RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
Wanted to serve.Why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wanted to serve.Why?
Why?
I have no animosity for the very small percentage who had moral qualms. In fact I admire men like Ali who refused to serve and went to prison to support their beliefs. Most draft dodgers had no moral qualms, they just were either cowards or didn’t want the inconvenience of serving.Good question.
I joined the Army soon after the Tet Offensive because I was wrecking motorcycles, jumping off of waterfalls, drinking heavily, mastering the art of home made "Firecrackers" and getting into so much trouble that my dear old mother told me:
"Oh, I'm so glad that you're going into the Army where you'll be nice and safe."
I have absolutely no enmity toward those who chose not to serve and could have avoided service altogether but felt that doing so would have been unethical.
Who knows what to do with your life at the age of 18?
Draftees have won almost every war in history. The Romans and Spartans were singular exceptions. Professional armies were very rare and only existed where manpower wasn’t an issue. Even the British Army couldn’t mass enough volunteer troops to fight in the American Revolution, more than half the deployed troops were German ( Hessian) mercenaries.You don't win a war by drafting an army. Listening to people discuss how lucky they had a REMF job (you'll figure it out) tells you all you need to know about fielding a fighting force through a draft. The only way this could have a chance to be successful is if you are fighting on your own soil.
Look at little Ukraine, more importantly, look at the Russian draft. They are getting the same result we did in Vietnam.
I got it. Why did you choose marines?Wanted to serve.
That all changed with the Information Age. The time period you mention is correct, but can't be compared with now.Draftees have won almost every war in history. The Romans and Spartans were singular exceptions. Professional armies were very rare and only existed where manpower wasn’t an issue. Even the British Army couldn’t mass enough volunteer troops to fight in the American Revolution, more than half the deployed troops were German ( Hessian) mercenaries.
The first thing on the Peanut Man's agenda was to pardon every freaking traitor who fled to the people's republic of Canada to avoid the draft. In ten years the traitors were running college campuses and the federal government.
Because I had a bad reenlistment code from the army when I was 17 and they were willing to waive it.I got it. Why did you choose marines?
I have no animosity for the very small percentage who had moral qualms. In fact I admire men like Ali who refused to serve and went to prison to support their beliefs. Most draft dodgers had no moral qualms, they just were either cowards or didn’t want the inconvenience of serving.
Nice. Were there any regrets from your or MC sides?Because I had a bad reenlistment code from the army when I was 17 and they were willing to waive it.
No I served 16 years and got a medical retirementNice. Were there any regrets from your or MC sides?
And what this 16 year service gave you?No I served 16 years and got a medical retirement
retirement I was discharged from the service in 1995 and haven't worked since 1999And what this 16 year service gave you?
I disagree, so far in the information age, no army has been able to replace losses suffered in mass combat by expensively trained professional troops. Iran and Irag had to resort to draftees, both Russia and Ukraine have had to resort to draftees despite Ukraine starting out with a very American-like well-trained peacetime army.That all changed with the Information Age. The time period you mention is correct, but can't be compared with now.
![]()
Information Age - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org