There is nothing ambiguous in what I posted directly from the bill or you would have highlighted the ambiguity.
And it was dropped because the GOP smear machine is just too good at manipulating mindless drones like you.
So why didn't they just revise the language, simplify it and keep the provision?
That section of the bill also contains this:
Who makes up this 'consensus-based organization'? I asked this in another thread and someone provided this answer:
Thats answered in section 122:
“Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced, and premium plans.” This will be chaired by the Surgeon General and will have “9 members who are not Federal employees or officers and who are appointed by the President”, “9 members who are not Federal employees or officers and who are appointed by the Comptroller General”, and an “even number of members (not to exceed 8 ) who are Federal employees and officers, as the President may appoint.” A committe with up to 27 members, 18 of whom are picked by the President. The bill says these people will “reflect providers, consumer representatives, employers, labor, health insurance issuers, experts in health care financing and delivery, experts in racial and ethnic disparities, experts in care for those with disabilities, representatives of relevant governmental agencies, and at least one practicing physician or other health professional and an expert on children’s health”. But with no checks and balances on the selection of this group, you can only hope that absolute power does not corrupt absolutely.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...-of-life-council-euthenasia-talk-origins.html
More 'czars' making the decisions of what benefits are covered and they are appointed with no checks and balances . . . . and you wonder why people put up the flags?
And the bill says what the standard the end of life orders oversight committee is supposed to check for:
A program for orders for life sustaining treatment for a States described in this clause is a 9
program that— 10
‘‘(I)
ensures such orders are standardized 11
and uniquely identifiable throughout the State; 12
‘‘(II) distributes or makes accessible such 13
orders to physicians and other health profes-14
sionals that (acting within the scope of the pro-15
fessionalÂ’s authority under State law) may sign 16
orders for life sustaining treatment; 17
‘‘(III) provides training for health care 18
professionals across the continuum of care 19
about the goals and use of orders for life sus-20
taining treatment; and 21
‘‘(IV) is guided by a coalition of stake-22
holders includes representatives from emergency 23
medical services, emergency department physi-24
cians or nurses, state long-term care associa-25
tion, state medical association, state surveyors, agency responsible for senior services, state de-2
partment of health, state hospital association, 3
home health association, state bar association, 4
and state hospice association. 5