OH SNAP! 'House Intelligence Chair: ‘No Proof’ Russians Were Trying To Get Trump Elected'

[JimBowie1958]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

Well again, the FBI did not look at the DNC servers. So how can they say it was hacked? OMG

True, and raises the question of why the USIC was violating their own charters by digging into domestic espionage cases that are the sole purview of the FBI, no?

But the email systems were hacked with simply phishing attacks in the case of Podesta and who knows how they got into the DNC but it was not a secure system.

The ELECTION ITSELF was not hacked and these idiots cannot distinguish between the two separate things.

 

[jc456]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

Well again, the FBI did not look at the DNC servers. So how can they say it was hacked? OMG

True, and raises the question of why the USIC was violating their own charters by digging into domestic espionage cases that are the sole purview of the FBI, no?

But the email systems were hacked with simply phishing attacks in the case of Podesta and who knows how they got into the DNC but it was not a secure system.

The ELECTION ITSELF was not hacked and these idiots cannot distinguish between the two separate things.

That's exactly right.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

Well again, the FBI did not look at the DNC servers. So how can they say it was hacked? OMG

They just KNOW, just like without actually investigating the computers they know what code was on them and who logged into them.

 

[Campbell]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

Did Putin Direct Russian Hacking? And Other Big Questions


Updated on January 5, 2017

"Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Thursday: “Every American should be alarmed by Russia’s attacks on our nation.” The remarks were made in his opening statement at a hearing on foreign cyberthreats to the U.S. in which senior U.S. intelligence officials testified about the role Russia played in the U.S. election. (Our blog of the hearing is here)"

 

[Boss]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

 

[Campbell]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

Ol' Friend.....you're either ignorant or you're a goddamned liar. A fool can see the tax cuts and what they caused:

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[jc456]

So, can one of you bright libturds explain how the intelligence agency found hacking on the DNC servers when the DNC states no one looked at them? How is that possible to find a user in a system one doesn't look at? Are you all saying our intelligence agencies use magic?

 

[hadit]

I read the news report all it says is that he claimed that because state run TV was against the US it was an attempt to interfere in our election, guess what? We do the same with State run programs all over the world.

What part of 'the hacking was only one part of it' is too hard for you to understand?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

What part of all he said was state run TV was against us don't you get?

What does that have to do with the Russian hacking Clapper specifically notes?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

Why don't you care that Russia tried to hack our election?

He provide no actual multiple forms of attack other then claiming they ran TV programs against us On GASP State run TV.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Why don't you care whether Russia tried to hack our election?

Define "hack". Seeing as you can hack into electronic data stores or communications and you can't "hack" an election, what exactly do you think happened? Do you have a real idea or are you just parroting an emotional term you heard somewhere?

 

[hadit]

So, can one of you bright libturds explain how the intelligence agency found hacking on the DNC servers when the DNC states no one looked at them? How is that possible to find a user in a system one doesn't look at? Are you all saying our intelligence agencies use magic?

Kind of puts Hillary's cavalier approach to email security in a new light, doesn't it?

 

[Boss]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

Ol' Friend.....you're either ignorant or you're a goddamned liar. A fool can see the tax cuts and what they caused:

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

You are STILL trying to leap from the tax cuts to the debt. The debt increase was the result of spending, not the tax cuts!

Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

Tax revenues:
1980 - $517.1 bil
1988 - $909.2 bil
a 78.5% increase.

Reagan's tax cuts INCREASED tax revenues! The DEBT increased due to spending.... nothing to do with tax revenues.

 

[Campbell]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

Ol' Friend.....you're either ignorant or you're a goddamned liar. A fool can see the tax cuts and what they caused:

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

You are STILL trying to leap from the tax cuts to the debt. The debt increase was the result of spending, not the tax cuts!

Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

Tax revenues:
1980 - $517.1 bil
1988 - $909.2 bil
a 78.5% increase.

Reagan's tax cuts INCREASED tax revenues! The DEBT increased due to spending.... nothing to do with tax revenues.

Horse shit.....an idiot knows that tax cuts mean less income. If one is in debt less income is a No No.....or don't you have enough sense to understand that?


These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[Boss]

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

The Republicans did not control Congress from 1980-1988... the Democrats did! They REFUSED to cut spending! Reagan advocated for a Balanced Budget Amendment and Line Item Veto.

Reagan: 1984 State of the Union Address-

 

[Boss]

Horse shit.....an idiot knows that tax cuts mean less income.

Nope... I just posted the actual figures from the Treasury Dept.

Tax revenues:
1980 - $517.1 bil
1988 - $909.2 bil
a 78.5% increase.

You having trouble reading that?
You have trouble with MATH?

 

[Boss]

These figures came from the bureau of the debt...

I've not disputed the debt, idiot.

I reject the notion that tax cuts contributed when the tax cuts generated more tax revenue. The debt grew because the Democrat congress refused to make spending cuts. If Reagan hadn't increased tax revenues the debt would have been more.

 

[Boss]

an idiot knows that tax cuts mean less income.

But that's just not true and it has been proven. If you're a stupid liberal who doesn't understand that we don't live in a vacuum, it's easy to believe that cutting tax rates produce less revenue... I get that. But we don't live in a vacuum and things aren't static. When you cut top marginal tax rates it generates more economic growth and creates more jobs with more taxpayers... the tax revenues actually increase.

So pull your head out of your ass and try to understand the world you live in is more complex than you thought.

 

[Campbell]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

Ol' Friend.....you're either ignorant or you're a goddamned liar. A fool can see the tax cuts and what they caused:

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

You are STILL trying to leap from the tax cuts to the debt. The debt increase was the result of spending, not the tax cuts!

Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

Tax revenues:
1980 - $517.1 bil
1988 - $909.2 bil
a 78.5% increase.

Reagan's tax cuts INCREASED tax revenues! The DEBT increased due to spending.... nothing to do with tax revenues.

Listen you dumbass......the Republicans cut tax rates and continued to spend at an increasing rate. If that doesn't ring your bell you don't have one. LESS INCOME.......MORE DEBT!!! DUUUUUUUHH

 

[jc456]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

Ol' Friend.....you're either ignorant or you're a goddamned liar. A fool can see the tax cuts and what they caused:

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

so you didn't go to the Treasury Department web site and see the revenues? It's the revenue's, not the debt. The debt is associated with spending. you should get a job, by a house and manage a checkbook once in your life to understand how life works.

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

Did Putin Direct Russian Hacking? And Other Big Questions


Updated on January 5, 2017

"Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Thursday: “Every American should be alarmed by Russia’s attacks on our nation.” The remarks were made in his opening statement at a hearing on foreign cyberthreats to the U.S. in which senior U.S. intelligence officials testified about the role Russia played in the U.S. election. (Our blog of the hearing is here)"

dude, they never looked at the servers!!!!! The DNC said so!!! phishing is what happened. That is someone receiving an email and clicking it and responding to it. that ain't hacking.

BTW, to include the phrase about interfering with the elections, well no one has produced anything to suggest that was even true.

 

[JimBowie1958]

"Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Thursday: “Every American should be alarmed by Russia’s attacks on our nation.” The remarks were made in his opening statement at a hearing on foreign cyberthreats to the U.S. in which senior U.S. intelligence officials testified about the role Russia played in the U.S. election. (Our blog of the hearing is here)"

dude, they never looked at the servers!!!!! The DNC said so!!! phishing is what happened. That is someone receiving an email and clicking it and responding to it. that ain't hacking.

You still think that this nonsense has a damned thing to do with Facts and the use of Reason?

Puhleeeeze!

 

[Boss]

Listen you dumbass......the Republicans cut tax rates and continued to spend at an increasing rate. If that doesn't ring your bell you don't have one. LESS INCOME.......MORE DEBT!!! DUUUUUUUHH

1) Republicans didn't control congress, Democrats did.
2) We increased income by 78.5% by cutting taxes.
3) More debt was the result of spending, not tax cuts.

 

[dannyboys]

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

The DEBT increased because SPENDING increased... it had NOTHING to do with the tax cuts! You can go look at the US Treasury Dept. website and see the tax revenue numbers ROSE 78.5% under Reagan. We INCREASED tax revenues!

And it wasn't "tax cuts for the rich" it was tax cuts on the top marginal wage earners... the RICH don't pay income taxes because very few of them earn taxable incomes. Most of their earnings is investment income. The tax cuts went to the small businessmen who are trying to become rich.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

Because we had a Democrat congress that REFUSED to cut SPENDING!

Ol' Friend.....you're either ignorant or you're a goddamned liar. A fool can see the tax cuts and what they caused:

The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:

These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:


.....................................................................Total Debt...............................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75 (80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49 (Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 (First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 (Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 (First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)(Clinton raised tax rates early 1993)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00 (Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion) (Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

You are STILL trying to leap from the tax cuts to the debt. The debt increase was the result of spending, not the tax cuts!

Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

Tax revenues:
1980 - $517.1 bil
1988 - $909.2 bil
a 78.5% increase.

Reagan's tax cuts INCREASED tax revenues! The DEBT increased due to spending.... nothing to do with tax revenues.

Listen you dumbass......the Republicans cut tax rates and continued to spend at an increasing rate. If that doesn't ring your bell you don't have one. LESS INCOME.......MORE DEBT!!! DUUUUUUUHH

Why can't you assholes stick to the thread subject?
**** off and start a 'tax' thread!