Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,513
- 2,288
Hmmmmmmm.
From the link:
Hard to argue with that. Would even the most block-headed of liberals argue that getting this behind us isn't the most positive outcome? If we can do it early, why wouldn't we? Why should we wait?
What I see here is an absence of the drug having a negative effect. We can't know which people will benefit from the drug, but we can probably conclude that it's not going to hurt someone. It would be akin to taking an aspirin when you don't have a headache. Prescribe the medication and then monitor, closely, those it's been given to.
Oh, and someone needs to smack Tavia Golonski in the head with a phone book...
From the link:
“I’m not looking at it one way or another. But we want to get out of this. If it does work, it would be a shame if we didn’t do it early.”
Hard to argue with that. Would even the most block-headed of liberals argue that getting this behind us isn't the most positive outcome? If we can do it early, why wouldn't we? Why should we wait?
“There have been cases that show there may be an effect, and there are others to show there’s no effect.”
What I see here is an absence of the drug having a negative effect. We can't know which people will benefit from the drug, but we can probably conclude that it's not going to hurt someone. It would be akin to taking an aspirin when you don't have a headache. Prescribe the medication and then monitor, closely, those it's been given to.
Oh, and someone needs to smack Tavia Golonski in the head with a phone book...