OMG! Romney Running AGAIN? JUST SAY NO!

[JimBowie1958]

Putin would be my first choice.

Yeah I know. You're a terrible person.

Oh, come off it. You only dislike Putin because he is THEIR fascist imperial President. Were he in the USA in our WH, you would love him.

 

[martybegan]

It does look like he's warming up for it. And if it's true, it's because GOP leaders are encouraging him to do so. Why? Because at least they know that Christie, Ryan, Rubio and Paul simply can't win. Women don't like these guys, and THEY DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE.

Chris Christie won over 60% of female voters in 2013 and he was running against a female candidate.

By 2016 they will have had 3 full years to paint Christie as both a nutjob rightist AND a RINO, (and fat, don't forget he fat, Taft fat).

 

[JimBowie1958]

If republicans give us another obama we will absolutely deserve what will happen. Romney has a pretty good argument. He was right about everything.

Romney is right about things in his election speeches, then wrong when he is actually in office.

Show me anything he did as governor that supports his being right about anything. He is only right when he mimics Palin.

 

[martybegan]

It doesn't matter who the Republicans run, they will lose. Look, the electorate is still pretty much split, but any Democratic candidate has a huge advantage. Despite the fact that Republicans have the advantage in House races, the fact remains that for the last few elections, Democrats have taken more votes in House races than Republicans. The votes are just in the wrong places to give Dems the House, but when it comes to the presidential election, Dems have a huge advantage. The second problem Republicans will be facing is the fact that the economy is on the rebound and gaining strength little by little. By election time, the economy is going to be looking good. Bottom line is that the Dems could run Howdy Doodie and win in 2016.

Bold statements for late 2014.

 

[JimBowie1958]

It does look like he's warming up for it. And if it's true, it's because GOP leaders are encouraging him to do so. Why? Because at least they know that Christie, Ryan, Rubio and Paul simply can't win. Women don't like these guys, and THEY DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE.

Chris Christie won over 60% of female voters in 2013 and he was running against a female candidate.

By 2016 they will have had 3 full years to paint Christie as both a nutjob rightist AND a RINO, (and fat, don't forget he fat, Taft fat).

Christie shot himself in the foot by hugging Obama. That gave a pic that would kill him in GOP primaries and he should have known that. Plus he fills his staff with thugs and sycophants like any typical NE political whore.

 

[martybegan]

It does look like he's warming up for it. And if it's true, it's because GOP leaders are encouraging him to do so. Why? Because at least they know that Christie, Ryan, Rubio and Paul simply can't win. Women don't like these guys, and THEY DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE.

Chris Christie won over 60% of female voters in 2013 and he was running against a female candidate.

By 2016 they will have had 3 full years to paint Christie as both a nutjob rightist AND a RINO, (and fat, don't forget he fat, Taft fat).

Christie shot himself in the foot by hugging Obama. That gave a pic that would kill him in GOP primaries and he should have known that. Plus he fills his staff with thugs and sycophants like any typical NE political whore.

The thugs and sycophants is really a big NJ thing. I get to hear/see their election commercials as i live in NYC, and they go negative right off the ******* bat.

The one advantage that brings is any negative crap about him has already been brought to the surface. It would have been found when he FIRST ran for governor.

 

[JimBowie1958]

It does look like he's warming up for it. And if it's true, it's because GOP leaders are encouraging him to do so. Why? Because at least they know that Christie, Ryan, Rubio and Paul simply can't win. Women don't like these guys, and THEY DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE.

Chris Christie won over 60% of female voters in 2013 and he was running against a female candidate.

By 2016 they will have had 3 full years to paint Christie as both a nutjob rightist AND a RINO, (and fat, don't forget he fat, Taft fat).

Christie shot himself in the foot by hugging Obama. That gave a pic that would kill him in GOP primaries and he should have known that. Plus he fills his staff with thugs and sycophants like any typical NE political whore.

The thugs and sycophants is really a big NJ thing. I get to hear/see their election commercials as i live in NYC, and they go negative right off the ******* bat.

The one advantage that brings is any negative crap about him has already been brought to the surface. It would have been found when he FIRST ran for governor.

It has been my observation that there is usually a set of negatives that are so dramatic and polarizing that they can only be used in a national election as it costs millions in advertising to convince the public that it is a valid concern and not just some crazy accusation.

90% of our politicians are ugly monstrous people who are far worse than our worst dreams suspect, owned and played by lobbyists and the sooner we realize this the quicker we can fix the mess.

 

[Katzndogz]

Romney doesn't hate this country like obama does. He doesn't want to start a nationwide race war like obama does.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Romney doesn't hate this country like obama does. He doesn't want to start a nationwide race war like obama does.

True, he loves it, gets a full return on his investments more often, lol.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Democrats are trying to steal every election with amnesty so it may no longer matter.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Why not Mittens?

Sure, he will lose again but it's not like they have anyone who can actually win.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Putin would be my first choice.

Well Yabut, you're a traitor.

 

[Katzndogz]

Putin would be my first choice.

Well Yabut, you're a traitor.

A traitor to obama.

 

[tosacco]

Even if Romney decided to run, I doubt he'd be able to muster the economic backing to be a serious contender. He might represent business interests pretty well, but he would need an entire rebranding to be sold to the American public again. It seems like the Republican Party would have better chances with a new candidate.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It doesn't matter who the Republicans run, they will lose. Look, the electorate is still pretty much split, but any Democratic candidate has a huge advantage. Despite the fact that Republicans have the advantage in House races, the fact remains that for the last few elections, Democrats have taken more votes in House races than Republicans. The votes are just in the wrong places to give Dems the House, but when it comes to the presidential election, Dems have a huge advantage. The second problem Republicans will be facing is the fact that the economy is on the rebound and gaining strength little by little. By election time, the economy is going to be looking good. Bottom line is that the Dems could run Howdy Doodie and win in 2016.

The actual election record is that when the GOP nominates a real conservative, they win. When they nominate a moderate that is supposed to have a better chance to win, they lose. Why? Because the GOP is like 80% conservative. The electorate is about 20% liberal, 35% moderate, and 45% conservative (as self identified). Yet in elections where Republicans lose the exit polls show about as many conservatives voted as liberals and the moderates are 40% of the vote. Why? Because moderates FAIL to get all the conservatives out to vote. The GOP RINOs claim that the conservatives have no where else to go but to vote for them, and they are proven wrong every election that has a moderate run for the GOP. Where do the conservative voters go? To the couch and stay home and do not vote and that means the GOP loses.

IF the GOP nominates a conservative, the GOP wins, every time, and it will be the same in 2016 as well.

What "real conservatives" have won the Presidency in the last 60 years?

 

[SmedlyButler]

If republicans give us another obama we will absolutely deserve what will happen. Romney has a pretty good argument. He was right about everything.

Easy to be "right about everything" if you take both sides of every issue.

The Ambition is Strong in This One.

 

[JimBowie1958]

It doesn't matter who the Republicans run, they will lose. Look, the electorate is still pretty much split, but any Democratic candidate has a huge advantage. Despite the fact that Republicans have the advantage in House races, the fact remains that for the last few elections, Democrats have taken more votes in House races than Republicans. The votes are just in the wrong places to give Dems the House, but when it comes to the presidential election, Dems have a huge advantage. The second problem Republicans will be facing is the fact that the economy is on the rebound and gaining strength little by little. By election time, the economy is going to be looking good. Bottom line is that the Dems could run Howdy Doodie and win in 2016.

The actual election record is that when the GOP nominates a real conservative, they win. When they nominate a moderate that is supposed to have a better chance to win, they lose. Why? Because the GOP is like 80% conservative. The electorate is about 20% liberal, 35% moderate, and 45% conservative (as self identified). Yet in elections where Republicans lose the exit polls show about as many conservatives voted as liberals and the moderates are 40% of the vote. Why? Because moderates FAIL to get all the conservatives out to vote. The GOP RINOs claim that the conservatives have no where else to go but to vote for them, and they are proven wrong every election that has a moderate run for the GOP. Where do the conservative voters go? To the couch and stay home and do not vote and that means the GOP loses.

IF the GOP nominates a conservative, the GOP wins, every time, and it will be the same in 2016 as well.

What "real conservatives" have won the Presidency in the last 60 years?

By 'real' conservative I mean someone who actually believes that the Constitution is STILL a relevant guideline to our electoral process and binds limitations to our government.

Reagan was such a conservative and the judicial appointments since then has leavened the whole loaf.

 

[Jackson]

Romney doesn't hate this country like obama does. He doesn't want to start a nationwide race war like obama does.

True, he loves it, gets a full return on his investments more often, lol.

Cut the crap about him being rich. It's not a sin. Kennedy was rich, too and it didn't hurt him in the polls. Look at the dismal job Obama is doing in the WH and think how it would be different if Romney would have won.

We might have some political capital in the world, at least we wouldn't be a laughing stock and other countries would be respecting us again and race issues wouldn't be at the boiling point. I firmly believe our economy would be in a better condition and most of all, we would have had a full time president.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Has a defeated candidate who lost 4 or 8 years prior ever come back and then won?

 

[Katzndogz]

Putin would be my first choice.

Yeah I know. You're a terrible person.

Oh, come off it. You only dislike Putin because he is THEIR fascist imperial President. Were he in the USA in our WH, you would love him.

In order for Putin to become a leftist darling he would have to become black and non Christian. Then they would love him and acknowledge that he was only helping the Ukraine become more diverse. He wouldn't have invaded, he would be bringing them into the 21st Century multicultural world.