Okay, I Disagree with Trump on This

Those discharged because of the vaccine were allowed back in.

Were the ones close to retirement and eligible for retirement given said retirement?

I think Trump should take the high ground and allow the early retirements, but it should be coupled with anyone who lost theirs over the COVID stupidity getting theirs back.
 
Were the ones close to retirement and eligible for retirement given said retirement?

I think Trump should take the high ground and allow the early retirements, but it should be coupled with anyone who lost theirs over the COVID stupidity getting theirs back.
Yes, thank you. It has nothing to do with the other.
 
What does refusing the COVID shot on religious grounds have to do with having your penis lobbed off or having an addadictomy?

it has to do with being forced out of the service because of it, and the question of someone's early retirement after putting in 15-20 years of service. The causes are different, the end result is where the issues meet.
 
I guess it's not a cult after all . . .


WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Air Force said Thursday it would deny all transgender service members who have served between 15 and 18 years the option to retire early and would instead separate them without retirement benefits. One Air Force sergeant said he was “betrayed and devastated” by the move.

The move means that transgender service members will now be faced with the choice of either taking a lump-sum separation payment offered to junior troops or be removed from the service.

An Air Force spokesperson told The Associated Press that “although service members with 15 to 18 years of honorable service were permitted to apply for an exception to policy, none of the exceptions to policy were approved.” About a dozen service members had been “prematurely notified” that they would be able to retire before that decision was reversed, according to the spokesperson who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal Air Force policy.


I agree that pursuing the transgender lifestyle, including hormones and other gender treatment, rather than just cross-dressing on the drag equivalent of karaoke night, is incompatible with military service. But their CIC said they were fine to do that and that the military would pay for it, so they did it. As long as they followed all other orders, and did their jobs when not on medical leave, they were in compliance.

Give them their early retirement and be rid of them. This move will only garner them sympathy, even from Trumpers like myself. They will sue, and if a Democrat ever holds the WH again, they will be settle with, likely for millions.

We rightly complained about honest immigrants being punished for following the rules under Democrats. Let's not punish these confused folk for also following the rules.
The thing is that they were promised retirement pay a few months ago if they submitted their papers and the ones who took them up on that offer were screwed when it was rescinded yesterday.
 
it has to do with being forced out of the service because of it, and the question of someone's early retirement after putting in 15-20 years of service. The causes are different, the end result is where the issues meet.
NOPE. Thank you for you opinion. Noted and dismissed as illogical.
 
First of all we aren't talking about "don't ask-don't tell" homosexual activity. This is an issue that entails constant medical treatment and protection for the trannies who pretend to be members of the opposite sex. How this abomination was allowed to continue for 15 to 18 years in the U.S. Military is anyone's guess. Perhaps the Trannies should be required to pay the government back for the unnecessary medical treatment at taxpayer expense.
 
You cannot just retire early if you are being forced out.
I think you better go back 2 or 3 months when they offered retirement pay if the trans agreed to leave before kicking them all out. It was all over the news. I am very surprised lord god of know it all didn't see.
 
I think you better go back 2 or 3 months when they offered retirement pay if the trans agreed to leave before kicking them all out. It was all over the news. I am very surprised lord god of know it all didn't see.
They probably found out that it was illegal if not authorized by Congress. and the bill would never survive the Democrats and RINOs. My program was passed by a Democrat Congress under Bill Clinton's regime.
 
First of all we aren't talking about "don't ask-don't tell" homosexual activity. This is an issue that entails constant medical treatment and protection for the trannies who pretend to be members of the opposite sex. How this abomination was allowed to continue for 15 to 18 years in the U.S. Military is anyone's guess. Perhaps the Trannies should be required to pay the government back for the unnecessary medical treatment at taxpayer expense.
It did not continue for 15 to 18 years. Starting in 2016, trannies already in the miliary were allowed to come out and still serve.

So guys who had been keeping their dress up activities to weekends in drag clubs in cities far away from their army base could suddenly take that fetish mainstream and every day became halloween.

From their perspective changing it now is a bait and switch. Had they never been allowed in the first place, they could have stayed in whatever secret drag queens call "the closet" and retired after twenty.

Which is fine with me. Dressing like a woman for fun was never against the rules of the military. Homo stuff was, but not playing dress up. Happened in many skits, especially in the Navy. That's what some guys do when deprived of female company.

1754703372470.webp


I saw every episode of Leave it to Beaver when I was a kid. Every episode but one, which I only saw once. The one where Wally wears a dress. I used to wonder as an adult if I had dreamed that episode. But thanks to the internet, I was finally able to confirm it.


Wally has been invited to join The Crusaders, a prestigious high school club for guys. Shortly after he joins the club will be putting on their annual play. This year it is a western, and Wally assumes it will be a bit part because he is new. But it's not exactly a bit part. He in fact has a big part with lots of dialogue and action. Why is this not a good thing according to Wally? Because he is supposed to play a saloon girl and wear a ridiculous outfit! You see, the Crusaders is an all male club, so the guys have to play the female parts as well as the male ones.

Wally is most un-Wally like here. Normally he is so stoic about whatever it is that life throws his way, but here he rants like he is five years old. Ward comes up to his room and offers a possible way out of this situation via a fable. The moral of the fable is to find a bigger fool - to make the part look so attractive to someone else that they want it and thus let him off the hook. Normally I would expect Ward to tell Wally to take this in the fun it is intended, but Ward is not acting like himself either.

So Wally goes looking for that bigger fool - enter stage left Eddie Haskell, who is just an extra in this play and thus only has two lines, but at least he gets to wear trousers! How will this work out? Watch and find out.
 
Back
Top Bottom