will never tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran.

_ D'Souza says Obama removed a bust of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill from the Oval Office because Churchill represented British colonialism. White House curator William Allman said the bust, which had been on loan, was already scheduled to be returned before Obama took office. Another bust of Churchill is on display in the president's private residence, the White House says." '2016: Obama's America' Fact-Check

"2016: Obama's America is a tempest in a Tea Party. Dinesh D'Souza's movie is a breathless attempt to find questions for the long since settled answers widely known by most of America. Dressed up to look serious, it is actually just one more attempt to define President Barack Obama as an outsider using red-baiting, fear mongering and intellectual dishonesty. The irony is that these contrivances are engineered by a filmmaker whose subjectivity and heterodox beliefs put him well outside fact and public opinion." Michael Berkowitz: '2016: Obama's America': Save Your Money, Use Your Vouchers

To call it crap without watching it, is well.....stupid.

Huffington post? Really?

Let the Huffington post do your thinking for you and you will remain..... stupid.
 
Yes. Inspiring. So well written......especially considering that Loverbear's "s" key is jammed.

So many nutters have difficulty with plurals.

Spend a little time analyzing the bilge from LilOlBat and Truthmatters (gone for good?) in here if you want to see some really inventive English grammar, spelling, lack of punctuation, etc. And they've got plenty of lefty company in here too.
 
She's basing her vote on a movie made by a staunch conservative author?

It's not surprising that she was still undecided 2 weeks to election. Idiots have trouble deciding.
 
She's basing her vote on a movie made by a staunch conservative author?

It's not surprising that she was still undecided 2 weeks to election. Idiots have trouble deciding.

When will you have a decision?

When I get candidates that are worth my vote.

Could be a long wait.

I see, so people that take their time deciding on who, if anyone, would best represent their values are idiots.

In my experience rash decisions usually don't play out so well. I think it's rather smart to take some time deciding on important matters.
 
The more people see Obama and Romney side by side, the bigger a lead Romney builds.

One is a competent, skillful executive, the other is the punchline to the biggest political joke ever played on the American public
 

Forum List

Back
Top