Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

[WillowTree]

This bitch is a coach for the DNC.

 

[easyt65]

I would also like to see the order from Trump stopping the Ukrain funds as well. Where is that at?

I think the 'Whistle Blower' has it - he, the Easter Bunny, and Big Foot are holding on to all the 'evidence' that the Democrats have failed to present so far for safe keeping.

 

[The Original Tree]

Like I have said for the past three years, when you have Evil and Dishonest Intentions they usually blow up in your face.

Psalm 9:16-17

16 The LORD is known by the justice He brings; the wicked are ensnared by the work of their hands. Higgaion Selah 17 The wicked will return to Sheol—all the nations who forget God

When you have a rigged 10 month investigation that was run by Comey, and all it does is expose corruption in The Obama FBI and DOJ, and then you hand that off to Mueller for an additional 22 months of investigations, and it does nothing but expose further corruption in his own team, and then you move on to another dishonest proceeding, like we saw Adolph Schiffler had run with secret witnesses, secret testimony, secret meetings, and secret transcripts, and that too blows up in their faces, one can only expect the same to continue.

When you have a Star Witness hand selected by Jerry Nadler, and he tells you that he is not a supporter of the president, and that your case is woefully inadequate, and not only that is sets a "DANGEROUS" precedent, don't you think you should listen to him?

Impeachment legal case is ‘woefully inadequate,’ 'dangerous,' legal expert Turley testifies

An expert legal witness testified Wednesday that the current legal case for impeaching President Trump is “woefully inadequate” and “dangerous,” as the House Judiciary Committee holds its first impeachment inquiry hearing.

In his opening statement, Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University Law School, told lawmakers that, while he is not a "supporter" of the president, he is concerned about the “integrity” of the impeachment process based on the case being built against Trump.

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,” Turley said.

 

[bripat9643]

His opinion is there has not been an underlying commission of a crime and therefore impeachment is not warranted. He's wrong, but for now let's put aside his opinion on that issue.

How can he justify not impeaching Trump given the absolute certainty of his obstruction of the impeachment inquiry (and for that matter the Mueller investigation)?

Trump pursued his legal options. Appealing subpoenas is standard court procedure. What your saying is like saying hiring a lawyer is obstruction of justice.

The bottom line is that you're a fucking idiot.

Yes, as he always does he has pursued his legal options.........and will do so until they run out. So far, every court has ruled against his baseless arguments of absolute immunity and blanket privilege.

Then you admit he hasn't obstructed justice.

Thanks for playing.

 

[Meister]

A democrat that took leave of the plantation?

 

[Rambunctious]

You know what pisses me off?.....the next dem president will not face this kind of shit...the GOP just doesn't have it in them to fight this way....

Fighting them 'this way', as pointed out by Turley, is criminally dangerous to the Republic and all but makes them 'enemies of the state', willing to destroy , trample, and violate the Constitution, Americans' Rights, and the Rule of Law to re-acquire and hold on to power.

At the end of this, maybe sooner, instead of a desire to fight like 'this', I hope those doing so are held accountable - punished, sent to prison - to deter anyone or any party (the Democrats) from ever doing this again!

I hope you are right...I hope the dems take a beating and will never try this again....I said that after the Mueller testimony...and yet here we are....

 

[WillowTree]

Are the Republicans going to be allowed to ask questions?

 

[Rambunctious]

How long does this guy have the mic?....

 

[Auld Phart]

How long does this guy have the mic?....

45 minutes.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Some guy on Fox News who claims he is a conservative keeps telling Republicans that Trump should be impeached....

But yea, we should totally go along with what Turley said.....

 

[Auld Phart]

So far, it looks like Turley should have brought a pillow.

 

[Rambunctious]

How long does this guy have the mic?....

45 minutes.

 

[The Original Tree]

His opinion is there has not been an underlying commission of a crime and therefore impeachment is not warranted. He's wrong, but for now let's put aside his opinion on that issue.

How can he justify not impeaching Trump given the absolute certainty of his obstruction of the impeachment inquiry (and for that matter the Mueller investigation)?

What part of "Woefully Inadequate" do you not understand?

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,” Turley said.

Do you ignore the words "Woefully Inadequate" when you hear it in The Bedroom?

 

[Auld Phart]

When you have a Star Witness hand selected by Jerry Nadler,

Selected by the Republicans, not Nadler.

Why do you think he hasn't been involved in the questions by the Dem counsel?

They know they won't like his answers.

 

[Hellokitty]

Um, watching the impeachment hearing and it's a full TDS melt down by the 3 democrats legal experts.

• 

 

[ElmerMudd]

Constitutional scholars testify, before congress, that Trump's actions definitely warrant impeachment.
They warn that if Trump's actions do not warrant impeachment the intentions of the founders would be undermined.
The scholars main goal is to maintain the intentions of the Constitution. They are not advocates for Democrats or Republicans. They are advocates of our Constitution and our Democracy.

The source is the transcript of the congressional hearing

 

[WillowTree]

This is a democrat commercial at the taxpayers expense.

 

[Crixus]

So far, it looks like Turley should have brought a pillow.

Yup. They all are only there for looks anyway. They are not elected so what they say just doesn't matter. There is zero chance any bombshells come out of this. DNC will poll this Monday and impeach by the next Monday. Folks on either said may as well turn off the TV and go play.

 

[berg80]

His opinion is there has not been an underlying commission of a crime and therefore impeachment is not warranted. He's wrong, but for now let's put aside his opinion on that issue.

How can he justify not impeaching Trump given the absolute certainty of his obstruction of the impeachment inquiry (and for that matter the Mueller investigation)?

Trump pursued his legal options. Appealing subpoenas is standard court procedure. What your saying is like saying hiring a lawyer is obstruction of justice.

The bottom line is that you're a fucking idiot.

Yes, as he always does he has pursued his legal options.........and will do so until they run out. So far, every court has ruled against his baseless arguments of absolute immunity and blanket privilege.

Then you admit he hasn't obstructed justice.

Thanks for playing.

The opposite is true. You Trumpers really do have a reading comprehension problem.

 

[the other mike]

They're looking at 'obstruction of justice' now ? What a joke.