Official 2020 November Election Thread.

[XponentialChaos]

I am not trying to present a "good argument"

Clearly.

I am just giving you facts

You've given no facts that fraud happens more with mail voting as opposed to in-person voting.

Hence you have not presented a good argument.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I am not trying to present a "good argument"

Clearly.

I am just giving you facts

You've given no facts that fraud happens more with mail voting as opposed to in-person voting.

Hence you have not presented a good argument.

To me common sense = facts. Pretty sure dead people cannot vote in person. Nor can a husband fill out two ballots in person (one for him one for his wife) or three (one for his mother).

If you don't see it as common sense then its on you.

 

[XponentialChaos]

To me common sense = facts.

You have neither facts nor common sense. Sorry.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

To me common sense = facts.

You have neither facts nor common sense. Sorry.

Opinions vary. Way to be unifying.

 

[XponentialChaos]

To me common sense = facts.

You have neither facts nor common sense. Sorry.

Opinions vary. Way to be unifying.

We disagree.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

To me common sense = facts.

You have neither facts nor common sense. Sorry.

Opinions vary. Way to be unifying.

We disagree.

Of course. But you're the only one throwing insults.

 

[XponentialChaos]

To me common sense = facts.

You have neither facts nor common sense. Sorry.

Opinions vary. Way to be unifying.

We disagree.

Of course. But you're the only one throwing insults.

We disagree on that as well.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

To me common sense = facts.

You have neither facts nor common sense. Sorry.

Opinions vary. Way to be unifying.

We disagree.

Of course. But you're the only one throwing insults.

We disagree on that as well.

I guess you see quotes like "You're not making a very good argument" as compliments. Fair enough.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I guess you see quotes like "You're not making a very good argument" as compliments. Fair enough.

Ok. Let me rephrase it for you.

In my opinion, you have not provided a sufficient amount of evidence to justify the claim that you presented. As a result of this, I find your argument unconvincing.

Not intended to be a compliment or an insult.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I guess you see quotes like "You're not making a very good argument" as compliments. Fair enough.

Ok. Let me rephrase it for you.

In my opinion, you have not provided a sufficient amount of evidence to justify the claim that you presented. As a result of this, I find your argument unconvincing.

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

I believe you were indeed trying to make an argument. The argument was
"there is a much larger chance of fraud or errors when you decrease in person voting." Whether you want to call it an argument or an opinion is just semantics so I will just say that I disagree with the thing you claim in this quote.

I find this opinion both lacking in logic and lacking in evidence.

I find it irrelevant that many people share it. Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy.

Ultimately, I thank you for your contribution but I am unconvinced of your opinion. I hope you have a good day.

 

[LiberalsLIE]

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

Dude, you are trying to use common sense with a baby-killing socialist. You are better off talking to a rock.

 

[LiberalsLIE]

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

I believe you were indeed trying to make an argument. The argument was
"there is a much larger chance of fraud or errors when you decrease in person voting." Whether you want to call it an argument or an opinion is just semantics so I will just say that I disagree with the thing you claim in this quote.

I find this opinion both lacking in logic and lacking in evidence.

I find it irrelevant that many people share it. Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy.

Ultimately, I thank you for your contribution but I am unconvinced of your opinion. I hope you have a good day.

OK

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

Dude, you are trying to use common sense with a baby-killing socialist. You are better off talking to a rock.

Careful. The person may identify as a rock. I do not dare assume their pronoun.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

Dude, you are trying to use common sense with a baby-killing socialist. You are better off talking to a rock.

Careful. The person may identify as a rock. I do not dare assume their pronoun.

I'm a male.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I was never making an argument. To me it is a logical opinion, shared by many. I could go research and provide an argument but don't really feel like doing it.

Dude, you are trying to use common sense with a baby-killing socialist. You are better off talking to a rock.

Careful. The person may identify as a rock. I do not dare assume their pronoun.

I'm a male.

OK

 

[freyasman]

I guess you see quotes like "You're not making a very good argument" as compliments. Fair enough.

Ok. Let me rephrase it for you.

In my opinion, you have not provided a sufficient amount of evidence to justify the claim that you presented. As a result of this, I find your argument unconvincing.

Not intended to be a compliment or an insult.

No, that's bullshit because if the situation was reversed you'd be screaming the exact same things yourself while rioters burned city centers....... and you know it. You just don't care now because the cheating went your way.

Your refusing to hear his argument in no way invalidates his argument.

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, that's bullshit because if the situation was reversed you'd be screaming the exact same things yourself while rioters burned city centers....... and you know it. You just don't care now because the cheating went your way.

If what situation was reversed? Election fraud?

I would have accepted the results of the election regardless of who won. I trust out democratic institutions to get the vote counts right. I don't fall for conspiracy theory bullshit that is completely void of actual facts.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No, that's bullshit because if the situation was reversed you'd be screaming the exact same things yourself while rioters burned city centers....... and you know it. You just don't care now because the cheating went your way.

If what situation was reversed? Election fraud?

I would have accepted the results of the election regardless of who won. I trust out democratic institutions to get the vote counts right.

Notice there isn’t any rioting. That’s a good thing. Let’s keep it this way.