One in every Five Americans think Obama is a Muslim

Religion plays almost no role for this President. He is a diehard Saul Alinsky-trained Marxist. He's a Saul Alinsky Community Organizer. Marxists like Mao Tse Tung and Joseph Stalin despised religion and eliminated it in their countries. Look at what Mao Tse Tung did to the Buddhists in Tibet. So this debate really is silly & meaningless. This current President is an indoctrinated life-long Marxist. Nuff said.

Agreed.

There is little doubt that the Hussein is a closet atheist, like most far left radical politicians. He just pretends to be Christian just to make himself electable.

So he is a atheist, muslim, wrong Christian church going marxist, socialist Kenyan, manchurian plant who was supposedly born in Hawaii? Damn, this man is amazing!

I thought Orly Taits was ******* nuts but you guys are just sad. Get ******* over it, you lost.
 
Last edited:
Poor Obama. He can't even go for a swim on his vacation because of shit in the water. This ******* idiot makes Bush look like George Washington.
 
So he is a atheist, muslim, wrong Christian church going marxist, socialist Kenyan, manchurian plant who was supposedly born in Hawaii? Damn, this man is amazing!

I thought Orly Taits was ******* nuts but you guys are just sad. Get ******* over it, you lost.


He is whatever he needs to be when its politically expedient. Thought you would of known that by know. :lol:
 
The sweet sound of the Islamic call to evening prayer comment he made might have helped President Obama lead many people to suspect that he is a Muslim.

And isn't the figure closer to one in four? http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2011799,00.html

LOL.

This President is a dumbass. I love it when he opens his dopey mouth.
 
Last edited:
Religion plays almost no role for this President. He is a diehard Saul Alinsky-trained Marxist. He's a Saul Alinsky Community Organizer. Marxists like Mao Tse Tung and Joseph Stalin despised religion and eliminated it in their countries. Look at what Mao Tse Tung did to the Buddhists in Tibet. So this debate really is silly & meaningless. This current President is an indoctrinated life-long Marxist. Nuff said.

Where do you get your information?? Hasn't anybody ever told you that wishing doesn't make it so??? Take your meds.
 
As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood.

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.

Zionists and other anti-Muslims will attempt to pass off even the most obvious falsehoods as facts; their extreme arrogance leads them not only to lie, but to go as far as making ridiculous claims that their nonsense reflects something "as it is universally understood."

The gullible among us have apparently failed to notice that this article was so egregiously dishonest that it prompted a lengthy rebuke from the public editor of the Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/opinion/01pubed.html

:lol:
 
Religion plays almost no role for this President. He is a diehard Saul Alinsky-trained Marxist. He's a Saul Alinsky Community Organizer. Marxists like Mao Tse Tung and Joseph Stalin despised religion and eliminated it in their countries. Look at what Mao Tse Tung did to the Buddhists in Tibet. So this debate really is silly & meaningless. This current President is an indoctrinated life-long Marxist. Nuff said.

You may on to something, obama is anti spiritual religion. I believe he has a religion but it a humanistic religion. I believe it is his attempt to cause a bigger rift between the muslim religion and Christian religion killing two birds with one stone.
 
As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood.

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.

Zionists and other anti-Muslims will attempt to pass off even the most obvious falsehoods as facts; their extreme arrogance leads them not only to lie, but to go as far as making ridiculous claims that their nonsense reflects something "as it is universally understood."

The gullible among us have apparently failed to notice that this article was so egregiously dishonest that it prompted a lengthy rebuke from the public editor of the Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/opinion/01pubed.html

:lol:

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.

Do you know who owns the new york times? Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr (a jew)
 
He may not be a Muslim, but he damn sure is a sympathizer.
 
Do you know who owns the new york times? Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr (a jew)

A Jewish media mogul?? No way! :eek:

Well you did make this comment

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.
And you use the New York times as a reference
 
Do you know who owns the new york times? Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr (a jew)

A Jewish media mogul?? No way! :eek:

Well you did make this comment

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.
And you use the New York times as a reference

The original article and the rebuke were both in the New York Times.
 
A Jewish media mogul?? No way! :eek:

Well you did make this comment

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.
And you use the New York times as a reference

The original article and the rebuke were both in the New York Times.

AND? You condemn others for using so called Jewish information but yet you are doing the same thing.
 
I wonder what party those idiots who say Obama is a muslim.....I have a feeling they arent dems...lol
 
15th post
As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood.

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.

Zionists and other anti-Muslims will attempt to pass off even the most obvious falsehoods as facts; their extreme arrogance leads them not only to lie, but to go as far as making ridiculous claims that their nonsense reflects something "as it is universally understood."

The gullible among us have apparently failed to notice that this article was so egregiously dishonest that it prompted a lengthy rebuke from the public editor of the Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/opinion/01pubed.html

:lol:
That quote of Franklin Graham, is the latest talking point from the RNC, apparently.
 
Well you did make this comment

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.
And you use the New York times as a reference

The original article and the rebuke were both in the New York Times.

AND? You condemn others for using so called Jewish information but yet you are doing the same thing.

:lol:

I used it to point out that the article was so ridiculously inaccurate that the NYT had no choice but to rebuke it.
 
As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood.

This is the type of misconception that tends to be spread when one relies on the ignorant aspersions of Zionist Jews for information about Shari'ah.

Zionists and other anti-Muslims will attempt to pass off even the most obvious falsehoods as facts; their extreme arrogance leads them not only to lie, but to go as far as making ridiculous claims that their nonsense reflects something "as it is universally understood."

The gullible among us have apparently failed to notice that this article was so egregiously dishonest that it prompted a lengthy rebuke from the public editor of the Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/opinion/01pubed.html

:lol:
That quote of Franklin Graham, is the latest talking point from the RNC, apparently.

I really cannot believe that guy. I just love these holier than thou Christians. Never have there been such hypocrites.
 
Last edited:
the original article and the rebuke were both in the new york times.

and? You condemn others for using so called jewish information but yet you are doing the same thing.

:lol:

I used it to point out that the article was so ridiculously inaccurate that the nyt had no choice but to rebuke it.

but yet you used a jewish group to support what you said. Kind of hypocrtical of you if you ask me.
 
Back
Top Bottom