you are the one PURPOSELY being the Nutter....for your own delusional partisan satisfaction I suppose and you have every right to be that "nutter"....
that does not negate you being wrong nor negate the LIE you are spreading
NO ONE SAID high unemployment is good...that's simply a LIE on your part and YOU know it, yet you babble on about it and regurgitate the LIE over and over again.... I suppose that is called "good ethics" in your book, but it ain't in mine....
Simple linear logic, care.
If unemployment compensation stimulates the economy we need only to put more people on the dole to get the best effect.
Signed,
Cloward and Piven
but THAT is NOT simple logic Hortyhugs

....unemployment compensation, VERSES NO unemployment compensation given to the people who were laid off, stimulates the economy....
the choice never was unemployment compensation verses having a job...it has always been about U/E compensation for those laid off verses giving those laid off NOTHING in UE compensation....and the truth be known, paying unemployment compensation for those who lost their jobs, does help the economy more than if these laid off workers were given nothing....and there just is no dancing around that fact imho....and it does keep may others from losing their jobs because the unemployment compensation is going towards paying for things in the economy....more grocers stay employed, more electric company employees stay employed, fewer landlords are stuck with renters that can't pay their rent etc etc etc....
and yes, I can see that there is a price to pay as well for issuing U/E...it gets added to our debt....but it is NOT suppose to do such and it would not be doing that if the actuaries who figured out how much employers should pay in UE insurance to cover their layoffs, had collected enough for a major downturn such as the one we faced...live and learn on that front....