PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #41
I can see jokes now, Germanwings, one way tickets only.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Driving is more dangerous.guess that all the air travelers are going to be concerned ehh !! Me , I just won't fly , I prefer driving anyway .
And a dedicated to the cause suicide/murderer will find a way around that too, in time.put the lavatory in the cockpit or make it 3 person in the cockpit in case one pilot needs to walk away from the cockpit .
Absolutely an option, I would think.
Perhaps you would care to comment on the fact that Obama is hell bent on destroying Israel? And that you continue to support him.Thank you for this. Our lunatic fringe seems to have already decided he was a member of ISIS on a mission.
But that's what makes them the lunatic fringe.
Furthermore - we certainly have the technology to prevent anyone but the pilot to pilot the plane.
No 1 has already been explained:
Pilots AND cabin crew have the code to unlock the cockpit. Only, a person inside the cockpit can lock that code out for a time period of 5 minutes, ergo, Lubitz locked out the attempt to give a code at least twice.
I think that is a very bad policy.
I would think the pilot of the airplane would have an override ability.
Dumb.
You mean a pilot outside of the cockpit?
Hmmm, for this very reason, they have that system, to keep a terrorist from forcing a pilot or co-pilot from entering the code. The negation of such a code from the inside would be the method of last resort. Apparently, no one ever thought that a co-pilot might want to use the "negate" method to commit suicide/multiple homocide.
No, I mean that the pilot, or as we call them in America - the Captain, is the only person who has an overide.
Or that crew members could contact the airline and they could overide the code from within. Without this, a terrorist once in the cockpit can easily prevent anyone else from getting in. That is not a great thing.
As well as we certainly, and easily have the technology to prevent someone from taking controls that is not the pilot. For instance a crew member contacts the airline, and the airline can lock the controls and instruct the plane to maintain a desired height. A terrorist takes over, but the controls lock him out.
Oh, I think that your idea is essentially a good one. But according to FAA regs and also European aviation regs, only registered and licensed pilots can transmit, and the main booster in order to sent the signal is usually on top of the cockpit, if memory serves.
This incident may cause a number of lawmakers and airplane architects to re-think some things.
For instance, in the big birds, there is often a crawl-space ABOVE the cockpit. An emergency door could be installed there. Or, although this would rob the plane of some space, built a lavatory into the cockpit.
There are some methods of getting around this problem, I would think.
#43 and #44 are quite good RR. I'd dare to call them sane.And a dedicated to the cause suicide/murderer will find a way around that too, in time.put the lavatory in the cockpit or make it 3 person in the cockpit in case one pilot needs to walk away from the cockpit .
Absolutely an option, I would think.
Doesn't account for the person driving 70 MPH, right towards you...I've heard that said all the time Roadrunner . My only answer is that with driving the person driving is in control rather than the crazy person or a jihadi driving the airplane .
It is not my driving that will kill me on the Interstate.I've heard that said all the time Roadrunner . My only answer is that with driving the person driving is in control rather than the crazy person or a jihadi driving the airplane .
What a bunch of crybaby BS we get from the holier then thou liberal left.
Yes there was speculation on what happened. Terrorism could not be ruled out and since most terrorism today is by Muslim EXTREMISTS then that was a logical guess.
What are the logical options, that the guy just decided to commit suicide taking a plane load of people with him? That would seem to be the most illogical, but apparently what happened. USUALLY when someone does something like this there is a reason, a cause they are dying for.
So it turns out that the speculation was wrong and the most of illogical of scenarios played out.
But, certainly the left has no right to cry foul. How many threads are started by the left with something to the effect, mass shooting, probably a Teaper. I bet right now if you looked you would see several posts started saying that some crime was committed by either a Teaper, Tea Bagger, White Christian, conservative or some other BS stereotype by the liberal left.
Perhaps you would care to comment on the fact that Obama is hell bent on destroying Israel? And that you continue to support him.Thank you for this. Our lunatic fringe seems to have already decided he was a member of ISIS on a mission.
But that's what makes them the lunatic fringe.
Right. He is so hell bent on destroying Israel that billions in U.S. aid still flows there. What your statement has to do with the OP is a mystery.
We can learn from all sorts of things.Let's face it.No 1 has already been explained:
Pilots AND cabin crew have the code to unlock the cockpit. Only, a person inside the cockpit can lock that code out for a time period of 5 minutes, ergo, Lubitz locked out the attempt to give a code at least twice.
I think that is a very bad policy.
I would think the pilot of the airplane would have an override ability.
Dumb.
You mean a pilot outside of the cockpit?
Hmmm, for this very reason, they have that system, to keep a terrorist from forcing a pilot or co-pilot from entering the code. The negation of such a code from the inside would be the method of last resort. Apparently, no one ever thought that a co-pilot might want to use the "negate" method to commit suicide/multiple homocide.
Nothing can stop a person intent on murder or suicide, if they are dedicated.
Apparently this guy was just waiting for the right moment.
Had he been confined to his apartment, he could have just turned on the gas and blown up the whole building.
Where there's a will, there is always a way.
Just the way it is.
Indeed. I can't disagree with you about that, but we can learn from incidents like these.
And a dedicated to the cause suicide/murderer will find a way around that too, in time.put the lavatory in the cockpit or make it 3 person in the cockpit in case one pilot needs to walk away from the cockpit .
Absolutely an option, I would think.
Gee, why not just fire all pilots, and use robots?The knee jerk reaction to this could be is take control from the pilot. Planes can fly and land themselves without the pilot today. So maybe if the plane is above a certain attitude flying a normal flight path then control stays with auto pilot.
Indeed.Gee, why not just fire all pilots, and use robots?
Of course, some hacker could over-ride the robot.
Fact is, any system can be defeated.
What a bunch of crybaby BS we get from the holier then thou liberal left.
Yes there was speculation on what happened. Terrorism could not be ruled out and since most terrorism today is by Muslim EXTREMISTS then that was a logical guess.
What are the logical options, that the guy just decided to commit suicide taking a plane load of people with him? That would seem to be the most illogical, but apparently what happened. USUALLY when someone does something like this there is a reason, a cause they are dying for.
So it turns out that the speculation was wrong and the most of illogical of scenarios played out.
But, certainly the left has no right to cry foul. How many threads are started by the left with something to the effect, mass shooting, probably a Teaper. I bet right now if you looked you would see several posts started saying that some crime was committed by either a Teaper, Tea Bagger, White Christian, conservative or some other BS stereotype by the liberal left.
Who is crying foul?
And who are you to make an educated guess about an incident that likely happened 5,000+ miles away from you?
Furthermore, the OP did not mention any specific group of people. YOU did.
Feeling guilty?
Gee, why not just fire all pilots, and use robots?The knee jerk reaction to this could be is take control from the pilot. Planes can fly and land themselves without the pilot today. So maybe if the plane is above a certain attitude flying a normal flight path then control stays with auto pilot.
Of course, some hacker could over-ride the robot.
Fact is, any system can be defeated.