theHawk
Registered Conservative
Why would protesting at the Capitol be considered “treason”?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
Why would protesting at the Capitol be considered “treason”?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
The majority of folks who stayed OUTSIDE the Capitol are protesters, exercising their 1st Amendment rights ...Why would protesting at the Capitol be considered “treason”?
Beware the dreaded Triple Whammy!It would appear that the Eye of Fleegle is simply Evil with no need for explanation or further inspection.Good call EvilEye. Thanks for posting.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
![]()
I think once a law is broken..along with a few windows and a cop's head....that the constitutional rights argument becomes just a bit moot. Most of these guys were inside....For being at a protest? Why? Do policeman not have constitutional rights?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
Rioters maybe, although many were let in by police. Even if they were rioting, what does that have to do with treason?The few who rushed in and broke through the barriers were rioters and treasonous dogs ...
What guys? The rioters who were actually in the Capital or the vast majority of peaceful protestors whom were not?I think once a law is broken..along with a few windows and a cop's head....that the constitutional rights argument becomes just a bit moot. Most of these guys were inside....For being at a protest? Why? Do policeman not have constitutional rights?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
I know you can't be what folks consider to be a REAL patriotic, American. What a joke.They rebelled against our corrupt congress and you think this is treason?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
We had all sorts of people rebelling against our corrupt congress, you silly communist.
This riot was during a Constitutionally mandated Congressional proceeding ... with the expressed purpose of disrupting that Constitutional proceeding so that the Constitutional mandate could not be completed ... attacking the Constitution is treason ... that's different from spray painting the outside of a Federal courthouse or burning down a few private businesses ...Rioters maybe, although many were let in by police. Even if they were rioting, what does that have to do with treason?
You think Trump is.The hell we don't get to decide if congress is corrupt---those aholes are not above the law.They dont get to decide congress is corrupt. Yes its treason.They rebelled against our corrupt congress and you think this is treason?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
We had all sorts of people rebelling against our corrupt congress, you silly communist.
Those who WILL destroy us, were in-session. Dummy.This riot was during a Constitutionally mandated Congressional proceeding ... with the expressed purpose of disrupting that Constitutional proceeding so that the Constitutional mandate could not be completed ... attacking the Constitution is treason ... that's different from spray painting the outside of a Federal courthouse or burning down a few private businesses ...Rioters maybe, although many were let in by police. Even if they were rioting, what does that have to do with treason?
I know you hate America ... and that's why you're defending those who would destroy us ...
Walk me through that statement. Are you saying that you support the constitutional rights of police officers, but they lose them if some other random person at a protest breaks the law?I think once a law is broken..along with a few windows and a cop's head....that the constitutional rights argument becomes just a bit moot. Most of these guys were inside....For being at a protest? Why? Do policeman not have constitutional rights?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
Ever heard of a false flag?It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
They’re confused. Their hatred of Trump makes them dumb.Walk me through that statement. Are you saying that you support the constitutional rights of police officers, but they lose them if some other random person at a protest breaks the law?I think once a law is broken..along with a few windows and a cop's head....that the constitutional rights argument becomes just a bit moot. Most of these guys were inside....For being at a protest? Why? Do policeman not have constitutional rights?Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
I second this. Remaining quiet only makes your own self an accessory.Good. They should turn in treasonous criminals.It would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection:
So the leftwing protesters that broke into the Capitol to disrupt the Kavanaugh hearing, a Constitutional mandated hearing, with the sole purpose to stop it, thus “attacking” the Constitution. Where is your post denouncing that as an “attack” on the Constitution?This riot was during a Constitutionally mandated Congressional proceeding ... with the expressed purpose of disrupting that Constitutional proceeding so that the Constitutional mandate could not be completed ... attacking the Constitution is treason ... that's different from spray painting the outside of a Federal courthouse or burning down a few private businesses ...Rioters maybe, although many were let in by police. Even if they were rioting, what does that have to do with treason?
I know you hate America ... and that's why you're defending those who would destroy us ...
It bears repeating that if they didn't have double standards, they'd have none at all.So the leftwing protesters that broke into the Capitol to disrupt the Kavanaugh hearing, a Constitutional mandated hearing, with the sole purpose to stop it, thus “attacking” the Constitution. Where is your post denouncing that as an “attack” on the Constitution?This riot was during a Constitutionally mandated Congressional proceeding ... with the expressed purpose of disrupting that Constitutional proceeding so that the Constitutional mandate could not be completed ... attacking the Constitution is treason ... that's different from spray painting the outside of a Federal courthouse or burning down a few private businesses ...Rioters maybe, although many were let in by police. Even if they were rioting, what does that have to do with treason?
I know you hate America ... and that's why you're defending those who would destroy us ...
Ugly people think ugly things. What a revelation.I've decided to stop donating to Vet and LE orgs. As it's obvious that they'll support tyranny in an Acme minute. Their pensions are more valuable than freedom.
My money, my choice.
Article I of the US Constitution is destroying the US Constitution ... Bubba didn't finish Middle School ...Those who WILL destroy us, were in-session. Dummy.
I don't think it counts when they're hunting people who messed with copsIt would appear that the Blue Wall of Silence draws the line at civil insurection: