OH SNAP! 'House Intelligence Chair: ‘No Proof’ Russians Were Trying To Get Trump Elected'

[Boss]

Those women are content in knowing that Trump lied when he said he was going to sue them all.

And of course the sane among us know exactly WHY Trump isn't going to sue any of them.

Ohhhh...... ho hooo..... The Libtard quickly runs away from the topic and wants to talk about the ***** grabber! Nice move, libtard! It won't work, but hey... you had to give it a shot, right?

 

[Campbell]

It's not a crock of anything just because you don't understand it or see the reason why it exists...or because Hillary lost.

I understand that if 3,000,000+ more American citizens wanted Hillary Clinton than did Donald Trump.......Trump should be the president????? The electoral college was enacted when folks had to ride a horse or buggy to a place to vote. In case you haven't noticed now a person can leave NY in the morning and make a meeting in LA the next morning. The outdated electoral college should be superceded with a modern method of voting. There's nothing you can say which might justify the loser of an election becoming the winner. What happened to a "Show of Hands?"

If you believe the LIB 'man-bun' dopers their female 'snowflake' coastal elites should choose the President you are delusional.
For Christ's sake you assholes can't tie a ******* shoelace.

If I was standing about four feet from your useless ass I could harelip you!

 

[Fueri]

wasn't it back in 2015? how is it that affected 2016's election? you all forgot to work on the timeline.

Where did James Clapper mention 2015?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

that came out in the other report from the 30th. didn't you read that one? it was posted in here about 100 times. "summer of 2015" So putin wanted trump to win back in the summer of 2015. wow.

This was from testimony today

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

so the russians aren't allowed to present propaganda? why? Why is it CNN is allowed to?

BTW, who collected the 12 women supposedly groped by trump, it wasn't the russians. who did that and where are those women today?

Those women are content in knowing that Trump lied when he said he was going to sue them all.

And of course the sane among us know exactly WHY Trump isn't going to sue any of them.

Sometimes the 'funny' button just don't come close to covering it.....

 

[Campbell]

Those women are content in knowing that Trump lied when he said he was going to sue them all.

And of course the sane among us know exactly WHY Trump isn't going to sue any of them.

Ohhhh...... ho hooo..... The Libtard quickly runs away from the topic and wants to talk about the ***** grabber! Nice move, libtard! It won't work, but hey... you had to give it a shot, right?

Well before the next four years is over the American people will hate dick face. He was born into riches, had everything he wanted and never has experienced the plight of an ordinary family trying to educate their family. He will fall flat on his ugly face!

He's already talking about tax cuts for the upper 1% and corporations. That's the only thing Republicans have stood for since Reagan. You remember his tax cuts don't you? A new Mercedes each year for the upper crust and enough for an average family to buy a muffler for one. My wife and I benefitted about $200 a year. I might also point out that Reagan quadrupled the national debt:

..............................................Total U S Debt................................................

Figures Easily Verified....Taken From the Bureau of the Debt

US: $18,775,084,981,440 - Debt as of December 2015?

09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82

09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32

09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89

09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15

09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48

09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23

09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50

09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62

09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34

09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73

09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39

09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton Raised Taxes On The Rich early 1993)

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66

09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03

09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25

09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32

09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16

09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00

09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42

09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00

09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00

09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[kwc57]

Why is it that...

BEFORE the election all of you Trumpbots were so excited about the revealing of the hacked emails because you were sure they would bring Hillary Clinton down,

but now,

AFTER the election and the revelation that the Russians were in on it, you all have decided that oh no!
those hacked emails couldn't possibly have influenced the election. No way!

you people are a big fat joke.

there was never anything about hacked emails. there were leaked emails. and as for the 30,000 emails, that would have been from around 2013 when they were unlawfully deleted and were supposed to be in the FBI's hands, have made their way to the FBI is just cheaters proof.

"Never anything about hacked emails."

Oh my ******* Jesus. See what I mean?

They were not hacked. They were phished......meaning that the account owner was stupid enough to fall for a trick and provide their password so someone else could access the account. Phishing and hacking are two entirely different things. Accuracy counts.

 

[Boss]

Well before the next four years is over the American people will hate dick face.

Yeaaaahhh... given your track record on predicting when the American people will turn on Trump, I don't think I'll hold my breath.

 

[Boss]

He's already talking about tax cuts for the upper 1% and corporations.

That's a GOOD thing. When Reagan cut the top marginal tax rates it increased the tax revenues 78.5%

I might also point out that Reagan quadrupled the national debt:

Well, you can point out whatever you like but that's a lie. Reagan didn't do that... the US Congress is responsible for spending. Reagan requested the line item veto so he could reign in spending and the Democrats refused to give him that tool. He also advocated strongly for a Balanced Budget Amendment. He also vetoed 78 assorted spending and appropriation bills during his 8 years.

I realize most of you libtarded mush-brains weren't even alive when Reagan was president and your socialists masters won't tell you the facts.

 

[Campbell]

He's already talking about tax cuts for the upper 1% and corporations.

That's a GOOD thing. When Reagan cut the top marginal tax rates it increased the tax revenues 78.5%

I might also point out that Reagan quadrupled the national debt:

Well, you can point out whatever you like but that's a lie. Reagan didn't do that... the US Congress is responsible for spending. Reagan requested the line item veto so he could reign in spending and the Democrats refused to give him that tool. He also advocated strongly for a Balanced Budget Amendment. He also vetoed 78 assorted spending and appropriation bills during his 8 years.

I realize most of you libtarded mush-brains weren't even alive when Reagan was president and your socialists masters won't tell you the facts.

Horse Shit.........You Wish!

Every time we had tax cuts for the rich the national debt increased proportionately. Think about it for a minute.........it's not rocket science.

 

[Campbell]

He's already talking about tax cuts for the upper 1% and corporations.

That's a GOOD thing. When Reagan cut the top marginal tax rates it increased the tax revenues 78.5%

I might also point out that Reagan quadrupled the national debt:

Well, you can point out whatever you like but that's a lie. Reagan didn't do that... the US Congress is responsible for spending. Reagan requested the line item veto so he could reign in spending and the Democrats refused to give him that tool. He also advocated strongly for a Balanced Budget Amendment. He also vetoed 78 assorted spending and appropriation bills during his 8 years.

I realize most of you libtarded mush-brains weren't even alive when Reagan was president and your socialists masters won't tell you the facts.

Horse shit! Damn funny things were fine and the national debt was about $1 trillion when Reagan started.......$4 trillion when he finished.

 

[Syriusly]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

 

[Syriusly]

What does that have to do with the Russian hacking Clapper specifically notes?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

Why don't you care that Russia tried to hack our election?

wasn't it back in 2015? how is it that affected 2016's election? you all forgot to work on the timeline.

Where did James Clapper mention 2015?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

that came out in the other report from the 30th. didn't you read that one? it was posted in here about 100 times. "summer of 2015" So putin wanted trump to win back in the summer of 2015. wow.

This was from testimony today

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

so the russians aren't allowed to present propaganda? why? Why is it CNN is allowed to?
?

Russians can present propaganda however they want- they do it all the time. Of course most Americans don't equate Russia to CNN, but hey, I get it- you have to defend Russia.

James Clapper was talking about how Russia tried to hack our election- as part of their overall campaign.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news.

 

[Campbell]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

 

[jc456]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Huh? How?

 

[Syriusly]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Huh? How?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

 

[jc456]

wasn't it back in 2015? how is it that affected 2016's election? you all forgot to work on the timeline.

Where did James Clapper mention 2015?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

that came out in the other report from the 30th. didn't you read that one? it was posted in here about 100 times. "summer of 2015" So putin wanted trump to win back in the summer of 2015. wow.

This was from testimony today

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

so the russians aren't allowed to present propaganda? why? Why is it CNN is allowed to?
?

Russians can present propaganda however they want- they do it all the time. Of course most Americans don't equate Russia to CNN, but hey, I get it- you have to defend Russia.

James Clapper was talking about how Russia tried to hack our election- as part of their overall campaign.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news.

I do? How? Defend your statement fk!

 

[Syriusly]

Where did James Clapper mention 2015?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

that came out in the other report from the 30th. didn't you read that one? it was posted in here about 100 times. "summer of 2015" So putin wanted trump to win back in the summer of 2015. wow.

This was from testimony today

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

so the russians aren't allowed to present propaganda? why? Why is it CNN is allowed to?
?

Russians can present propaganda however they want- they do it all the time. Of course most Americans don't equate Russia to CNN, but hey, I get it- you have to defend Russia.

James Clapper was talking about how Russia tried to hack our election- as part of their overall campaign.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news.

I do? How? Defend your statement fk!

Russians can present propaganda however they want- they do it all the time. Of course most Americans don't equate Russia to CNN, but hey, I get it- you have to defend Russia.

James Clapper was talking about how Russia tried to hack our election- as part of their overall campaign.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Huh? How?

You have to drink the Kool Aid and lean your head way over to the left and squint pretty seriously, then maybe you can see how our elections might have been hacked.

roflmao, these libtards are just too easy as they cannot distinguish between hacking into an email system vrs hacking an entire election..

 

[JimBowie1958]

Where did James Clapper mention 2015?

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

that came out in the other report from the 30th. didn't you read that one? it was posted in here about 100 times. "summer of 2015" So putin wanted trump to win back in the summer of 2015. wow.

This was from testimony today

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

so the russians aren't allowed to present propaganda? why? Why is it CNN is allowed to?
?

Russians can present propaganda however they want- they do it all the time. Of course most Americans don't equate Russia to CNN, but hey, I get it- you have to defend Russia.

James Clapper was talking about how Russia tried to hack our election- as part of their overall campaign.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news.

I do? How? Defend your statement fk!

You 'defend Russia' by opposing the DNC talking points.

lol, Senator McCarthy is rolling in his grave at the sight of Marxists using Russia as a foil to delegitimize a duly elected President.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

 

[jc456]

Even if the Russians were the force behind the DNC hacked emails and Podesta's, it was not a HACK of our elections..

It certainly was Russia hacking to try to affect our elections.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the scope of the attack on the U.S. election: "This was a multifaceted campaign. So, the hacking was only one part of it and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news."

He says specifically that Russia tried to hack our election.

Just humor the stupid bastards. They couldn't pour piss from a boot with the instructions written on the heel.

No, Clapper said that the email systems were hacked, not that the elections were hacked, you stupid bastard.

Well again, the FBI did not look at the DNC servers. So how can they say it was hacked? OMG