OK....I didn't vote for this....Trump says US will accept 600,000 Chinese students as part of trade deal

Hypocrite.
He's not being a hypocrite, he's putting American citizens first.

Why do you always take the side of the immigrant or non-white, every time?

You have no way of knowing that every Chinese student who comes here does so with good intentions. You act as though you having 'conversations' or knowing people personally somehow conveys to cover an entire group. You do the same thing that you accuse others of, only in reverse. :dunno:
 
It is disgraceful to see Americans who are afraid of competition. Real Americans can compete with anyone.

Does America deserve to be its own country and make its own laws? You don't seem to think so.
 
It is disgraceful to see Americans who are afraid of competition. Real Americans can compete with anyone.

Perhaps if it were an even playing field it would be fair. You do know that other cultures discriminate as well? I work for a tech company that employs many of Indian heritage, and when those people get into management positions, they definitely have a bias towards hiring fellow Indians. And as far as offshore employment, they are paying them a small percentage of what they would have to pay anyone here in the states.

I have worked with many from India, mostly males, some female, and I have never heard of one marrying outside of their race. They all go home to be married to whomever their parents have arranged a union with, they never marry non-Indians. Something tells me you would defend that because it's their culture, yet you would accuse whites who might do the same as being racists?
 
I would suggest that the spooks are inter-agency.

U.S. intelligence agencies are encouraging American research universities to develop protocols for monitoring students and visiting scholars from Chinese state-affiliated research institutions, as U.S. suspicion toward China spreads to academia.

Since last year, FBI officials have visited at least 10 members of the Association of American Universities, a group of 62 research universities, with an unclassified list of Chinese research institutions and companies.
This March, U.S. intelligence officials briefed about 70 college administrators of the American Council on Education, according to university participants. The officials said the presidents should increase oversight of Chinese researchers and avoid research funding from Chinese firms like Huawei.

The presidents were "skeptical of many of the claims, but many of them receive U.S. government research money," says a participant briefed at the meeting and who is not authorized to speak publicly.



FBI and NCS; I wonder who else?

Greg

Pearl-clutchers' Yellow Peril
 
He's not being a hypocrite, he's putting American citizens first.

...
He’s being a complete hypocrite. He says he’s against affirmative action, but then calls for affirmative action. What else can you call it?
 
He’s being a complete hypocrite. He says he’s against affirmative action, but then calls for affirmative action. What else can you call it?

Calls for affirmative action for who? Legal vs illegal?

So you believe an illegal in this country should be afforded every right that a citizen is given?
 
Of course. Are you and your straw man having a good time?

It's not a strawman. :dunno: You seem to think that because someone steps across a border they should be afforded every legal right a citizen has? Am I wrong?
 
Calls for affirmative action for who? Legal vs illegal?

So you believe an illegal in this country should be afforded every right that a citizen is given?
???????
Where did legal vs illegal come from? Are you sure you’re in the right thread?
 
???????
Where did legal vs illegal come from? Are you sure you’re in the right thread?
This is the post you responded with 'hypocrite' to? I assumed you were talking about the bolded?



Oh, I see, you are trying to make a comparison between my opposition to racist discrimination against whites,

to my, shall we say, NATIONALISTIC discrimination against non-American citizens.


Yes, I support different rules for AMERICANS, then for NON-AMERICANS.

In competition between AMERICANS, I want the AMERICANS to all be treated fairly, and not to discriminate against people based on race.


In competition between Americans and NON-Americans, especially in a context of A. AMERICAN RESOURCES, and B. coming out of a long period of Americans being fucked,

I just want AMERICANS to ******* win.


Generally speaking.
 
It's not a strawman. :dunno: You seem to think that because someone steps across a border they should be afforded every legal right a citizen has? Am I wrong?
Do you have any idea what the topic of this thread is?
 
15th post
Of course; there is China and there are Barbarians.

Greg
"How Can the Chinese Be So unAmerican That They Believe in Manifest Destiny!!!"

The ethnicities surrounding China are mostly unproductive prehistoric bandits who were driven into the jungles, the deserts, and the frozen North by the evolved Chinese. One of the first groups punished by the Survival of the Fittest wandered into America as fugitives from evolutionary justice.
 
Did you really say “they do it too!” What kind of grade school horse shit is that?

The same grade school horseshit as assuming that if someone is from another country or culture that their intensions are always assumed to be good, which is exactly what you do. It's what you've done throughout the entire thread, we can't throw negative aspirations onto Chinese students, that would be racist, correct? Yet that is the reality that you seemingly want to ignore.

My point is that you are objecting to a group being labeled because of their ethnicity or origin, but you are doing just the same, only in the opposite way. You are implying simply because they come from a different ethnicity or origin that there is nothing to worry about. That is not correct either.
 
Do you have any idea what the topic of this thread is?

You're not being an honest broker, you delete the majority of what I say when you quote me, you don't address anything that was in the original post, why even bother?

Explain why you are calling him a hypocrite.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom