OK gun grabbers you have your mandatory gun registration

[Spoonman]

OH NO!!!!!!!!
Police Investigate Shooting Outside New Year?s Eve Party in Cromwell | NBC Connecticut

One person was shot early this morning as a New Year’s Eve party was breaking up at a hotel in Cromwell.

The shooting happened at the Crowne Plaza at 100 Berlin Road at 2:41 a.m.

I guess its illegal to own a gun but not illegal to shoot some one??wait I'm confused..............

Yeah, something should be built into the system to cover their medical/final expenses.

ain't never going to happen

 

[mamooth]

I thought gun owners would refuse to obey any registration law? Yet there they were in Connecticut, all meekly lining up to register.

Conclusion: All bluster, no balls. Conservatives, that is. They talk big, but never act. And then they wonder why we point and laugh.

 

[candycorn]

I guess its illegal to own a gun but not illegal to shoot some one??wait I'm confused..............

Yeah, something should be built into the system to cover their medical/final expenses.

ain't never going to happen

You seem overjoyed that those who are shot and killed have no recourse except to sue someone to try to get some of their medical/final expenses covered.

 

[candycorn]

I thought gun owners would refuse to obey any registration law? Yet there they were in Connecticut, all meekly lining up to register.

Conclusion: All bluster, no balls. Conservatives, that is. They talk big, but never act. And then they wonder why we point and laugh.

They wouldn't do that in Georgia. They haven't mastered standing in line yet.

 

[Spoonman]

I thought gun owners would refuse to obey any registration law? Yet there they were in Connecticut, all meekly lining up to register.

Conclusion: All bluster, no balls. Conservatives, that is. They talk big, but never act. And then they wonder why we point and laugh.

but how many didn't?

 

[Spoonman]

Yeah, something should be built into the system to cover their medical/final expenses.

ain't never going to happen

You seem overjoyed that those who are shot and killed have no recourse except to sue someone to try to get some of their medical/final expenses covered.

they should sue gun grabbers who have prevented them from protecting themselves. lets put the blame where it belongs

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Two shootings in one day in Connecticut a state that has less than 4 million people.

Person shot in head at New Haven hotel | WTNH.com Connecticut

lets see how connecticut votes in the next elections

I don't know if this poll is full of shit or the people are just ******* stupid, but I don't think so.
Connecticut: Although Gov. Dan Malloy’s (D) approval rating improved after the state passed a new, more restrictive gun law in the wake of the Sandy Hook tragedy, it looks like the incumbent is back in hot water. The latest Quinnipiac poll shows Malloy trailing his 2010 opponent, Tom Foley (R), 43% to 40%. Moreover, the survey found that only 44% of voters thought Malloy deserved to be reelected, with majorities disapproving of his handling of the economy, taxes and the state’s budget. Despite Connecticut’s Democratic tilt, Republican governors held the governor’s office for 16 straight years before Malloy won in 2010, and Nutmeg State voters may be willing to return the GOP to power. Odds are, Foley won’t have the Republican field to himself, with state House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero (R) and state Sen. Minority Leader John McKinney (R) also looking at the race. But Quinnipiac’s survey showed Foley has an early edge over his GOP counterparts, though name recognition is a factor at this point. It’s clear that Malloy is struggling to stay afloat — we’re now calling this contest a TOSS-UP.

Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » GOVERNORS 2014: THE INCUMBENT AVALANCHE

 

[SteadyMercury]

I thought gun owners would refuse to obey any registration law? Yet there they were in Connecticut, all meekly lining up to register.

You can take my gun from my cold dead ha... oh excuse me sir where does the line start?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I thought gun owners would refuse to obey any registration law? Yet there they were in Connecticut, all meekly lining up to register.

Conclusion: All bluster, no balls. Conservatives, that is. They talk big, but never act. And then they wonder why we point and laugh.

They're new england sheeple what do you expect?
Try it down here

 

[candycorn]

ain't never going to happen

You seem overjoyed that those who are shot and killed have no recourse except to sue someone to try to get some of their medical/final expenses covered.

they should sue gun grabbers who have prevented them from protecting themselves. lets put the blame where it belongs

So the 5 year old should have sued someone to carry weapons to 2nd grade. You're insane.

 

[Spoonman]

You seem overjoyed that those who are shot and killed have no recourse except to sue someone to try to get some of their medical/final expenses covered.

they should sue gun grabbers who have prevented them from protecting themselves. lets put the blame where it belongs

So the 5 year old should have sued someone to carry weapons to 2nd grade. You're insane.

try walking into any federal building and not have to go through a security check, a metal detector. our politicians and our federal workers are well protected. but you can walk into a school totally unobstructed. and tell me this. after their kids were mowed down, when it came up for a vote, they still voted down protection and security at the schools.

 

[candycorn]

they should sue gun grabbers who have prevented them from protecting themselves. lets put the blame where it belongs

So the 5 year old should have sued someone to carry weapons to 2nd grade. You're insane.

try walking into any federal building and not have to go through a security check, a metal detector. our politicians and our federal workers are well protected. but you can walk into a school totally unobstructed. and tell me this. after their kids were mowed down, when it came up for a vote, they still voted down protection and security at the schools.

Now we're talking about federal buildings...; it literally never ends with you knuckleheads.

 

[Spoonman]

So the 5 year old should have sued someone to carry weapons to 2nd grade. You're insane.

try walking into any federal building and not have to go through a security check, a metal detector. our politicians and our federal workers are well protected. but you can walk into a school totally unobstructed. and tell me this. after their kids were mowed down, when it came up for a vote, they still voted down protection and security at the schools.

Now we're talking about federal buildings...; it literally never ends with you knuckleheads.

any state building too. who owns the schools? same people who own the government buildings. who pays their expenses? same taxes.

 

[candycorn]

try walking into any federal building and not have to go through a security check, a metal detector. our politicians and our federal workers are well protected. but you can walk into a school totally unobstructed. and tell me this. after their kids were mowed down, when it came up for a vote, they still voted down protection and security at the schools.

Now we're talking about federal buildings...; it literally never ends with you knuckleheads.

any state building too. who owns the schools? same people who own the government buildings. who pays their expenses? same taxes.

So the guard gets shot then the 20 kids get mowed down. Something should be built into the system to compensate the families for medical/final expenses? Still disgaree? Of course you do...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Day two So far no one was shot today.

 

[Spoonman]

Now we're talking about federal buildings...; it literally never ends with you knuckleheads.

any state building too. who owns the schools? same people who own the government buildings. who pays their expenses? same taxes.

So the guard gets shot then the 20 kids get mowed down. Something should be built into the system to compensate the families for medical/final expenses? Still disgaree? Of course you do...

or they security stops them and they don't get in the school. works on a daily basis in all the government buildings. but libs don't want to solve the problem. all they care about is pushing an agenda. why adopt an existing system that is already working. lets exploit a tragedy to push our agenda. gun grabbers are a blight on society. as usual you recommend something to provide relief AFTER the tragedy has already happened. Conservatives look to prevent it from ever happening

 

[candycorn]

any state building too. who owns the schools? same people who own the government buildings. who pays their expenses? same taxes.

So the guard gets shot then the 20 kids get mowed down. Something should be built into the system to compensate the families for medical/final expenses? Still disgaree? Of course you do...

or they security stops them and they don't get in the school. works on a daily basis in all the government buildings. but libs don't want to solve the problem. all they care about is pushing an agenda. why adopt an existing system that is already working. lets exploit a tragedy to push our agenda. gun grabbers are a blight on society. as usual you recommend something to provide relief AFTER the tragedy has already happened. Conservatives look to prevent it from ever happening

You simply won't answer the question...why are you so scared to come out and say the answer...you don't care about the victims of gun crime. Either that or answer the question...

 

[Spoonman]

So the guard gets shot then the 20 kids get mowed down. Something should be built into the system to compensate the families for medical/final expenses? Still disgaree? Of course you do...

or they security stops them and they don't get in the school. works on a daily basis in all the government buildings. but libs don't want to solve the problem. all they care about is pushing an agenda. why adopt an existing system that is already working. lets exploit a tragedy to push our agenda. gun grabbers are a blight on society. as usual you recommend something to provide relief AFTER the tragedy has already happened. Conservatives look to prevent it from ever happening

You simply won't answer the question...why are you so scared to come out and say the answer...you don't care about the victims of gun crime. Either that or answer the question...

yea I disagree with you. you aren't trying to fix the problem. you aren't trying to prevent the situation from happening. you will continue to allow kids to die as long as your agenda is met. pathetic

 

[candycorn]

or they security stops them and they don't get in the school. works on a daily basis in all the government buildings. but libs don't want to solve the problem. all they care about is pushing an agenda. why adopt an existing system that is already working. lets exploit a tragedy to push our agenda. gun grabbers are a blight on society. as usual you recommend something to provide relief AFTER the tragedy has already happened. Conservatives look to prevent it from ever happening

You simply won't answer the question...why are you so scared to come out and say the answer...you don't care about the victims of gun crime. Either that or answer the question...

yea I disagree with you. you aren't trying to fix the problem. you aren't trying to prevent the situation from happening. you will continue to allow kids to die as long as your agenda is met. pathetic

Fix the problem? I'm all for having armed guards in schools--what YOU said we need fuckwad--as long as they are not teachers. Teachers should teach, guards should be concerned with security.

A liability policy would, at least, compensate the injured to some degree. You disagree that there should be something built in? So if you were to get shot tomorrow, here is your scenario...here is what you want to happen.

You get shot and maybe you live. If you do, you go to the ER. Thats about $3,800 if you're not admitted and discharged. If you're admitted, you're looking at upwards of $10,000. Now you likely have insurance so you're "only" out about $4,000 of that if you have good to moderate insurance and do not need post discharge specialists. If you do, you could be looking at and extra $400 a month in therapy alone not to mention drugs.

But you're for no compensation being due to you so to get ANY relief from the gunman, you have to hire a lawyer ($$$) and sue the guy. Most likely, the guy who shot you isn't flush with cash or assets so you sue the guy and he's found guilty. So the court has to liquidate his assets to try to compensate you. Do you think you're going to get anywhere near what you're due? Do you think your bills (you're also paying your utilities during this period of having to pay for drugs and therapy) are going to wait for a court judgment and forced sale?

You make the gun owner have liability insurance and maybe they do, maybe they dont. Let's say they don't. You're no worse off than you would be if the law were not on the books. But there is a 50/50 chance that he may. Perhaps you were caught in the cross-fire or were accidentally hit by the law abiding citizen who was aiming at someone else...or he was cleaning his gun or whatever.

The liability insurance is a game changer. And yet you're for making those who are shot take a much more difficult road--one that would be difficult without pain and suffering--because you're mind-fucked by some phony baloney liberal/conservative argument as if the bullet cares that you're of some sort of political bend.

Lets say you weren't shot but in a car wreck and suffered the same degree of injuries. You would be able to sue the automobile owner and cash in on his auto-liability insurance. Amazingly, you see no political argument there but christ, when you talk about firearms, some bullshit that you were fed by talk radio comes to the surface and shazam! we have a controversy.

Pathetic.

 

[jon_berzerk]

lets see how connecticut votes in the next elections

Its in the Democratic column already.

Not one person in that line will be voting democrat. democrats own guns too and this has pushed them against democratic leaders. wonder why you couldn't even exploit the deaths of school kids? because people let their politicians know they would be voted out. the only thing in the democratic column is lost seats.

i cant imagine they would but after all they are democrats