Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 71,740
- 58,558
- 3,615
BZZZZZZT!Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
It is true.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BZZZZZZT!Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
The above makes me sad.Not all of us believe in an unregulated First Amendment. Some of us believe it needs to be highly regulated and restrict.
So the Capitol police should have been mowing them down?You can call them whatever you want but people have a protected Constitutionally acknowledged right to assemble.
PEACEABLY!!!! The moment they’re not 100% peaceable they need to be slaughtered like sheep.
Just because conservatives oppose the content and message of the protest doesn’t render that protest ‘unlawful.’" And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting. "
Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
We call them unlawful assemblies, and if those people who don't want you protesting are the cops yes they can.
Nobody had a problem with the protest. They problem came when they staged an insurgency.Why can't that MLK quote be applied to the protestors at the nation's capital last January? Wrong protest?
" And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting. "
Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
We call them unlawful assemblies, and if those people who don't want you protesting are the cops yes they can.
You can call them whatever you want but people have a protected Constitutionally acknowledged right to assemble.
We do not have an absolute right to assembly, have never had it
We just shut down over the rona and you think they can't shut down a protest? lol
No. The Constitution specifically states to peacefully assemble." And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting. "
Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
We call them unlawful assemblies, and if those people who don't want you protesting are the cops yes they can.
You can call them whatever you want but people have a protected Constitutionally acknowledged right to assemble.
We have a constitutional right to peaceably assemble. Once they start flinging poo like the chimps that they are, it is no longer a peaceful assembly, it's an unlawful assembly." And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting. "
Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
We call them unlawful assemblies, and if those people who don't want you protesting are the cops yes they can.
You can call them whatever you want but people have a protected Constitutionally acknowledged right to assemble.
Blocking the roads is unlawful.
Lockdown orders are a violation of the constitutional right to peaceably assemble. Breaking up a riot is not a violation.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy.Why can't that MLK quote be applied to the protestors at the nation's capital last January? Wrong protest?
Were they "mostly peaceful protests"?Read the article. This judge was addressing the police run amok during peaceful protests.
That's as lie. It was a riot.We have a constitutional right to peaceably assemble. Once they start flinging poo like the chimps that they are, it is no longer a peaceful assembly, it's an unlawful assembly." And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting. "
Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
We call them unlawful assemblies, and if those people who don't want you protesting are the cops yes they can.
You can call them whatever you want but people have a protected Constitutionally acknowledged right to assemble.
Blocking the roads is unlawful.
Lockdown orders are a violation of the constitutional right to peaceably assemble. Breaking up a riot is not a violation.
Read the article. This judge was addressing the police run amok during peaceful protests.
And not because conservatives are hostile to Americans of color engaging in protest, not because conservatives are hostile to the message of Americans of color needlessly dying while in police custody, and not because conservatives perceive lawful, peaceful protest as undermining the conservative partisan agenda.And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting.
Was the judge there or did he see it on CNN?Were they "mostly peaceful protests"?Read the article. This judge was addressing the police run amok during peaceful protests.
The article notes they were peaceful protests. The judge notes they were peaceful protests.
" And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting. "
Is this judge retarded or what? Because that's obviously not true
We call them unlawful assemblies, and if those people who don't want you protesting are the cops yes they can.
Algenon Marbley, chief judge for the Southern District of Ohio, began his 88 page opinion with a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr.: "But somewhere I read of the freedom of assembly. Somewhere I read of the freedom of speech. Somewhere I read of the freedom of press. Somewhere I read that the greatness of America is the right to protest for rights."
"Unfortunately, some of the members of the Columbus Police Department had no regard for the rights secured by this bedrock principle of American democracy," Marbley wrote. "This case is the sad tale of police officers, clothed with the awesome power of the state, run amok."
I also must note this as it's something I've long argued.
And officers must recognize that people displaying “press,” “media,” “reporter,” “paramedic,” “medic,” “legal observer,” or similar words or symbols are allowed to record at protests and help protesters who appear to be injured, the judge ruled. Further, anyone can record at a protest.
The courts have ruled over and over and over that anyone in public has a right to record the actions of the police. One day they will learn this. Until then taxpayers will be on the hook for millions of dollars for the violation of people's civil rights by the police.
And lastly, police can not force people to "disperse" simply because someone does not want the protesters protesting.
Federal judge says Columbus police ran 'amok' during peaceful protests
The debate must encompass more than just the issue of police misconduct; it must address Republican elected officials using law enforcement in violation of the First Amendment in an effort to silence protest by the political opposition.This judge was addressing the police run amok during peaceful protests.