Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 17, 2009
72,659
40,831
2,645
Las Vegas, Nevada
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So far, I Support this bill 100%

It is going to take bills like this one to finally get the Supreme Court to reconcile the legal status of "children in the womb" as set by our State and Federal "fetal homicide " laws with the Court's previous rulings on cases like Roe v Wade.

My money is on the Court's eventual overturning of Roe.
 
Last edited:
200.gif
 
Because the "personal business" you're talking about involves the calculated killing of other people (innocent people).
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So many problems in the US and the world, including the over populating of the world, and people are out there trying to put their religion onto other people.
 
"Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business?"

Because they're fundamentally arrogant, intolerant, and authoritarian; conservatives for the most part fear diversity, dissent, and individual liberty, seeking to compel conformity through force of law.

Consequently they refuse to respect the privacy rights of women.
 
Are there any abortion proponents who are intellectually honest enough to recognize the fact that the precedent established in our fetal homicide laws is a direct contradiction to the precedent established by the Supreme Court in Roe?

I mean, after all. . . when Roe was being decided, the Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart said. "Well, if it were established that an unborn fetus is a person within the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment, you would have almost an impossible case here, would you not?"

And when the Federal Fetal Homicide law was being passed, then Planned Parenthood President "Gloria Feldt" said; "If they are able to make fetuses people in law with the same standing as women and men, then Roe will be moot"

Since that time - at least 38 States have passed Fetal Homicide laws of their own.

This has not been a coincidence.
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So many problems in the US and the world, including the over populating of the world, and people are out there trying to put their religion onto other people.

What the hell does religion have to do with when a life begins biologically and with what our Constitution says a person's rights are to the protections of our laws?

These are not religious endeavors.
 
"Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business?"

Because they're fundamentally arrogant, intolerant, and authoritarian; conservatives for the most part fear diversity, dissent, and individual liberty, seeking to compel conformity through force of law.

Consequently they refuse to respect the privacy rights of women.


No one has the right to "privately" violate the rights of a child.

I doubt that even a pro-abort like yourself would argue that they do.
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So many problems in the US and the world, including the over populating of the world, and people are out there trying to put their religion onto other people.
It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with reality.
 
"Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business?"

Because they're fundamentally arrogant, intolerant, and authoritarian; conservatives for the most part fear diversity, dissent, and individual liberty, seeking to compel conformity through force of law.

Consequently they refuse to respect the privacy rights of women.
Is it "personal business" if you decide to murder your neighbor?
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So many problems in the US and the world, including the over populating of the world, and people are out there trying to put their religion onto other people.

What the hell does religion have to do with when a life begins biologically and with what our Constitution says a person's rights are to the protections of our laws?

These are not religious endeavors.

Let's try this.

Life. What a wonderful thing, let's protect it.

Wait, those pro-lifers are going around eating cow and pigs and sheep and chickens and fish all over the place. So it's not about LIFE then is it? It's about HUMAN LIFE and this is a religious issue. Many religions feel the need to protect human life in some way, at least at the beginning. Why? Probably because these religions are from a time when people had lots of children and many of those would die in childhood or early adulthood, so you needed a lot of them to work the fields and make your old age as comfortable as possible.

Things have changed, you might have noticed. It's not necessary any more to protect human life as much as it was. We're producing like horny rabbits, 7 billion people on this planet is TOO MANY PEOPLE.

So, it's about religion, it's about saving souls (you might have noticed that a soul is just a belief system, you can't see or feel a soul) and souls are all about religion.

That's what it's got to do with religion. Most people who are anti-abortion will be religious.
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So many problems in the US and the world, including the over populating of the world, and people are out there trying to put their religion onto other people.

What the hell does religion have to do with when a life begins biologically and with what our Constitution says a person's rights are to the protections of our laws?

These are not religious endeavors.

Let's try this.

Life. What a wonderful thing, let's protect it.

Wait, those pro-lifers are going around eating cow and pigs and sheep and chickens and fish all over the place. So it's not about LIFE then is it?

Our Constitution does not say that all likf is entitled to the equal protections of our laws. It says that all PERSONS are entitled to the equal protections of our laws.

It's a beautifully written document. You should read it sometime.

It's about HUMAN LIFE and this is a religious issue.

I disagree. I don't need God or religion to know the biological facts on how a child's life begins and I don't need God or religion to know what the Constitution says about the right to due process and the equal protections of our laws either.

Are you really not aware of any atheists, agnostics or secularists who oppose abortion?

Many religions feel the need to protect human life in some way, at least at the beginning. Why? Probably because these religions are from a time when people had lots of children and many of those would die in childhood or early adulthood, so you needed a lot of them to work the fields and make your old age as comfortable as possible.

I have no doubt that many religious people have strong religious views on the subject of abortion. However, the 1st Amendment forbids the making of laws to establish or to mandate those religious views. And, as I said above, religion is not needed for our courts to determine personhood anyway.

Religion was not used as the basis for our fetal homicide laws and religion will not be necessary for the same precedent to be set in arguments against Roe.

Things have changed, you might have noticed. It's not necessary any more to protect human life as much as it was. We're producing like horny rabbits, 7 billion people on this planet is TOO MANY PEOPLE.

Even if those / your claims and arguments had any merit at all (and I disagree that they do) - Our Constitution still says what it says about the equal rights and equal protections for all.

Constitutionally, we (the people) do not have the right to make exceptions to that language without making a Constitutional Amendment.

So, it's about religion, it's about saving souls (you might have noticed that a soul is just a belief system, you can't see or feel a soul) and souls are all about religion.

I think the Supreme Court will agree that it is the living body of a human being that qualifies it for protections and rights established in our Constitution. Not something which may not even exist - like souls.

That's what it's got to do with religion. Most people who are anti-abortion will be religious.

Like I said, I do not deny the reality that people with strong religious views have strong views on abortion.

They clearly do.

There are areas where the secular lines of argument and reasoning might parallel, support and intersect those religious beliefs too. . . But so what? Are we to abandon those secular lines of reasoning just because those arguments too closely support the religious conclusions of others?

I for one don't agree that would be a wise thing to do.
 
Last edited:
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So many problems in the US and the world, including the over populating of the world, and people are out there trying to put their religion onto other people.

What the hell does religion have to do with when a life begins biologically and with what our Constitution says a person's rights are to the protections of our laws?

These are not religious endeavors.

Let's try this.

Life. What a wonderful thing, let's protect it.

Wait, those pro-lifers are going around eating cow and pigs and sheep and chickens and fish all over the place. So it's not about LIFE then is it?

Our Constitution does not say that all likf is entitled to the equal protections of our laws. It says that all PERSONS are entitled to the equal protections of our laws.

It's a beautifully written document. You should read it sometime.

It's about HUMAN LIFE and this is a religious issue.

I disagree. I don't need God or religion to know the biological facts on how a child's life begins and I don't need God or religion to know what the Constitution says about the right to due process and the equal protections of our laws either.

Are you really not aware of any atheists, agnostics or secularists who oppose abortion?

Many religions feel the need to protect human life in some way, at least at the beginning. Why? Probably because these religions are from a time when people had lots of children and many of those would die in childhood or early adulthood, so you needed a lot of them to work the fields and make your old age as comfortable as possible.

I have no doubt that many religious people have strong religious views on the subject of abortion. However, the 1st Amendment forbids the making of laws to establish or to mandate those religious views. And, as I said above, religion is not needed for our courts to determine personhood anyway.

Religion was not used as the basis for our fetal homicide laws and religion will not be necessary for the same precedent to be set in arguments against Roe.

Things have changed, you might have noticed. It's not necessary any more to protect human life as much as it was. We're producing like horny rabbits, 7 billion people on this planet is TOO MANY PEOPLE.

Even if those / your claims and arguments had any merit at all (and I disagree that they do) - Our Constitution still says what it says about the equal rights and equal protections for all.

Constitutionally, we (the people) do not have the right to make exceptions to that language without making a Constitutional Amendment.

So, it's about religion, it's about saving souls (you might have noticed that a soul is just a belief system, you can't see or feel a soul) and souls are all about religion.

I think the Supreme Court will agree that it is the living body of a human being that qualifies it for protections and rights established in our Constitution. Not something which may not even exist - like souls.

That's what it's got to do with religion. Most people who are anti-abortion will be religious.

Like I said, I do not deny the reality that people with strong religious views have strong views on abortion.

They clearly do.

There are areas where the secular lines of argument and reasoning might parallel, support and intersect those religious beliefs too. . . But so what? Are we to abandon those secular lines of reasoning just because those arguments too closely support the religious conclusions of others?

I for one don't agree that would be a wise thing to do.

I didn't say that I was referring to the US Constitution. I was referring to people who claim to be "pro-life", you should try reading what I write sometimes...

You don't need a god or religion to know how a child's life is formed. I'm betting it isn't much different to how a chicken's life is formed, or a cow's, or a pig's, or any of the other animals many of the pro-lifers are gobbling down every day.
So, what's so special about a child's life compared to that of another animal?

There might be atheists who are apposed to abortion. I didn't say there weren't, most people who are anti-abortion are probably religious though.

You seem to think the Constitution is the only thing people should be looking at. I'm not sure why. I'm not even talking about the Constitution.

I'm talking about being pro- or anti-abortion.
 
Why is it so hard for Republicans to stay out of people's personal business? Even if this law manages to pass, which I doubt, the state will then end up spending tens of thousands of dollars failing to defend it from court challenges. This issue was settled in 1973. Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. — In a move that is unprecedented nationwide, an Oklahoma Senator has introduced a bill that would criminalize abortion as first-degree murder.

Sen. Joe Silk, R-Broken Bow, recently introduced S.B. 1118 which adds killing an unborn child to existing murder statutes.

“No person shall perform or induce or attempt to perform or induce an abortion after conception,” it reads. “A person commits murder in the first degree when that person performs an abortion as defined by Section 1-745.5 of Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”

Oklahoma Senator Introduces Bill to Criminalize Abortion as First-Degree Murder

So far, I Support this bill 100%

It is going to take bills like this one to finally get the Supreme Court to reconcile the legal status of "children in the womb" as set by our State and Federal "fetal homicide " laws with the Court's previous rulings on cases like Roe v Wade.

My money is on the Court's eventual overturning of Roe.
Yes!! Bring it to the Supreme Court, 4-4, now that asshole is gone the left gets a better shot at a permanent abortion bill barring murder as an excuse for an abortion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top