Office of Special Counsel Launches Investigation Into Jack Smith

#1 Planning the conspiracy is very relevant to the commission of a crime. It shows and proves intent.

#2 Again, "internal" is a irrelevant. He laundered the money through a business and the conduct of businesses is a matter of law.

#3 Of course you don't "see" the cover up. But that's OK. Cohen is still a felon for campaign finance fraud and Trump is still a felon for felonious business fraud.

WW

Kinda hard to have a conspiracy to cover up a crime if the method of cover up was never available to the public.
 
No, thats how Trump bloated it to 34 felonies. The charges came AFTER he committed 34 felonies.

No, he didnt commit 34 felonies, there were only 7 checks made to cohen. Bragg said every time a receipt was recorded, a piece of paper changed hands, it was a new count.

Even other attorneys thought his case was dubious
 
Kinda hard to have a conspiracy to cover up a crime if the method of cover up was never available to the public.
The records would be available to investigators looking into campaign finance violations. It’s evidence of their guilt. They knew they were committing a crime which is why they hid the crime in their own records.

You don’t think they’d write down their criminal conspiracy, do you?
 
One odd thing I notice about Trumpers, when they are discussing his legal issues:

They seem to think we have never convicted anyone who didn't confess to their crimes. It's very odd.

"You cant prove he meant to do that!!!"

Uh yes, we can and did.
 
The records would be available to investigators looking into campaign finance violations. It’s evidence of their guilt. They knew they were committing a crime which is why they hid the crime in their own records.

You don’t think they’d write down their criminal conspiracy, do you?

You're talking about some supposed future potential investigation. We're talking about what happened in the here and now.

BTW, we're still drifting away from the topic at hand, which is Letitia James, and here subpoenas...
 
You're talking about some supposed future potential investigation. We're talking about what happened in the here and now.

BTW, we're still drifting away from the topic at hand, which is Letitia James, and here subpoenas...
That trial came and went, sorry.
 
That trial came and went, sorry.
What Marener is talking about is a cover up for some possible future investigation.


In the investigation that happened, the only reason we even know about the records is BECAUSE of the investigation, which was ran as a hit job on trump.
 
You're talking about some supposed future potential investigation. We're talking about what happened in the here and now.

BTW, we're still drifting away from the topic at hand, which is Letitia James, and here subpoenas...
That’s the whole point of a conspiracy. To hide the crime from investigators.
 
What Marener is talking about is a cover up for some possible future investigation.


In the investigation that happened, the only reason we even know about the records is BECAUSE of the investigation, which was ran as a hit job on trump.
But was perfecrly legal. So you dont have a good argument, and certainly not one that would hold up in court.

Just as all of your other arguments about trump's felonies didn't hold up in court.
 
15th post
And then he weaponized government agencies to go after his enemies. How about those pearls?
No, he didn't. And nobody has, on the scale Trump is, save for maybe Hoover.

And your tu quoque point cuts both ways, you know. Are you saying you are not fine with Obama doing it, but ARE fine with Trump doing it? Interesting. Kinda looks like cultism, ya know?

Or are you saying you're fine with both? Or, is it neither?
 
No, he didn't. And nobody has, on the scale Trump is, save for maybe Hoover.

And your tu quoque point cuts both ways, you know. Are you saying you are not fine with Obama doing it, but ARE fine with Trump doing it? Interesting. Kinda looks like cultism, ya know?

Or are you saying you're fine with both? Or, is it neither?
Obama set precedent. Deal with it
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom