iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,919
- 1,600
It's a valid question.You are gullible, aren't you.
My physicians have to earn their pay, not be selected by the people they sucked up to.
who validates legally its safe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's a valid question.You are gullible, aren't you.
My physicians have to earn their pay, not be selected by the people they sucked up to.
If people knew the laws that their localities, counties, states and the fed have on the books for hiring, there would be a national lynching.It's a valid question.
who validates legally its safe?
Actually, I do as I have relatives and friends who got where they are in government by assuaging politicians.
It's you who have no idea how these positions are filled.
Moron...That's how government protects itself!I do not care how the positions are filled. When a company is sued and the judge ask them how they determined the vaccine was safe, they will use the FDA and CDC as their experts. Not some random doctor they might have hired who has no possible way to determine the safety of a vaccine.
The fact is that anyone who does not have a condition where their medication will fail to work because of the shot should get it.I do not care how the positions are filled. When a company is sued and the judge ask them how they determined the vaccine was safe, they will use the FDA and CDC as their experts. Not some random doctor they might have hired who has no possible way to determine the safety of a vaccine.
how does that answer the question?If people knew the laws that their localities, counties, states and the fed have on the books for hiring, there would be a national lynching.
I'm not a lawyer and I have zero knowledge of the myriad layers of law that protect businesses on one hand and allow government control on the other.how does that answer the question?
Oklahoma says an employer must validate vaccine safety.
what constitutes following the law so an employer does that first?
VAERS. and countries who are banning the dang vaccines..........cough cough......leaky vaccines that don't stop you from getting the virus and allow you to spread it.I do not care how the positions are filled. When a company is sued and the judge ask them how they determined the vaccine was safe, they will use the FDA and CDC as their experts. Not some random doctor they might have hired who has no possible way to determine the safety of a vaccine.
Back to VAERs they can only hide it for sooo long. 600 k and more reported. And most don't even know it exists.
Really. I've been pointing out this information for a while now. Especially the Vaccine Courts and when they got their get out of Jail Free card from Reagan.I love how you fucking morons all of sudden found VAERs, but are too stupid to even know what it reports.
again, nothing to do with the question at hand.I'm not a lawyer and I have zero knowledge of the myriad layers of law that protect businesses on one hand and allow government control on the other.
I am wondering if the businesses that give larger donations get exemptions from the rules.
The problem with COVID is that the legislative powers that be and the media have caused it to be enemy number one and that any measure to suppress the economy is allowed.
Screw the CDC...I consulted with a few people who were chemists.again, nothing to do with the question at hand.
Oklahoma passed a law saying an employer is liable unless they verified the vac was safe first.
verified by who?
so far GG saying CDC is all we have and it seems like the best answer whether I like the current cdc or not.
Only GG is intelligent enough to know how to keep a track of the effects of a vaccine or a medication.Really. I've been pointing out this information for a while now. Especially the Vaccine Courts and when they got their get out of Jail Free card from Reagan.
I didn't just suddenly find it. It's on the CDC site and tells you to REPORT ADVERSE EFFECTS.
So whats the fucking problem..........Oh I know . Too many are reporting that these vaccines suck hairy balls and you don't like it.
I didn't just suddenly find it. It's on the CDC site and tells you to REPORT ADVERSE EFFECTS.
One would have to be really stupid not to now why every product under the sun has warnings.so you have known about it for years? or is it just this year that you found out it exist?
Did you read all the disclaimers? Or are you just going by what your party emails tell you to post?
agreed.Screw the CDC...I consulted with a few people who were chemists.
The CDC holds back medications that have already been on the market for 30+ years in Europe.
Money is king in the US.
I've known about this mickey mouse club court for a long time. It's a court for and BY PHARMA.so you have known about it for years? or is it just this year that you found out it exist?
Did you read all the disclaimers? Or are you just going by what your party emails tell you to post?
One would have to be really stupid not to now why every product under the sun has warnings.
One person in a billion gets a fever from an aspirin and suddenly billions of flowers are harvested to add a warning to a label.
The fact that you can't take a dump unless President Biden approves of it.are you drunk tonight? what the fuck does that have to do with the current conversation?
still doesn't answer the question.The fact that you can't take a dump unless President Biden approves of it.
We know your profession relies on government provided information and so you worship everything the government says.