Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice way to support a pedophile, his daughter said inappropriate showers. But you say nope, whatever happened to believing the woman?He isn't a pedophile if he hasn't been convicted except by partison declaration.
I guess it depends on how old she was and the context.
What I do know is that everyone who takes a shower with one of their very young kids is not a pedophile.
It seems less dubious then an actual convicted sexual assaulter. Does that mean everyone who supports someone convicted of sexual assault is a sexual assaulter? Is the entire right wing a bunch of sexual assaulters?
Inappropriate showers dumbass.All I did was ask where the sexual assault was in the diary, it is evident there is no such portion in the diary
The rest is yer mental disability on display.
When you stick up for a pedophile it is about you. A sick you.This is not about me.
Well I never took inappropriate showers with any minors in my entire life. I guess liberals do it all the time by the way you're excusing this behavior.Great, let's see either your proof they had sex or proof that you're an idiot...
She said probably inappropriate.Nice way to support a pedophile, his daughter said inappropriate showers. But you say nope, whatever happened to believing the woman?
Well I never took inappropriate showers with any minors in my entire life. I guess liberals do it all the time by the way you're excusing this behavior.
I started this thread. As far as I can tell you still deny the diary and it's contents are real.You obviously have not kept up on the thread, as much of this has been discussed already.
Not a criticism so much because it isn't practical to expect everyone to read through a larger forum before posting but just saying...you may want to go back a few pages if you want to add something new.
As I have expressed multiple times.I started this thread. As far as I can tell you still deny the diary and it's contents are real.
Yes she did abandon the materials which were later found and never “stolen”. The finder had Zero obligation to launch a search partyNope
Ashley Biden was moving out of a friend's Delray Beach home in spring 2020 when she stored the diary, tax records, a digital device with family photos, a cellphone and other items there, prosecutors said in a court filing.
They said [Aimee] Harris then moved into the same room, found the items and got in touch with [Robert] Kurlander, who enthused in a text message that he would help her make a "ton of money" from selling it, adding an expletive before "ton."
finders keepers losers weepers![]()
It’s a default for wishers that thinkers see, hear and read things incorrectly. Safe spacing sort of stuff.I started this thread. As far as I can tell you still deny the diary and it's contents are real.
As I have expressed multiple times.
Yes. Ashley's diary was stolen and was made available to the public for a brief time.
That doesn't mean that any yellow piece of paper posted online claiming to be a page of Ashley's diary is authentic.

Yeah. I'm not sure why you were confused either.
When you leave it behind, it hasn’t been stolen. Stealing is taking from me that which I possess.Yeah. I'm not sure why you were confused either.
I am patient though. Hope you got it this time.
Sorry. The courts disagree with you.When you leave it behind, it hasn’t been stolen. Stealing is taking from me that which I possess.
NopeSorry. The courts disagree with you.
So does common sense but that seems to be scarce these days.
The law says otherwise.Yes she did abandon the materials which were later found and never “stolen”. The finder had Zero obligation to launch a search party
It’s also entirely possible if not likely that Ashley could not bear to release the info and felt this was a way to get the word out
We know you feel strongly that people are legally obligated to track down on items left behind but there is no such lawThe law says otherwise.