The addicts get thrown in jail because of public intoxication or possession.
So if drugs are still illegal, most would still be thrown in jail.
No, the way it works is, rather than jail if an addict is arrested (and often it's for theft so they can buy drugs) the Court sentences them to a strictly monitored and intensive drug rehab program and if they misstep they spend a weekend in jail; if they misstep twice they're in jail to serve their sentence. We have quite a large community in recovery around here that has struggled through drug court, stayed out of jail and kicked their addiction all at the same time. It's good to see.
How does that sound?
I would imagine you have heard of many that followed in their parents footsteps. And of their parents usage, how it affected them.
Sometimes. Not as many as you are probably thinking. More times than I can count, grandparents stepped in to keep the kids safe. This is a very rural, economically depressed area that is within spitting distance of Canada and a coastline that has invited smuggling since it was settled a couple hundred years ago. We had a full blown opiate epidemic twenty years before it hit the southern part of the state where the legislators live--and then it suddenly became a "concern." It started with prescription oxycontin and lots of people with very little money. Some got hooked and wanted more, and people who had a script figured out they could make a tidy profit selling what they had left over and then folks tried it recreationally and liked it and the kids got into it and then....the best shit was coming from Canada for years, then when they put the brakes on that, the heroin started coming up from New York and Massachusetts and it still is.