Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

[Slade3200]

Did you know the IMF made the same threat?

Are they a member nation in the UN?

.

Why does that matter?

If they're not, they wouldn't be bound by the UN charter, would they?

.

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

 

[MAGAman]

Um, they read the OPINIONS of other "witnesses" who heard the OPINIONS of other "witnesses"..............then gave their OPINIONS on those OPINIONS.

Such are the thing of coups.

 

[OKTexas]

Are they a member nation in the UN?

.

Why does that matter?

If they're not, they wouldn't be bound by the UN charter, would they?

.

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

This will go down in the history books as the "Great Failed Impeachment Coup"

 

[Crixus]

Watching a recorded version of the hearing and Bucks line of questioning. He asked Turley if the other three panelists would consider a list of other acts that other presidents did as an abuse of power under the same standards they are holding on Trump. The other three panelists were siting right there but instead of questioning them he just went off on his own rant pushing his narrative and using Turley as a nodding bobble head .... that was the most pathetic line of questioning I’ve seen yet.

the questions were actually good but he was too scared to actually question the people sitting right in front of him. #Weak

Pathetic, wasn't it? Turley was visibly uncomfortable. Sadly, he didn't find it in himself to retort, "With all due respect, Congressman, my esteemed colleagues are sitting right here, right next to me. So, if you want to hear their opinion on the matters you inquired, why not ask them? I'd also be interested in hearing them out."

Well, just as pathetic was the Democrats' determined effort to ignore Turley. Apparently there was just one with the guts to take him on, at least so far. In my view, they are doing this hearing a great disservice. Personally, I find Turley thoroughly disingenuous in his arguments, and would have loved to see them picked apart. So, they chose to let stand, basically unopposed, the charge there's a thin basis for impeachment, which would be further marred by lack of evidence. Disconcerting, that.

i agree... I don’t like the 3 on 1 and I don’t like how each side is using the witnesses to push their agenda instead of challenging them with questions and good debate.

I would love to see Turley and the guy on the left end have a sit down debate/discussion about it. Get these soapbox politicians out of the way.

Nadlers closing statement indicated the decision has already been made, so why the dog and pony show?

.

Because for three years democrat leadership has been telling a bunch of freshman congress critter that it will all be okay and to trust them.

I know it may seem like 3 years, but commiecrats have only been in leadership in the house less than a year.

.

Blah! Still a year to long!

 

[Slade3200]

Why does that matter?

If they're not, they wouldn't be bound by the UN charter, would they?

.

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

 

[Slade3200]

Why does that matter?

If they're not, they wouldn't be bound by the UN charter, would they?

.

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

Yeah we can self police anything we think is a threat... there is a process for that

 

[OKTexas]

If they're not, they wouldn't be bound by the UN charter, would they?

.

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

If they had felt pressure they would have announced an investigation, they didn't. Use your brain man.

.

 

[OKTexas]

If they're not, they wouldn't be bound by the UN charter, would they?

.

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

Yeah we can self police anything we think is a threat... there is a process for that

Yep, that's why Trump asked for cooperation with the AG on behalf of the American people, not himself. Neither you or any commie can provide a quote from trump where he asked for anything for himself, I challenged one twice in this thread and they ran like hell.

.

 

[Slade3200]

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

If they had felt pressure they would have announced an investigation, they didn't. Use your brain man.

.

you are joking right? You know they had one set up with CNN but canceled after the aid was released

 

[WEATHER53]

Sad time for America to see what a vindictive, sordid affair federal “service” has become. When did it become not about American people but all about politicians??

 

[Slade3200]

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

Yeah we can self police anything we think is a threat... there is a process for that

Yep, that's why Trump asked for cooperation with the AG on behalf of the American people, not himself. Neither you or any commie can provide a quote from trump where he asked for anything for himself, I challenged one twice in this thread and they ran like hell.

.

Unlike you I don’t need everything spelled out to know what’s going on. Unlike the Dems I think impeachment is a horrible idea.

 

[OKTexas]

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

If they had felt pressure they would have announced an investigation, they didn't. Use your brain man.

.

you are joking right? You know they had one set up with CNN but canceled after the aid was released

LMAO, they had all of Aug to make the announcement and you're saying the waited till mid Sep? Damn you're gullible.

.

 

[OKTexas]

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

Yeah we can self police anything we think is a threat... there is a process for that

Yep, that's why Trump asked for cooperation with the AG on behalf of the American people, not himself. Neither you or any commie can provide a quote from trump where he asked for anything for himself, I challenged one twice in this thread and they ran like hell.

.

Unlike you I don’t need everything spelled out to know what’s going on. Unlike the Dems I think impeachment is a horrible idea.

Evidently the commies need it spelled out, they can't read for themselves, they just parrot talking points, ie lies.

.

 

[Slade3200]

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

If they had felt pressure they would have announced an investigation, they didn't. Use your brain man.

.

you are joking right? You know they had one set up with CNN but canceled after the aid was released

LMAO, they had all of Aug to make the announcement and you're saying the waited till mid Sep? Damn you're gullible.

.

uh yeah. CNN interview.... canceled after whistler blower report. You just think that’s a neat coincidence?

 

[Care4all]

Oh sorry, your still on the UN charter... that’s right. Did the UN ever take issue with what we did?

And that would make a difference HOW? Ukraine didn't have an issue with what Trump said, doesn't make a bit of difference to the commies.

.

Maybe they did maybe they didn’t we would t know because they would never express that publicly.

I ask because you are saying that Biden broke the charter and asking if anybody who was part of the charter ever saw it that way

BS, they expressed just the opposite in public, TWICE. Also, are you saying we can only self police republicans and not the commies?

.

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

If they had felt pressure they would have announced an investigation, they didn't. Use your brain man.

.

they did make the announcement.

 

[MAGAman]

No shit. If they had felt pressure there is no way they would publicly say that. Come on man, use your brain, you don’t bite the hand that feeds

Brilliant.

First we must assume Trump said something nobody witnessed him saying.

Second we must must assume somebody felt pressure because they said they didn't.

It doesn't take Perry Mason to defend against that.

 

[MAGAman]

They are all constitutional scholars with impeccable credentials.

The 3 haters are Democrat Party activists.

The 1 that is possibly identifying as a female is such a TDS nutjob it crosses the street to keep from walking in front of Trump property.

You didn't really think the 3 haters were picked for their expertise did you? Want to buy a bridge?

 

[hadit]

Watching a recorded version of the hearing and Bucks line of questioning. He asked Turley if the other three panelists would consider a list of other acts that other presidents did as an abuse of power under the same standards they are holding on Trump. The other three panelists were siting right there but instead of questioning them he just went off on his own rant pushing his narrative and using Turley as a nodding bobble head .... that was the most pathetic line of questioning I’ve seen yet.

the questions were actually good but he was too scared to actually question the people sitting right in front of him. #Weak

Pathetic, wasn't it? Turley was visibly uncomfortable. Sadly, he didn't find it in himself to retort, "With all due respect, Congressman, my esteemed colleagues are sitting right here, right next to me. So, if you want to hear their opinion on the matters you inquired, why not ask them? I'd also be interested in hearing them out."

Well, just as pathetic was the Democrats' determined effort to ignore Turley. Apparently there was just one with the guts to take him on, at least so far. In my view, they are doing this hearing a great disservice. Personally, I find Turley thoroughly disingenuous in his arguments, and would have loved to see them picked apart. So, they chose to let stand, basically unopposed, the charge there's a thin basis for impeachment, which would be further marred by lack of evidence. Disconcerting, that.

i agree... I don’t like the 3 on 1 and I don’t like how each side is using the witnesses to push their agenda instead of challenging them with questions and good debate.

I would love to see Turley and the guy on the left end have a sit down debate/discussion about it. Get these soapbox politicians out of the way.

You mean the guy on the left who said trump should be impeached for a naughty tweet? You missed Turlys point all along and not just for today. His point is t that trump is awesome. Matter of fact, Turly ain't even a trump guy. He was correct in saying that this is nothing but people who are mad being mad, and that impeaching a presidant because he is a poopy face is not a good idea, even though it's doable. This should worry the hell out of you, and it would if you could see past the TDS. Look, one day a democrat will be presidant. That's a fact. One day the republicans will have a house full of crazy fuckers equivelant to AOC and her squad. What will you say when they impeach that presidant?

That is the exact same bullshit defense Turley gave when he represented Thomas Porteous in his impeachment in 2010. It didn't prevent Porteous from being kicked out of office then, but the GOP still had some integrity back then. As far as the house being full of crazy repub fuckers, they impeached Clinton for a consensual blowjob.

Boy, I'm glad they didn't do that. That would be bad.

 

[easyt65]

Live Now
CLASS IN SESSION
'Professors take America to law school as impeachment hearing turns academic'

The elitist Liberal Self-Proclaimed Constitutional Experts who infest College / universities - like Barry's domestic terrorist buddy Bill Ayers - are seeking to prove they are smarter than the American people while justifying their classroom liberal indoctrination and oppression / abuse of students who reject their liberal ideology and agendas.

Libtard Stanford Law Professor Pamela Karlan demonstrated why 'snowflakes' are called 'snowflakes, becoming easily offended and almost running out of the hearing room headed for her 'Safe Space' when R-Doug Collins pointed out the FACT that none of the Democrats' / Nadler's 'witnesses' testifying before the committee today are actually 'witnesses, that they are Liberal Law professors brought in to give their biased political OPINIONS:

"House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., criticized Wednesday’s impeachment hearing during his opening statement by noting that it does not include any fact witnesses, just law professors who will likely only theorize about impeaching President Trump because they were too busy to digest all of the facts at issue."

Impeachment witness snaps at Doug Collins during hearing, tells him she’s ‘insulted’ by comments

Bullshit. She effectively told that bumbling idiot Collins that she read the transcripts and was prepared.

Yes, she claimed she read the transcript...she also said she was not biased....but that got shot to hell, too, when her remark about Trump's hotel was read and when she brought up the President's child. She was exposed as a biased, hate-driven Liberal Progressive Socialist Extremist University Indoctrinator. The only people who think anything she said was worth a crap after that was fellow Trump-hating snowflakes.